Articles | Volume 36, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-36-381-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-36-381-2024
Research article
 | 
03 May 2024
Research article |  | 03 May 2024

Comparison between 2D and 3D microstructures and implications for metamorphic constraints using a chloritoid–garnet-bearing mica schist

Fabiola Caso, Alessandro Petroccia, Sara Nerone, Andrea Maffeis, Alberto Corno, and Michele Zucali

Viewed

Total article views: 1,059 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
841 173 45 1,059 52 39 38
  • HTML: 841
  • PDF: 173
  • XML: 45
  • Total: 1,059
  • Supplement: 52
  • BibTeX: 39
  • EndNote: 38
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 May 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 May 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,036 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,036 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 17 Apr 2025
Download
Short summary
Despite the fact that rock textures depend on the 3D spatial distribution of minerals, our tectono-metamorphic reconstructions are mostly based on a 2D visualisation (i.e. thin sections). For 2D a thin section scan has been combined with chemical X-ray maps, whereas for 3D the X-ray computerised axial microtomography (μCT) has been applied. This study corroborates the reliability of the thin section approach, still emphasising that 3D visualisation can help understand rock textures.
Share