<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">EJM</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>European Journal of Mineralogy</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">EJM</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Eur. J. Mineral.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1617-4011</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/ejm-33-401-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Geochemistry and paleogeographic implications of Permo-Triassic
metasedimentary cover from the <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Tauern Window (Eastern Alps)</article-title><alt-title>Permo-Triassic metasedimentary cover Tauern Window</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Permo-Triassic metasedimentary cover Tauern Window}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{G.~Franz et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Franz</surname><given-names>Gerhard</given-names></name>
          <email>gefra548@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kutzschbach</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Berryman</surname><given-names>Eleanor J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Meixner</surname><given-names>Anette</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4901-4203</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Loges</surname><given-names>Anselm</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Schultze</surname><given-names>Dina</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Technische Universität Berlin, Chair of Applied Geochemistry, 10587 Berlin, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>CanmetMINING, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, K1A 0G1, Ontario,
Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Faculty of Geosciences &amp; MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental
Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Freie Universität Berlin, Chair of Mineralogy, 12249 Berlin, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Gerhard Franz (gefra548@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>21</day><month>July</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>33</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>401</fpage><lpage>423</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Gerhard Franz et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/33/401/2021/ejm-33-401-2021.html">This article is available from https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/33/401/2021/ejm-33-401-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/33/401/2021/ejm-33-401-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/33/401/2021/ejm-33-401-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e148">The chemical composition of metasediments is a valuable
source of paleogeographic information about the protolith's sedimentary
environment. Here, we compile major- and trace-element whole-rock data,
including B contents, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>B-isotope ratios from the Permo-Triassic
metasedimentary cover of the Pfitsch–Mörchner basin, overlying the
Variscan basement in the western Tauern Window, Eastern Alps
(Austria and Italy). The basement consists of orthogneiss (“Zentralgneis”,
metamorphosed Variscan granitoids with intrusion ages between 305 and 280 Ma), and the roof pendant consists of granites (amphibolites, paragneiss, and
minor serpentinites). The Zentralgneis is partly hydrothermally altered into
pyrite quartzite with high Al–S contents, low Na–Sr–Ca–Mg contents, and very strong
depletion of the light rare earth elements. Comparison with published
detailed mapping of this and other time-equivalent basins in the western
Tauern Window, with radiometric age data in the literature, and with
unmetamorphosed basins in the South Alpine realm yields a late Permian to
Early Triassic age of sedimentation.</p>
    <p id="d1e165">Although during Alpine metamorphism all rocks were strongly deformed, the
whole-rock chemical compositions of the metasediments were not pervasively
changed during deformation. We show that the sediments were deposited in a
small, probably lacustrine–fluviatile, intramontane basin, under arid to
semi-arid climatic conditions. The sequence starts with metaconglomerates,
which can be interpreted as a mixture of the different basement rocks, based
on a combination of major-element ratios Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)
and MgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (MgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) with concentrations of trace elements Cr, V,
and Ni. The sequence is overlain by a fining-upwards sequence of clastic
sediments, in which the behavior of K, Rb, and Sr allows the reconstruction
of intense diagenetic K–B metasomatism, which raised the K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O contents
up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 wt %. The average B content of 218 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is
well above the B content of common sediments, and the B-isotope composition
reaches extremely low values of down to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B. The top of the sequence is a lazulite quartzite, interpreted as a
former conglomeratic phosphatic sandstone, which marks the transition from a
closed Permian basin to an open Triassic basin. Within the clastic sequence,
the presence of hydrothermal tourmalinite veins documents a hydrothermal
event after deposition but before the onset of Alpine metamorphism. A
metamorphosed mafic dike swarm in the orthogneiss indicates a post-Variscan
event of basaltic magmatism, and this event is tentatively correlated with
increased heat flow in the Triassic basin and hydrothermal activity. A
consistent conceptual model of this basin and its diagenetic modifications,
based on a combination of geochemical data with petrographical and field
information, provides the geodynamic context of the European margin at the
onset of the Alpine orogeny.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<?pagebreak page402?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e309">Paleogeographic reconstructions allow us to translate the modern rock record
into a picture of Earth's dynamic past. The geochemistry of meta-igneous
rocks is routinely used to decipher pre-orogenic origins, revealing the
traces of former magmatic arcs, intrusions, or spreading centers (e.g., Middlemost, 1994; Pearce and Cann, 1973; Pearce et al., 1984). However,
geochemical fingerprinting is less regularly applied to metasedimentary
rocks. Reconstructing the depositional environment of these often-neglected
strata can contribute important insights into puzzles needed to understand
the greater paleogeodynamic picture. Here, we use the major and
trace elements (including rare earth elements, REEs, plus Y), as well as
B contents and B-isotope chemical composition, of a metasedimentary unit and
its basement to decipher the nature of the protoliths and their
depositional environment. The area for this case study is a Permian–Mesozoic
basin with predominantly continental clastic deposits, situated above a
Variscan basement, located at the Pfitscher Joch (Passo di Vizze in Italian), on the
Austrian–Italian border (Fig. 1). We show that despite a strong metamorphic
overprint, geochemical data combined with detailed mapping (Lammerer, 1986)
and petrographic descriptions (Veselá and Lammerer, 2008; Veselá et
al., 2008, 2011), complemented by our own observations,
allow derivation of a consistent picture of the sedimentary and diagenetic
environments for the basin. This information provides the geodynamic context
of the European margin at the onset of the Alpine orogeny.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e314">Geological sketch map of the western Tauern Window (inset shows
the location at the Italian–Austrian border), highlighting the post-Variscan
metasedimentary basins. Star indicates position of the schematic sedimentary
profiles (Fig. 2), and the mine symbol indicates “Alpeinerscharte”, the location of the
abandoned molybdenite mine. Modified from Lammerer et al. (2008) and
Veselá et al. (2008). Abbreviations: TNB, Tauern North Boundary Fault;
BNF, Brenner Normal Fault; PL, Pustertal Line, part of the Periadriatic
Lineament; GSZ, Greiner shear zone.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/33/401/2021/ejm-33-401-2021-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <label>1.1</label><title>Regional geology</title>
      <p id="d1e330">The southwestern Tauern Window in the Eastern Alps is a classic area for
investigating the interplay between tectonics and metamorphism of the Alps.
This easily accessible area with excellent outcrops is also popular for
field trips that capitalize on the perfectly exposed important features of
the Eastern Alps (e.g., Morteani, 1974; Lammerer and Morteani, 1990; Lammerer
et al., 2011). This tectonic window exposes part of the Subpenninic and
Penninic units, which are otherwise hidden by the overthrusted Austroalpine
superunit (Fig. 1).</p>
      <p id="d1e333">The Pfitscher Joch area has been the focus of a particularly large amount of
research aimed at reconstructing the pressure–temperature–time path of
different tectonic units in the Tauern Window (Selverstone et al., 1984;
Selverstone and Spear, 1985; Selverstone, 1988; Schulz et al., 1995; Schulz,
1996), their structural evolution (Selverstone, 1985, 1993), and age data
using different isotope systems and minerals (e.g., Glodny et al., 2008;
Schmid et al., 2013; Rosenberg et al., 2018; Ricchi et al., 2020, and
references therein). This work has generated a coherent picture of regional
metamorphic tectonic Alpine history. The peak of orogenic metamorphism
reached temperatures of up to 500–550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and pressures of up to
1.0–1.1 GPa (Selverstone et al., 1984). Nearly isothermal decompression was
rapid (Selverstone et al., 1984) and occurred during orogen-parallel
exhumation (e.g., Ratschbacher et al., 1991) and large-scale E–W extension
(Behrmann, 1988; Selverstone, 1988).</p>
      <p id="d1e345">The Subpenninic and Penninic units exposed by the Tauern Window have been
interpreted as the pre-Alpine distal European margin and remnants of the
Tethys Ocean, respectively (e.g., Schmid et al., 2013, and references
therein). The post-Variscan metasedimentary units described herein (Fig. 1)
belong to the Subpenninic nappes, exposed in the core of the Tauern Window.
