Articles | Volume 34, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-34-223-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-34-223-2022
Research article
 | 
12 Apr 2022
Research article |  | 12 Apr 2022

Redefinition of beraunite, Fe3+6(PO4)4O(OH)4  ⋅  6H2O, and discreditation of the name eleonorite: a re-investigation of type material from the Hrbek Mine (Czech Republic)

Luboš Vrtiška, Jaromír Tvrdý, Jakub Plášil, Jiří Sejkora, Radek Škoda, Nikita V. Chukanov, Andreas Massanek, Jan Filip, Zdeněk Dolníček, and František Veselovský

Viewed

Total article views: 864 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
630 216 18 864 47 8 6
  • HTML: 630
  • PDF: 216
  • XML: 18
  • Total: 864
  • Supplement: 47
  • BibTeX: 8
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Apr 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Apr 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 810 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 810 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
The study of the original material of beraunite from the type locality Hrbek, Czech Rep., from collections of the TU Bergakademie Freiberg (Germany) and National Museum Prague (Czech Republic) proved the identity of the minerals beraunite and eleonorite. Because the name beraunite has priority, we consider the name eleonorite to be redundant and proposed to abolish it. The proposal 21-D approved by the IMA discredited eleonorite and accepted the formula of beraunite Fe3+6(PO4)4O(OH)4·6H2O.