These strata are the stratigraphically lowermost tectonic units and
primarily consist of (pre-)Variscan basement rocks intruded by late- and
post-Variscan granitoids and subvolcanic rocks (e.g., Cesare et al., 2002;
Veselá et al., 2011). The latter units are traditionally referred to as
the Zentralgneis (“gneiss cores”, e.g., Morteani, 1974; “gneiss horsts”,
Veselá and Lammerer, 2008). In the western Tauern Window, the
Zentralgneis is divided into the Ahorn, Tux, and Zillertal nappes, stacked
to form the Venediger Duplex (e.g., Frisch, 1980; Lammerer and Weger, 1998;
Lammerer et al., 2008; Schmid et al., 2013). The Tux Zentralgneis is
characterized as a strongly fractionated, calc-alkaline, I-type granitoid
(Finger et al., 1993); hosts the molybdenite deposit of the Alpeinerscharte;
and shows features of intermediate argillic alteration (Mostler et al.,
1982; Melcher et al., 1995), typical of porphyry granitoids.</p>
      <p id="d1e348">The metasedimentary cover overlies the Tux and Zillertal units and is folded
between these two rigid bodies into an elongated basin, the
Pfitsch–Mörchner basin, together with other post-Variscan sedimentary
basins. Veselá et al. (2008) and Veselá and Lammerer (2008) proposed
post-Variscan intramontane basins as the depositional environment for the
Carboniferous to Mesozoic sediments. Such basins would have formed part of a
network of basins in the paleogeographical central European and Alpine
region of Pangea, which Elter et al. (2020) described as comprising
pull-apart basins between the landmasses of Laurussia and Gondwana.</p>
      <p id="d1e352">Today, the metasedimentary rocks of the Pfitsch–Mörchner basin form a
large, ENE–WSW-striking, isoclinally folded syncline that runs parallel to
the Greiner shear zone, which is situated between the Tux and the Zillertal
Zentralgneis units (e.g., Behrmann, 1988; Behrmann and Frisch, 1990;
Selverstone et al., 1991), together with the Ahorn, Olperer, and Tux shear
zones (e.g., Rosenberg and Schneider, 2008; Ricci et al., 2020). The
original bedding is apparent in lithologic contacts, except near to the fold
hinge where shearing has obliterated the original sedimentary structure. The
Carboniferous to Jurassic age (Veselá et al., 2011) of the major basins
of the western Tauern Window limits these post-Variscan cover units to
having experienced only Alpine greenschist to amphibolite facies
metamorphism. Any indications of Permian low-temperature<?pagebreak page403?> hydrothermal
metamorphism found in other parts of the Alps (review in Schuster and
Stüwe, 2008) have probably been erased by the stronger Alpine
metamorphism.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <label>1.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Petrography of the Pfitsch--M\"{o}rchner basin and sample material}?><title>Petrography of the Pfitsch–Mörchner basin and sample material</title>
      <p id="d1e365">The sample set is subdivided into the SE limb and the NW limb of the fold
(Fig. 2). It comprises basement rocks and the overlying metasedimentary
rocks, including what Veselá and Lammerer (2008) called the Pfitsch
Formation and the Windtal Formation, up to an overlying marble unit, the
Aigerbach Formation. The geological map of the Brenner Basistunnel 1 : 50 000
(Brandner et al., 2011) classifies the sequence as the Triassic Aigerbach
Formation overlying Permian(?) metaconglomerates. In the compilation of
Schmidt et al. (2013) the sequence corresponds to their units 1 and 2
(basement), 4 (conglomerates), 5 (Permo-Scythian quartzites), and 6
(limestone).</p>
      <p id="d1e368">Beneath the SE limb of the fold, the basement consists of thin (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 m) orthogneiss lamella of the Zillertal Zentralgneis, amphibolite
(variety hornblende garbenschist), and small bodies of serpentinite (Fig. 2). Further south lies a thick (pre-)Variscan series of graphitic
mica schists called Furtschagl schist (Christa, 1931; Selverstone and
Muñoz, 1987). Northward, the uppermost unit of the SE limb is a
quartzite, separated from the metasedimentary sequence by a 1–2 m thin
layer of hornblende garbenschist (see Supplement 4.3.4 in Franz et al.,
2021). It marks the top of the basement, characterized by a conspicuous
reddish weathering of pyrite from which the local name of the Rotbachl (“red
creek”) is derived, best exposed in a profile at the crest of the
Rotbachlspitze (Fig. 3a). This pyrite quartzite has a well-developed
schistosity with some white mica. It is feldspar(–albite)-bearing in several
layers near the base, where it is interspersed with a
biotite–chlorite–plagioclase gneiss. It also has a zone rich in quartz and
kyanite and a smaller lens rich in staurolite, in addition to several
quartz segregations. Near the top, magnetite-rich lenses appear. These
lenses extend up to 30 m along strike and a few meters perpendicularly to
strike; the assemblage contains
magnetite–chloritoid–staurolite–chlorite–ilmenite–white mica–quartz, locally
with<?pagebreak page404?> albite, in varying proportions (Fig. 3c; Barrientos and Selverstone,
1987), abbreviated below as MCSC lenses.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e380">Schematic stratigraphic columns of the rocks from the
Pfitsch–Mörchner basin, reconstructed from Lammerer (1986), Veselá
and Lammerer (2008), and own mapping. Shown is the situation on the NW and SW
limb of the syncline near to the road to the Pfitscher Joch as it might have
appeared after sedimentation, neglecting Alpine deformation (e.g., the
originally crosscutting tourmalinite dike in the NW limb is isoclinally
folded and oriented parallel to strike). Note that along-strike thickness of
the units varies; e.g., the pyrite quartzite in the SE limb is much thicker
at Rotbachlspitze, and it pinches out towards the SW and NE.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/33/401/2021/ejm-33-401-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e392">Field photographs and hand specimen and thin-section images of
representative rocks.
<bold>(a)</bold> View at top of Rotbachlspitze, showing in the foreground the basement of
the Pfitsch–Mörchner basin, the Zillertal unit country rock
(biotite–chlorite–plagioclase gneiss), interlayered with weathered reddish
pyrite quartzite. The background shows the peaks of the Zentralgneis from the
Tux unit, with the Schrammacher peak and to its right the locality of the
molybdenite deposit of the Alpeinerscharte. Location of the figure <bold>(b)</bold>
with the mafic dike swarm is indicated.
<bold>(b)</bold> View from the crest of the Rotbachlspitze towards the lower part of the
Tux Zentralgneis, with the mafic dike swarm (outlined) between and left of
the two moraine walls of the Schrammacher glacier.
<bold>(c)</bold> Hand specimen of magnetite–chloritoid–staurolite–chlorite lens; sample
is 12 cm wide. The specimen is similar to sample H in Barrientos and
Selverstone (1993).
<bold>(d)</bold> Cut slice of metaconglomerate, the base of the Mesozoic
Pfitsch–Mörchner basin. Note partly angular, partly rounded pebble
components (for more details, see text).
<bold>(e)</bold> Cut and polished slice of tourmaline gneiss with light, lens-shaped,
feldspar-rich aggregates, interpreted as deformed pebbles of a conglomeratic
precursor (for more photos see Supplement 4.3.8 in Franz et al., 2021)
<bold>(f)</bold> Hand specimen of lazulite quartzite, the top of the Pfitsch–Mörchner
Formation, view onto the foliation plane; size of the sample's longest dimension is 16 cm. Light blue patches are aggregates of lazulite with other
phosphate minerals (for details, see text).
<bold>(g)</bold> Field photograph of strongly deformed and folded metaconglomerate, with
a thin tourmalinite vein (upper right of hammer handle).
<bold>(h)</bold> Cut and polished slice of tourmalinite vein in the lazulite quartzite.
Foliation is horizontal; the vein is slightly discordant to the weathered yellowish
quartzite. Note the bimodal character of the tourmalinite, with an
upper and lower domain rich in tourmaline and a quartz-rich central domain;
for more photos of crosscutting relations see Supplement 4.3.6 in Franz et
al. (2021) and Henry et al. (2002).
<bold>(i)</bold> Thin-section micrograph of hand specimen (plane-polarized light), shown
in <bold>(g)</bold>, showing the central fine-grained and quartz-rich domain (upper
part), followed by the tourmaline-rich domain. The lower part is the
conglomeratic quartzite country rock.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=321.516142pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/33/401/2021/ejm-33-401-2021-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e435">The metasedimentary succession of the Pfitsch–Mörchner basin starts with
a strongly sheared metaconglomerate (Fig. 3d). Up-section the
metaconglomerate grades into a thin layer of mica schist, followed by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 m of a tourmaline-rich, poorly foliated feldspathic rock
called tourmaline gneiss (Berryman et al., 2017). The high tourmaline
content, which was formed during metamorphism, is a characteristic feature
of these rocks, and tourmaline also occurs in segregations. The gneiss
contains lenticular quartz- and feldspar-rich, mica- and chlorite-poor bodies, up
to 5 cm long and up to 1.5 cm thick, interpreted as relict pebble structures
(Fig. 3e; for more images see Supplement 4.3.8 in Franz et al., 2021). In some
areas, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 cm thick lenses of fine-grained, muscovite-bearing
quartzite appear between the tourmaline gneiss and layers of mica schist
(with chlorite and biotite). In sharp contact with the latter is a
fine-grained, chlorite–biotite schist grading upwards into biotite schist,
grouped here together and subsequently referred to as mica schist. The
Pfitsch–Mörchner basin succession is topped by an approximately
250 m thick unit of carbonate–mica schist distinguished in the field by
ankerite–biotite aggregates (sites for the reaction ankerite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> muscovite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> calcite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> biotite). The same unit is only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 m thick
in the NW limb of the basin.</p>
      <p id="d1e481">In the NW limb, the basement (Fig. 2) is formed by the large Tux
Zentralgneis body that consists of several intrusions of granitoids with
aplite dikes. In the investigated area, we distinguish two types: one with
the local name “Augenflasergneis” (describing the augen texture and
irregular foliation) and a leucocratic type with a poorly developed
foliation that is referred to here as “Schrammacher Gneis” (interpreted as a
highly differentiated granite with local beryl–phenakite mineralization;
Franz et al., 1986). The granitoids are cut by post-Variscan mafic dikes,
which were transformed into biotite schist during Alpine metamorphism (Fig. 3b). The host rocks of the granitoids, known as “Altes Dach” (old roof
pendant), are predominantly amphibolites with minor amounts of
garnet-bearing (para)gneiss, hornblende garbenschist, and a series of
serpentinite bodies with blackwall zoning. A pyritic quartzite unit with
MCSC lenses corresponding to that identified at the top of the basement
units in the SE limb could not be identified. The succession of the Pfitsch
Formation starts with a poorly sorted metaconglomerate and in places a
meta-breccia, well exposed at a small lake (Langsee; De Vecchi and Baggio,
1982; Lammerer, 1986). The large pebbles (Fig. 3d) are up to 30 cm in size;
angular to sub-rounded; and made of macroscopically distinguishable
gneisses (meta-aplite, biotite-bearing metagranite), calc-silicates (rich in
epidote minerals), amphibolite, marble, biotite schist, mica schist with
Cr-bearing muscovite, and quartz in a fine-grained matrix of
mica–chlorite–plagioclase–epidote–quartz. The mica schist with Cr-bearing
muscovite (Lammerer, 1986; Schön and Lammerer, 1993) is a characteristic
pebble type and guides identification of the metaconglomerate unit in areas
of high strain, where the shape of the pebbles has been obliterated by
Alpine shearing and flattening. This is especially the case in the SE limb,
where these rocks show a well-developed schistosity defined by white mica
and small-scale layering. In the NW limb, the metaconglomerate crops out
over approximately 200 m, and in the SE limb it crops out over approximately 100 m.
Lammerer (1986) estimated the original thickness of the unit as nearly 500 m.</p>
      <?pagebreak page406?><p id="d1e484">The contact between the Pfitsch Formation and the next unit (Windtal
Formation), a muscovite-bearing lazulite quartzite with a well-developed
schistosity, is gradual over a distance of approximately 2 m. This contact
zone has thin layers (centimeters to tens of centimeters) of carbonate–mica schist alternating
with muscovite-bearing quartzite. The quartzite contains conspicuous blue
lazulite (Fig. 3f), together with kyanite, staurolite, magnetite, hematite,
chlorite, tourmaline, and a number of different Al–P minerals (lazulite,
svanbergite–goyazite, bearthite, apatite), described in detail in Morteani
and Ackermand (1996). Staurolite occurs only in the SE limb and is not
observed in samples with lazulite. Heavy minerals are concentrated in
layers, suggesting the original bedding (Morteani and Ackermand, 1996). The
high content of quartz indicates a compositionally mature sandstone
protolith. Magnetite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> chlorite) dominates in the NW limb. Flattened
quartz nodules, up to approximately 10 cm in length, record dominantly plane
strain and are sites of major volume loss by pressure solution (Selverstone
and Hyatt, 2003).</p>
      <p id="d1e494">Quartz veins and tourmalinite veins, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1–2 cm thick,
consisting of quartz and very fine grained tourmaline, cut the lazulite
quartzite (Henry et al., 2002; Selverstone and Hyatt, 2003). Tourmaline-rich
and quartz-rich domains comprise the tourmalinite veins (Fig. 3g, h).
Tourmaline-rich bands contain up to 75 vol %  tourmaline, and quartz-rich
bands contain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 vol %  tourmaline (Fig. 3i; Henry et al., 2002).
In places where they cut the original bedding, the veins are isoclinally
folded (Fig. 3g); in other areas, the veins are (sub)parallel to the
foliation (Fig. 3h). In some occurrences, the veins are dismembered by
shearing and resemble centimeter-sized pebbles (Lammerer, 1986); for more images see
Supplement 4.3.6 in Franz et al. (2021) and Henry et al. (2002). These relicts
of the tourmalinite veins were also found in the metaconglomerate and in the
tourmaline gneiss.</p>
      <p id="d1e511">The uppermost metasedimentary unit in this area is a dolomite marble
(Aigerbach Formation; Veselá and Lammerer, 2008), which forms the
central part of the fold.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Geochemical results</title>
      <p id="d1e523">Whole-rock major and trace elements (205 samples) were determined by X-ray
fluorescence at Technische Universität Berlin, except REEs, which were determined on a subset of
23 samples by ICP-MS on fused samples at Actlabs in Vancouver, Canada (code
4B2). Boron concentrations and isotope ratios of 25 whole-rock samples were
analyzed in the Isotope Geochemistry Laboratory at MARUM – Center for
Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen (Germany).</p>
      <p id="d1e526">The complete dataset of the different units – metasediments and basement
(14 samples for the metaconglomerate unit, 19 for the mica schist, 9 for the
carbonate–mica schist, 35 for the tourmaline gneiss, 25 for the lazulite
quartzite, 1 for the marble, 39 for the Zentralgneis, 9 for
biotite–chlorite–plagioclase gneiss, 31 for the pyrite quartzite, 9 for the
MCSC lenses, and 11 for serpentinite including blackwall zones) – is published
in a data repository at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5880/fidgeo.2021.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5880/fidgeo.2021.013</ext-link> (Franz et al., 2021) and presented in Fig. 4, together with data from
previous studies (Barrientos and Selverstone, 1987; Morteani and Ackermand,
1996; Selverstone and Hyatt, 2003; Berryman et al., 2017). The very
heterogeneous pre-Variscan gneiss-amphibolite unit and the Furtschagl schist
were not analyzed for major- and trace-element composition, but B contents
and B-isotope compositions were determined.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Major and trace elements</title>
      <p id="d1e539">Overall, the metasedimentary rocks have a wide range of Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (Fig. 4a), whereas the orthogneisses (Zentralgneis) show
a restricted SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 78 wt %. Data from the serpentinite bodies include
metasomatically altered border zones (blackwall zones of talc, actinolite,
chlorite, biotite; similar to rocks described by Trumbull et al., 2008, from
the Tauern Window east of the study area), which are high in Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O. Most data from the MCSC lenses have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 wt % Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, but there is a significant overlap with data from the
pyrite quartzite. The lazulite quartzite has SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents up to 90 wt %; samples with high Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 wt %)
are mica-rich selvages around quartz nodules, indicative of silica loss
during Alpine deformation (Selverstone and Hyatt, 2003).</p>
      <p id="d1e680">Mica schist, carbonate–mica schist, and tourmaline gneiss follow a common
positively correlated trend in MgO and Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (Fig. 4b). The lazulite quartzite and MCSC lenses, corresponding to the top and
bottom of the Pfitsch Formation, respectively, both have high
Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and relatively low MgO. In contrast, the pyrite
quartzite that surrounds and underlies the MCSC lenses has a low
Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content and a relatively high MgO content. Alkali
elements Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (Fig. 4c) of metaconglomerate, tourmaline
gneiss, and mica schists show a negative correlation, the lazulite quartzite
and the pyrite quartzite being very poor in Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, except the
feldspar-bearing variety of the pyrite quartzite. In terms of CaO and
Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (not shown), the mica schist, carbonate–mica schist, and
tourmaline gneiss are Ca-dominant, whereas many samples of the
metaconglomerate, MCSC lenses, and pyrite quartzite are Na-dominant. The Ca
contents are variable and reach 10 wt % CaO in the tourmaline gneiss and
17 wt % CaO in one metaconglomerate sample. The carbonate–mica schist (3.75 wt % CaO) and mica schist (3.05 wt % CaO) do not differ significantly.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e797">Variation diagrams illustrating the chemical composition of rock
units from the Pfitsch area. Data are presented in the data publication
(Franz et al., 2021) and include data from the literature and this work. <bold>(a)</bold> SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; the metasedimentary rock units show a large
spread, e.g., tourmaline gneiss ranges from approximately 45 wt % SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
to 77 wt % SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mica schist and carbonate–mica schist from
approximately 52 wt % to 80 wt % SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Data points for
lazulite quartzite with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 wt % Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represent
mica-rich selvages around quartz nodules and indicate local transport of
SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Selverstone and Hyatt, 2003); data points for serpentinite with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 wt % Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represent biotite–chlorite-rich
blackwall zoning, indicating local metasomatism. The Zentralgneis shows a
very restricted composition (one outlier at 60 wt % SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represents a
biotite-rich zone). <bold>(b)</bold> MgO–Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; metasediments follow a broad 1 : 2 correlation. The
MCSC lenses and the lazulite quartzite are significantly enriched in
Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the pyrite quartzite and the feldspar-bearing
pyrite quartzite are enriched in MgO. <bold>(c)</bold> Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O–K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O; tourmaline gneiss shows high but variable
K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O contents, and lazulite quartzite is poor in Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O. <bold>(d)</bold> Rb–K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O; trace element Rb is closely coupled to K. The
tourmaline gneiss, mica schist and carbonate–mica schist follow a trend of
Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.005, close to the trend defined by average composition of shale
and sandstone (from Turekian and Wedepohl, 1961), but with a large
variation between 0.008 and 0.002. The Zentralgneis variety AFG (Tux
branch) and Zillertal branch (Rotbachlspitze) are well correlated, whereas
the variety Schrammacher Gneis (SG) shows a large spread. The
pyrite quartzite has the lowest Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K at below 0.002. <bold>(e)</bold> Sr–CaO; although Sr is broadly coupled to Ca, there are extreme
Sr enrichments in samples of the lazulite quartzite (inset), due to
celestite in some samples (Morteani and Ackermand, 1996). <bold>(f)</bold> TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (total) are positively correlated near to a
value of 1 : 10, although with a large scatter; the paleosol has high
Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents. Lazulite quartzite samples with high
TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values represent mica-rich selvages around quartz
(Selverstone and Hyatt, 2003).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/33/401/2021/ejm-33-401-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page408?><p id="d1e1134">The K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and Rb contents are well correlated (Fig. 4d), forming two
trends: one for the tourmaline gneiss, carbonate–mica schist, and mica
schist and the other for the lazulite quartzite, MCSC lenses, and the pyrite
quartzite. Values for the heterogeneous metaconglomerate scatter strongly
and are not included in these trend lines. The first trend corresponds to an
Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K ratio in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003 to 0.008, centering around
a value of 0.005 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This trend is consistent with the
average K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and Rb values for clastic sediments from upper continental
crust (sandstone and shale; Turekian and Wedepohl, 1961). The orthogneisses
(variety Augenflasergneis and gneiss from the Zillertal unit) show a
comparable trend; data for the Schrammacher Gneis similarly display a large
amount of scatter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Lazulite quartzite, MCSC lenses, and
pyrite quartzite trend closely near an average of 0.002 Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K, suggesting
fractionation of Rb from K (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e1222">Strontium and Ca contents (Fig. 4e) are extremely variable and poorly
correlated. The lazulite quartzite, despite having a very low Ca content, is
strongly enriched in Sr, up to 20 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and contains accessory
celestite (see Morteani and Ackermand, 1996). Serpentinite rocks with
blackwall zoning also show high Sr values of up to 700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in several
samples. A similarly strong heterogeneity is observed for Ba (not shown),
which can reach <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in samples of the
metaconglomerate, indicating local enrichment of a Ba mineral, likely
baryte. In the case of the MCSC lenses and the metasedimentary rock, no
correlation exists between Sr and Ba. Whereas the behavior of Rb was
observed to be largely controlled by the behavior of K, Sr is only poorly
correlated with Ca in both the metasedimentary rocks (trend line with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the orthogneiss (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1325">REE(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>Y) distribution pattern of averages of samples from the
Pfitsch area; abbreviations are as follows: LQ is lazulite quartzite; ZG is Zentralgneis
(data from Finger et al., 1993); MS is mica schist; TG is tourmaline gneiss; PQ is pyrite quartzite; MCSC is magnetite–chloritoid–staurolite–chlorite lens. Normalization to
post-Archean Australian shale (PAAS) composition (normalization values from
Pourmand et al., 2012). Due to the very high quartz content of several
samples, all values were corrected for SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content (see text).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/33/401/2021/ejm-33-401-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1350">The high-field-strength elements (HFSEs) Ti, Nb, and Zr, assumed to be less
fluid-mobile and hosted in the sediments predominantly by heavy minerals
(e.g., rutile-anatase-brookite, ilmenite, and zircon), are poorly correlated
with Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4f, g; Nb not shown). Contents of Zr and Ti
reflect the amounts of detrital zircon and ilmenite, which are scattered and
also reflect maturity of the precursor sediments. However, TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is
broadly correlated with Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in all samples, with the
exception of the lazulite quartzite and the pyrite quartzite. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 : 10 TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> trend likely reflects the
relative abundance of primary ilmenite/Ti magnetite inherited from the
sediment source (Fig. 4g). Good correlation in the orthogneiss records the
preservation of a magmatic fractionation trend, since the low fluid mobility
of these elements implies limited movement during metamorphism.</p>
      <p id="d1e1454">Elevated concentrations of the trace elements Cr, V, (Fig. 4h) and Ni (not
shown) in sediments can be considered a signature of an ultramafic-mafic
source rock, such as the serpentinites. Chromium (and Ni) reaches its
highest values of up to 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the metaconglomerate and in the
lazulite quartzite. In the tourmaline gneiss, carbonate–mica schist, and
mica schist, these elements are generally positively correlated, with some
samples showing local enrichment in either V or Cr. Within the siliciclastic
rocks of the Pfitsch Formation, the tourmaline gneiss has low Cr (15 to 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), V (15 to 130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and Ni (up to 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
contents, but these are still much higher than in the orthogneiss, which has
values near or below the detection limit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in most samples. Most samples of the MCSC lenses are enriched in V.</p>
      <p id="d1e1566">Average REE(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>Y) patterns of the different rock units are shown normalized
to post-Archean Australian shale (PAAS; Fig. 5). The individual patterns for
the metasedimentary rocks differ mainly in terms of absolute REE contents,
due to the fact that quartz (with negligible REE content) varies greatly in
abundance in many samples. To account for this, we corrected all average REE
values by a factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wt % SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> wt % SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>PAAS</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. No REEs were determined for the highly heterogeneous
metaconglomerates. The data for the mica schist exclude a quartz-rich
sample (no. 28-14) with strong enrichment of the middle to heavy REEs and a
pronounced negative Eu anomaly. The reason for this unusual pattern in this
particular sample is its atypical enrichment of xenotime, determined by
X-ray mapping of the thin section (see Supplement 4.3.5 in Franz et al.,
2021). In some cases, individual patterns have different ratios of light to
heavy REEs, because the REE budget of the precursor sediments is controlled
mainly by the amount and type of heavy mineral, such as monazite (light REE-bearing), xenotime (heavy REE–Y-bearing), and zircon.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1619">Whole-rock B contents and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B-isotope values of samples
from the Pfitsch area. Zentralgneis, amphibolite, serpentinite,
Furtschagl schist, and pyrite quartzite (PQ) are samples from the basement.
The blue line limits the field of samples from the Pfitsch Formation. The
tourmaline gneiss (TG) has the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B-isotope value, but
mica schist (MS) and carbonate–mica schist (CMS) also show low values. The
lazulite quartzite (LQ) and the tourmalinite veins show values near to the
basement rocks, as well as the overlying marble. The high B contents of the
segregations and the tourmalinite outside the diagram are dominated by the
modal amount of tourmaline mixed with quartz, and the variation has no
petrogenetic significance.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/33/401/2021/ejm-33-401-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1650">There are no Ce anomalies in any of the analyzed rocks, suggesting a common
oxidation state in the sediments. The mica schist and tourmaline gneiss
patterns are flat, having abundance levels of ca. 1 for the light REEs,
including Eu, which has a slightly negative Eu anomaly (Eu <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Gd) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2. The middle to heavy REEs are slightly enriched. The orthogneiss,
representing the inferred proximal source area, has a flat pattern, with
total abundances slightly below that of PAAS, except for Sm and Eu that are
both close to 1. The lazulite quartzite shows a similar pattern to that of the
Zentralgneis, with total abundances below those of PAAS and with a slightly positive
Eu anomaly of 0.2. The MCSC lenses and pyrite quartzite both display steep
REE patterns, depleted in light REEs with REE contents increasing towards Lu. The
pyrite quartzite REE contents are consistently lower than the MCSC lenses,
except for Lu. In chondrite-normalized patterns (see Supplement 4.3.9 in Franz
et al., 2021) all units show a negative Eu anomaly, in line with the fact
that the Zentralgneis is one of the dominant<?pagebreak page409?> sources, most prominent in the REE
similarity to the lazulite quartzite and the Zentralgneis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Boron contents and B isotopes</title>
      <p id="d1e1689">The B contents and whole-rock <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B values are shown in Fig. 6
(for data see Franz et al., 2021). Average B contents in the Pfitsch
Formation (combined data for the tourmaline gneiss, mica schist, and
carbonate–mica schist) are 215 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; they are near 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
lazulite quartzite (Windtal Formation) and 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in marble from the
Aigerbach Formation. In contrast, the basement rocks (Zentralgneis,
amphibolite, and serpentinite from the roof pendant Altes Dach and
Furtschagl schist) all contain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of B (average 5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The B-isotope compositions vary widely, ranging from ca. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B, with the siliciclastic
metasedimentary rocks of the Pfitsch Formation having values below ca. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B. Values for the lazulite quartzite
and its associated tourmalinite veins are restricted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B, similar to those of the overlying
marble. In most of the basement rocks (including a tourmaline-bearing
quartz–feldspar segregation), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B tends towards more positive
values with the lowest value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B
measured in the Furtschagl schist.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Inferences about the protoliths</title>
      <p id="d1e1927">The protolith of metamorphic rocks can be constrained by the geochemical
fingerprint imparted by the sedimentary, metamorphic, or igneous precursor.
To be able to infer the sedimentary protoliths of the Pfitsch Formation, our
initial assumption is that the present metasedimentary rocks retain some
signature of the original sedimentary compositions. The composition of the
sedimentary precursor itself was altered from that of the hinterland rocks
through several processes, which began during chemical weathering,
continued during sediment mixing and transport along rivers and sorting during
sediment deposition, and ended with porewater interaction and diagenesis.</p>
      <p id="d1e1930">During regional metamorphism, deviation from isochemical deformation results
from element transport by metamorphic fluids and metamorphic
differentiation. In our study area, metasomatism and element mobility on a
small scale are evident in certain rock samples, such as the selvages
surrounding quartz nodules in the lazulite quartzite (Selverstone and Hyatt,
2003), or on the scale of tens of centimeters from rock to segregation as shown in
the tourmaline gneiss (Berryman et al., 2017). Blackwall zones around
serpentinite bodies (Trumbull et al., 2009) are another example of strong
metasomatism in the area. Large-scale fluid movement that significantly
changes the bulk composition is typically expressed in channels (e.g., Ague,
2011, and references therein). For instance, in the SW Tauern Window, the
Greiner shear zone channelized fluids into a narrow zone 2–10 m in width
(Selverstone et al., 1991), distinguished in the field by a macroscopically
visible change in mineralogy and fabric. Although the Greiner shear zone
extends into the Pfitscher Joch area (Fig. 1), channelized fluid flow is not
observed except in the hornblende garbenschist (Selverstone et al., 1984;
Steffen et al., 2001; Steffen and Selverstone, 2006). Within these basement
rocks, deformation was locally responsible for fluid access and chemical
alteration but did not pervasively change the chemical composition of the
rock unit. Moreover, even in the case of the high-pressure rocks of the
Tauern Window, fluid heterogeneities between rock layers on the millimeter-to
centimeter scale have been observed to persist during metamorphism (Selverstone et
al., 1992). Taken together, these observations support our assumption that
during regional, near-peak, and post-peak Alpine metamorphism – except for
the transition from diagenesis to low-grade metamorphism – pervasive fluid
movement and associated element mobility were limited, leaving the whole-rock
composition of the metasedimentary rocks largely intact. In addition, the
use of a large dataset from each rock series in our investigation allows the
average element values to cancel out the chemical signature of small-scale
element mobility.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1935">Chemical classification of metasedimentary units and from the
Pfitsch–Mörchner basin its basement, using average compositions of the
sample set (error bars indicate standard deviation). <bold>(a)</bold> Classification after Herron (1988); all units plot into the field of
coarse-grained protoliths; only the carbonate–mica schist plots into the field of
shale. <bold>(b)</bold> Geotectonic environment (Bhatia, 1983) using the mafic components and
TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The data plot close to the field for active continental margins;
the low TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents of lazulite quartzite and metaconglomerate at a
given MgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are explained by dominance of the whole-rock
composition by the Zentralgneis source; the high values of
TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for carbonate–mica schist indicate a higher
input of heavy minerals associated with the higher amount of clay (cf. panel <bold>a</bold>). <bold>(c)</bold> Average ratios of alkalies Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) (Na#;
wt %) and mafic components MgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (MgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Mg#; wt %).
The metaconglomerate can be explained as a mixture of Zentralgneis (ZG)
with amphibolite (using the average composition of the latter as given by
Dingeldey, 1992; Steffen and Selverstone, 2006) and serpentinite (dashed
arrows). The mica schists and the tourmaline gneiss indicate increasing
maturation of the fining-upwards series, and the lazulite quartzite has a
well-sorted composition with the lowest Na# and Mg#. Pyrite quartzites
(PQ) and the enclosed MCSC lenses represent only a small part of the source
rocks. <bold>(d)</bold> Weathering index of different rock series (average molar values, not
corrected for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; weathering trend according to Nesbitt and Young,
1984). Metaconglomerate, two types of Zentralgneis (Augenflasergneis is AFG,
and gneiss from the Rotbachlspitze is Rot), and feldspar-bearing
pyrite quartzite plot at the composition of the upper continental crust (UCC)
(Rudnick and Gao, 2003). The Schrammacher Gneis variety (SG) lies above the
feldspar line, indicating that weathering/alteration of the original
granitoid has already taken place. The pyrite quartzite and the MCSC lenses indicate strong
alteration.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/33/401/2021/ejm-33-401-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<?pagebreak page410?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Major-element sedimentary classification</title>
      <p id="d1e2139">The chemical composition confirms the differentiation of rock units based on
field criteria, except for the mica schist and the carbonate–mica schist.
Both of these rock types have similar large variations in element contents,
and the distinction made in the field by the ankerite–biotite aggregates of
the latter type is interpreted as local heterogeneities in an otherwise
compositionally similar sediment. Using the common classification diagrams
for sediments, we keep in mind the known geologic situation; i.e., the basin
was small and restricted in dimensions to not more than tens of kilometers
and was likely a continental, not marine, basin (Veselá and Lammerer,
2008). In the classification of Herron (1988), Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O
ratios are plotted as indicators for mafic to K-feldspar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mica components
and SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios are plotted for quartz to feldspar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mica
components. Data for the siliciclastic metasedimentary samples plot in the
field of arkose-wacke (Fig. 7a), except for the carbonate–mica schist, which
plots outside this region in the field of shale, indicating a higher pelitic
content of its protolith. Also, the lazulite quartzite is not a quartz
arenite but an arkose or litharenite, consistent with our interpretation of
a conglomeratic sandstone (however, we keep the term lazulite quartzite as
introduced in the literature for this rock). The metaconglomerate plots at
the border between shale and wacke, consistent with the interpretation of
Schön and Lammerer (1989) that the percentage of matrix in this rock is
high. Using the data in their Table 2, the matrix is calculated to represent
an average of 67.5 vol %  of the rock, increasing from 40 to almost 100 vol % from stratigraphic bottom to top. In such coarse-grained clastic
sedimentary rocks, heavy minerals such as zircon, Ti magnetite–ilmenite, and
TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> polymorphs control the distribution of the HFSEs (Fig. 4g). Based
on the relationship between TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the sum of MgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
used<?pagebreak page411?> to classify the geotectonic environment of sandstones (Bhatia, 1983),
these metasedimentary rocks are situated near the field of active
continental margins, transitional to the continental arc field (Fig. 7b).
The carbonate–mica schist is significantly richer in mafic
MgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and TiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents, comparable to oceanic arc
sediments. Keeping in mind the continental character of the basin, this
inferred mafic component is interpreted as a locally higher influence of
lacustrine (with a higher amount of pelitic material) vs. fluviatile sediments.
Data for the metaconglomerate and the lazulite quartzite do not plot in the
fields, and this may reflect the coarse-grained nature of their conglomerate
protoliths. The plot is designed for sandstones, and hence such values that
plot outside the designated fields are consistent with this interpretation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Protolith source rock</title>
      <p id="d1e2312">All of the analyzed rocks are highly variable in alkali and Mg–Fe contents,
as illustrated by the lack of correlation between
Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Na# and MgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (MgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Mg# (both in wt %) (Fig. 7c). However, this diagram is useful in showing
that the composition of the metaconglomerate can be represented as a mixture
of the Zentralgneis, amphibolite, and serpentinite, in complete accordance with
the pebble analysis of Schön and Lammerer (1989) and with the relatively
high Cr, Ni, and V contents of the metaconglomerate (Fig. 4h). Moving
up-section, the metasedimentary rocks show decreasing Na# and Mg# from
the metaconglomerate to mica schists and tourmaline gneiss to the lazulite
quartzite at the top of the unit. This trend is consistent with increasing
compositional maturation of the sediments, within a sedimentation cycle from
metaconglomerate to carbonate–mica schist, superimposed on a varying input
of the different source rocks in the protolith. The presence of high Cr–V
contents (Fig. 4h) and Ni contents throughout the whole series supports this
interpretation and argues against the hypothesis that the tourmaline gneiss
has a felsic volcanic protolith (Veselá et al., 2011). Whether a
rhyolitic volcanoclastic component was present in the sediments cannot be
reconstructed, as their chemical composition cannot be distinguished from
the granitoid rocks. The lazulite quartzite has the lowest Na# and
Mg# and, together with the high SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content, is interpreted as a
better-sorted, conglomeratic sandstone protolith having a more distal source
area compared to the units below. The MCSC lenses and the two varieties of
pyrite quartzite do not follow the geochemical trend of the metasedimentary
rocks, suggesting they are a part of the source rocks but probably representing
only a minor component.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><title>Chemical weathering and alteration trends</title>
      <p id="d1e2422">The metasedimentary series follow a trend parallel to a weathering trend in
terms of average relative molar CaO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O contents (CIA is chemical index of alteration; Fig. 7d,
following Nesbitt and Young, 1984; Fedo et al., 1995). Upper continental
crust (UCC; Rudnick and Gao, 2003) and unaltered granitoids generally have
an A value (for the Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content) near 50 (e.g., Oeser et al.,
2018). The orthogneiss varieties, as one of the likely major source areas
for the sedimentary protoliths, have values close to that of UCC, but
individual samples can be higher and especially the Schrammacher Gneis plots
towards muscovite–illite. As a result, it is possible that these source rocks
were already partially weathered. An alternative explanation involves
hydrothermal sericitization, because the formation of
sericite/kaolinite/pyrophyllite would produce a similar trend.</p>
      <p id="d1e2487">The values in the CIA plot (Fig. 7d) are not corrected for the presence of
carbonate due to the lack of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> determinations in our study. Several
individual metaconglomerate samples contain carbonate as observed in hand
samples (Fig. 3d; see also Schön and Lammerer, 1989). Moreover, some
samples from massive layers of the mica schist and tourmaline gneiss also
contain carbonate; hence the average Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content (Fig. 7d) is a
minimum value. Many of the individual samples of high-K tourmaline gneiss
show a trend from the orthogneiss towards the A–K side of the triangle, an
indication of K metasomatism, interpreted by Fedo et al. (1995) as
reflecting the production of authigenic K-feldspar and/or illite in the
clastic sediments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>3.1.4</label><title>REE signatures of metasedimentary rocks</title>
      <p id="d1e2525">The consistent REE pattern observed in the metasedimentary rocks is similar
to the average composition of the PAAS reference material (Fig. 5b) and
supports the premise that the Zentralgneis was a major source area
(normalization to North American shale composite shows the same, albeit less smooth, patterns). Although
only partial data are available for the Zentralgneis (Finger et al., 1993),
the REE signature indicates that its precursor is a common granitoid, with
Eu values close to 1 following PAAS normalization. The metasedimentary rocks
are distinguished from the Zentralgneis by the presence of a negative Eu
anomaly in the mica schist and tourmaline gneiss and a positive Eu anomaly
in the lazulite quartzite (Fig. 5b). Morteani and Ackermand (1996)
determined partial REE patterns for samples from the lazulite quartzite,
which varied depending on sample mineralogy. Our dataset is consistent with
their findings, both of which indicate a heterogeneous distribution of the
REE-bearing minerals (metamorphosed to Al–P–REE minerals of the
goyazite–svanbergite group) within these metasedimentary rocks.</p>
      <p id="d1e2528">The slightly positive Eu anomaly of the lazulite quartzite at the top of the
sedimentary sequence distinguishes it from the<?pagebreak page412?> stratigraphically lower
metasedimentary rocks, suggesting that its composition was influenced by
other processes such as greater sorting due to deposition from a more distal
source area. Its protolith was discussed by Morteani and Ackermand (1996)
as most likely a conglomeratic sandstone (based on relict sedimentary
structures) from a sabkha-like environment. Deposition in a sabkha-like
environment, which explains the partly high B, Sr, and Ba contents (Fig. 4e), is similar to our explanation for the protolith as a phosphatic
sandstone related to sedimentary facies change, characterized by having
Al–P minerals from the florencite–goyazite–crandallite–svanbergite group.
Such sediments (generally characterized by Rasmussen, 1996) may locally
contain high amounts of P; can be metamorphosed to lazulite-bearing
quartzites; and have been observed, e.g., from Proterozoic unconformity-related
U deposits in Australia (Gaboreau et al., 2005) and many other localities,
summarized by Morteani et al. (2006). We adopt this hypothesis as the most
likely explanation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2531">The REE signatures of the pyrite quartzite and associated MCSC lenses, the
base of the sedimentary profile in the SE limb (Fig. 2), are also distinct
from those of common metasedimentary rocks (PAAS and the majority of the
Pfitsch Formation), which is not consistent with the interpretation of the
geological map of the Brenner Basistunnel as Triassic quartzites (Brandner
et al., 2011). Analysis of the zoning in zircon crystals (Supplement 4.3.7 in Franz et al., 2021) also shows typical hydrothermal alteration zones in
otherwise igneous zircon crystals. The MCSC lenses have been interpreted by
Barrientos and Selverstone (1987) as a lateritic paleosol, based on high
Fe contents and their position near the base of the metasedimentary unit. In
this context, the pyrite quartzite could be viewed as having formed in a
deep weathering horizon, but both rock types are strongly depleted in light
REEs, a pattern that is not typical of a weathering profile. Relative to
their unweathered counterparts, weathered rocks tend to be enriched in REEs,
with a high ratio of light to heavy REEs due to the absorbance capacity of
clay minerals and Fe oxides/hydroxides for light REEs (e.g., Aubert et al.,
2001; Foley and Ayuso, 2015; Padrones et al., 2017). Soils enriched in heavy
REEs relative to light REEs also occur (e.g., Bao and Zhao, 2008), but they are the
exception even within weathering profiles and are unlikely to explain the
distinct REE signatures of the MCSC lenses and pyrite quartzite (Fig. 5). We
interpret the unusual REE patterns of the pyrite quartzite with the MCSC
lenses (Fig. 5) as reflecting protoliths of felsic igneous rocks that were
hydrothermally altered, because similar (chondrite-normalized) REE patterns
were observed in hydrothermally altered igneous rocks. For example, a large
dataset of hydrothermally altered dacitic rocks from a volcanic arc in
Turkey compiled by Karakaya et al. (2010) shows that alteration can produce
REE patterns very similar to those observed herein. Lottermoser (1992)
pointed out that such a strong depletion requires a high fluid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rock ratio
during alteration. Kyanite quartzites in the USA from Virginia and the
Carolinas (Owens and Paseck, 2007; Owens and Hollingsworth, 2018) were
interpreted as metamorphosed hydrothermally altered igneous rocks, which
have similar REE patterns to those studied here, albeit less strongly
depleted in the light REEs. The extremely low ratio of light to heavy REEs
observed in our samples might have been reinforced during dewatering
reactions of the alteration minerals during metamorphism, when light REEs are
more mobile than heavy REEs (e.g., Brunsmann et al., 2001).</p>
      <p id="d1e2541">Because the whole metasedimentary sequence is part of the Greiner shear zone
(depicted in Behrmann, 1988, and Behrmann and Frisch, 1990, as a 1–2 km wide
strongly sheared zone), an alternative protolith for the pyrite quartzite
would be the Zentralgneis, locally hydrothermally altered during shearing,
similar to the Zentralgneis further east (at Stilluptal; Selverstone et al.,
1991). In the Pfitscher Joch area, Barnes et al. (2004) characterize the
shear zone rocks along the northwestern limb within the Zentralgneis as
localized zones, up to 10 m wide, with a pronounced shear foliation and
characterized by an increase in phengite and biotite, with millimeter-sized garnets.
In the area between Stilluptal and Pfitscher Joch, they describe numerous
other shear zones, based on the abundance of chloritites, biotitites, and
biotite–chlorite schists, superficially resembling common pelitic rocks.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2547">Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K vs. K as indicator of metamorphic and pre-metamorphic
processes on protoliths. Plotted are average values from metasediments and
basement of the Pfitsch–Mörchner basin. The large scatter of Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K and
the variable and high K contents of the Pfitsch Formation
(tourmaline gneiss, mica schist, carbonate–mica schist) are explained by being
partly inherited from the source rock, dominated by Zentralgneis types,
overprinted by variable intensity of diagenetic illite and/or K-feldspar formation
(see text). The low values of Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K for the pyrite quartzite, especially the
feldspar-bearing variety, and its MCSC lenses are consistent with the
interpretation that their protoliths were hydrothermally altered rocks.
Abbreviations for Zentralgneis: ZG Rot is Zillertal unit, from Rotbachlspitze;
ZG AFG is Tux unit, Augenflasergneis; ZG SG is Schrammacher Gneis, Tux
unit; dashed arrows indicate the influence of hydrothermal alteration and
weathering on protoliths (Oeser et al., 2017; UCC is upper continental
crust from Rudnick and Gao, 2003). Examples for hydrothermal alteration of
granitoids and granitoid-derived deposits are (grey open squares, listed
from high to low Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K) Asarel, Bulgaria (Hikov, 2013); Horn Mine, Virginia, USA
(Owens and Paseck, 2007); Loma Blanca, Argentina (Marfil et al., 2010); Oyu
Tolgoi, Mongolia (Kashgerel et al., 2001); and Sanshandao, China (Li et al., 2013), which
is given as an example of enrichment of K during hydrothermal alteration of
granitoids.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/33/401/2021/ejm-33-401-2021-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Behavior of Rb–K</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Hydrothermal alteration of pyrite quartzite and MCSC lenses protoliths</title>
      <p id="d1e2600">The behavior of Rb and K yields additional information on protoliths and the
processes that led to present compositions (Fig. 8). From a crystal chemical
point of view, Rb is strongly coupled to K. In equilibrium with hydrous
fluids,
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M228" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Rb</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>hydrous fluid</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>K</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>mineral</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>K</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>hydrous fluid</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Rb</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>mineral</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <?pagebreak page413?><p id="d1e2636">Rb fractionates preferentially into mica and feldspar (experimental data at
600 to 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; Melzer and Wunder, 2000, 2001; Tauson et al.,
2001) due to the ideal ionic radius of Rb for substitution in mica and
feldspar structures. Measured data in formation waters from the Appalachian
Basin (Osborne et al., 2012) show that this trend is also valid at low
temperatures; all hydrous fluids (formation waters) are significantly
enriched in K relative to Rb. A low value of Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.004 is therefore
typical of UCC and corresponds to K <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 (expressed in mass %). An
increase in Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K in a rock can occur with strong fluid–rock interactions,
such as shearing with the production of mica, or during weathering with the
production of illite. A smaller Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K, shifting equilibrium (1) to the left,
can occur if the activity of water in the hydrous fluid is significantly
reduced, e.g., by other fluid components such as Cl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during processes such as diagenesis with basin brines or hydrothermal alteration.</p>
      <p id="d1e2715">The variable Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K ratios and K contents in the rock units from the Pfitsch
area are distinctive (Fig. 8). Weathering with loss of K is expected to
increase Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K up to values near 0.010 (Oeser et al., 2017). Shearing also
produces an increase in Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003 to 0.005,
accompanied by an increase in K from 2.7 wt % to 6.3 wt % K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (data
from Selverstone et al., 1991, for the Greiner shear zone). We have shown
above that the trend of the weathering index of the pyrite quartzite (Fig. 7d)
can alternatively be explained by sericitization or pyrophyllite formation,
typical of hydrothermal alteration of felsic igneous rocks, and examination
of Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K values serves as an additional indication of hydrothermal
alteration, decoupling it from a weathering profile or a shear zone. There
are many examples in the literature that illustrate the effect of
hydrothermal alteration on granitoids and their associated mineral deposits:
e.g., Oyu Tolgoi (Mongolia; Kashgerel et al., 2001), Loma Blanca (Argentina;
Marfil et al., 2010), Horne mine (Quebec, Canada; MacLean and Hoy, 1991),
and Azarel (Bulgaria; Hikov, 2013). All show Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K ratios that are typically
lower than or equal to those of UCC. Note, however, that the nature of
hydrothermal alteration (e.g., silicification, advanced argillic alteration,
alunite or pyrite sericitization, propylitization, and K metasomatism) and associated products can be quite variable. The host rock to the
Sanshandao gold deposit in China (Li et al., 2013) serves as an example of a
granitoid that experienced K enrichment during alteration but also with
decreasing Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K (Fig. 8). Examples from the literature show that the
presence of kyanite quartzites with pyrite can be explained as the
metamorphic equivalent of rocks that experienced argillic alteration
(Virginia Plutonic Belt, USA; Owens and Paseck, 2007; Owens and
Hollingsworth, 2018). The conceptual model that hydrothermally altered
granitoids are the protoliths for the pyrite quartzite is also in line with
the pervasive S enrichment (up to almost 1 wt % SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) either directly
with formation of pyrite or as sulfates such as alunite
KAl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(OH)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which were reduced during metamorphism
to pyrite.</p>
      <p id="d1e2820">In the case of the Pfitsch–Mörchner basement, the Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K ratios of the pyrite quartzite and MCSC lenses are lower than that of UCC, suggesting that
the protolith experienced hydrothermal alteration prior to metamorphism. The
excellent correlation of the Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K ratios with K (Fig. 4d) for these rocks
indicates well-equilibrated rocks, consistent with alteration at high
fluid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> rock ratios. Our interpretation is in line with the report of argillic
alteration of the Zentralgneis during formation of the molybdenite deposit
at the Alpeinerscharte (see Fig. 1; Mostler et al., 1982; Melcher et al.,
1996). The mineral assemblage of the MCSC lenses
(staurolite–magnetite–chloritoid within the quartzite) could then represent
mafic (amphibolitic) enclaves in such rocks, as described in the Zillertal
Zentralgneis further east in the Greiner shear zone (Selverstone et al.,
1991). The unusual REE patterns with extremely low light REEs of the pyrite
quartzite and the MCSC lenses (Fig. 5) are also consistent with our
interpretation that the protoliths of these rocks were hydrothermally
altered, felsic, igneous rocks. Because the entire series underlies the
metaconglomerate, these rocks must have been near to the erosional surface
before deposition of the Pfitsch metasedimentary rocks and therefore likely
experienced the additional influence of weathering superimposed on the
hydrothermal signature.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Diagenetic signature in the tourmaline gneiss and mica schists</title>
      <p id="d1e2852">The tourmaline gneiss and, to a lesser extent, the mica schists stand out
with high K contents, up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 wt % K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 wt % K), and quite variable Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K ratios of 0.002 to
0.008 (Figs. 4d, 8). This composition partly reflects the inferred source
rocks, which also have Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K ratios that vary between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.003
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.008. Weathering is less likely to<?pagebreak page414?> be an important
process, as it would generally lead to K depletion, rather than enrichment.
Instead, it has been shown that during diagenesis of mudstone–sandstone
strata at temperatures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O contents can increase from averages of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 wt % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 wt % up to a maximum of 9 wt % (e.g., Day-Sirrat et al., 2010). Thyne (2001) developed a model for
diagenetic mass transfer between sandstone and shale and clearly showed
that within a single rock unit, depending on porosity and the initial
distribution of illite and authigenic K-feldspar, significant transport of K
over a scale of several meters is possible. In order to explain the high K
contents in the tourmaline gneiss, we refer to a model developed by Leising
et al. (1995) for Tertiary basins in New Mexico and Arizona. In these
lacustrine, intramontane environments, evaporation-induced dense brines can
form descending, density-driven plumes, provided that the porosity of the
rocks allows vertical convection. This process has been identified as a
cause of strong K metasomatism leading to the formation of arkosic rocks
with 8 wt %–12 wt % K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (Leising et al., 1995) and is in line with the
elevated K contents observed throughout the Pfitsch Formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2963">Diagenesis can also fractionate Rb from K, leading to depletion of Rb
relative to K and low Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K ratios. For example, Brueckner and Snyder (1985)
reported decreasing Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K ratios from 0.006 to 0.0015 in siliceous sediments
as a result of diagenesis. A similar trend was observed by Land et al. (1997) for a sandstone having a composition close to that of UCC down to an
Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.002. The variation in the Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K ratio of the
tourmaline gneiss in the Pfitscher Joch area (0.004–0.008) is therefore
interpreted to reflect (i) variation in the source rocks and (ii) variable
enrichment in diagenetic illite/K-feldspar (Day-Stirrat et al., 2010). As a
result, diagenesis can produce changes to the whole-rock composition that
are much more significant than those that occurred during Alpine
greenschist to amphibolite facies metamorphism, because porosity in a
sediment allows for pervasive fluid transport, whereas in metamorphic rocks
pervasive fluid transport is limited except where focused or channeled in
shear zones or faults (e.g., Skelton et al., 1995).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>The B and B-isotope record </title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Boron in the basement units </title>
      <p id="d1e3017">The final B-isotope composition of the metasedimentary rocks reflects three
major stages: (1) detrital B inherited from the source rocks; (2) interaction of unlithified sediments with (sub)surface fluids during
transport, sedimentation, and early to late diagenesis; and (3) mobilization
and fractionation during metamorphism. Before conclusions can be drawn from
the B-isotope signature of the metasedimentary rocks, the inventory of the B
and B-isotope record must be unraveled for each of these stages. We have
shown that protoliths of the Zentralgneis and its country rocks served as
the main sources for the metasedimentary protoliths. The B and B-isotope
signatures of the different basement rocks are relatively distinct (Fig. 6),
having an average B concentration of 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 ‰. The Zentralgneis has <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B values from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.5 ‰, which is within
the range commonly observed for S- and A-type granitoids (Trumbull et al.,
2020); the blackwall zones around serpentinite bodies have B-isotope values
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.5 ‰; a similar range is reported for
blackwall zones at the Habachtal serpentinite further east of the Pfitscher
Joch area (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 ‰; Trumbull et al., 2008). Only
the Furtschagl schist, the lowermost unit below the Zentralgneis in the SE,
has a notably light isotope signature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.1 ‰ (Fig. 6), but there is no indication that these rocks represent an important part
of the sedimentary source (Schön and Lammerer, 1989; discussion above).
The B-isotope value of the pyrite quartzite is slightly more negative than the
Zentralgneis unit (Fig. 6), which is consistent with the interpretation of
its protolith as a hydrothermally altered granitoid, with small isotope
fractionation occurring during alteration and Alpine metamorphism.</p>
      <p id="d1e3120">The average whole-rock B contents of the basement (6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are low
compared to those of the tourmaline gneiss and mica schists (215 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of B) and even lower than the average B content of UCC (17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Rudnick
and Gao, 2003). Although tourmaline has been observed in segregations (such
as sample PJ101 and a tourmaline-bearing segregation in the pyrite
quartzite, sample PJ49a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>53) and in the blackwall rocks near serpentinites,
it is generally rare. Due to a minor detrital tourmaline component, we
conclude that detrital B input is governed by B hosted in muscovite–illite
in the original sediments, and hence the contribution of a clastic
sedimentary source to the overall B budget of the Pfitsch Formation is
negligible.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>B in the metasedimentary units</title>
      <?pagebreak page415?><p id="d1e3199">Most of the metasedimentary rocks display <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B signatures
distinctly lower than those of the basement rocks (Fig. 6) and have high
average B contents of 215 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, hosted by tourmaline. In our previous
study (Berryman et al., 2017), we showed that tourmaline in the tourmaline
gneiss and mica schist is metamorphic in origin, forming on both the
prograde and the retrograde paths. As prograde metamorphism of sedimentary rocks
is typically associated with net removal of B by fluids expelled through
dehydration reactions (Bebout and Graham, 2007; Bebout and Nakamura, 2003),
the addition of B in the metasedimentary rocks of the Pfitscher Joch area
must have occurred prior to Alpine metamorphism. A likely process of B
acquisition is by adsorption onto clay minerals and by subsequent
incorporation into illite in tetrahedral coordination (Williams et al.,
2001) from subsurface waters circulating in the sediments during diagenesis,
such that the B content of the sediments correlates with the clay fraction.
This explanation is consistent with local variation in B contents within the
tourmaline gneiss. For instance, a sample with a gneissic fabric
(sample no. 28-17) has a low Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K ratio (0.0038), contrasted by a sample with a
schistose fabric (no. 28-11) and higher Rb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K (0.0067). As per Sect. 3.2
above, the protolith of the latter sample shows a stronger diagenetic
signature and hence likely had a greater amount of clay, which additionally
explains its higher B content (516 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.4 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B) relative to the gneissic sample
(165 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B). Local
variations in the abundance of tourmaline can be attributed to variations in
the B content of the protoliths, which in turn is affected by prevalence of
illite with a relatively fixed B content (adsorbed B is likely lost to the
fluid during early diagenesis; Williams et al., 2001). The metaconglomerate
is the coarse-grained basis of a fining-upwards sedimentary sequence and
indeed shows the lowest whole-rock B contents (7.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of B at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.8 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B), which is only slightly higher than
the average whole-rock B content of the basement rocks (5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of B).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>3.3.3</label><title>B source</title>
      <p id="d1e3392">The B-isotope signatures of the metasedimentary rocks can provide insight
into the source of the B that was deposited during diagenesis of the
protoliths. Trumbull et al. (2020) showed that marine evaporites have
B-isotope signatures of ca. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 ‰ to 40 ‰ whereas those
of non-marine evaporites are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 ‰. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33 ‰ to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B signature of the metasedimentary
rocks in the study area is therefore most consistent with deposition in a
continental, lacustrine basin. Clastic sediments have a similar range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 ‰
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 ‰) to non-marine evaporites, but since major
detrital B input is unlikely (see above), the high B contents point to high
levels of evaporation. Evaporites have been reported to occur up-section in
the lazulite quartzite of the Windtal Formation (Morteani and Ackermand,
1996) and in marble of the Aigerbach Formation (Vesalá and Lammerer,
2008), in agreement with the low latitudes of 0 to 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N of the
area during the Permo-Triassic (Scotese and Schettino, 2013). Our proposal
of evaporation-induced, dense brines that formed descending, density-driven
plumes (Leising et al., 1995), suggested as a cause of strong K metasomatism
leading to the formation of arkosic rocks with 8 wt %–12 wt % K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, is also
considered responsible for the observed high B content and the very low
B-isotope signature.</p>
      <p id="d1e3474">Boron minerals from evaporitic deposits show a wide range of B-isotope
ratios; e.g., Kasemann et al. (2016) reported values from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 ‰ to 0 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B for borates of the Andean salt lakes
in Argentina and in part heavier values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 ‰ to 0 ‰)
in the geothermal fluids. Assuming such fluids represent a source of the
locally high B contents in the Pfitsch–Mörchner basin and their
diagenetic interaction in descending brines with clay minerals,
fractionation of B isotopes between fluid and clay minerals on the order of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B (increasing with
decreasing temperature; Williams et al., 2001) can explain both the partly
extreme values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33 ‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B and the
large isotopic variation. The ultimate source of B is probably related to
igneous volcanic arc rocks and their geothermal fluids.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS4">
  <label>3.3.4</label><title>Tourmalinite veins in the lazulite quartzite</title>
      <p id="d1e3554">The origin of the hydrothermal tourmalinite veins is enigmatic. Many
tourmalinites are genetically related to hydrothermal events associated with
felsic igneous rocks and ore deposits (Slack and Trumbull, 2011; Trumbull et
al., 2020); hence their formation could be assigned to hydrothermal activity
during intrusion of the Zentralgneis protolith and associated volcanic
activity. However, the relative ages exclude a genetic relation to the
Zentralgneis, which is much older (Carboniferous to Permian) than the
metasedimentary rocks. Tourmalinite veins appear throughout the
metasedimentary unit ranging from the metaconglomerate to the Lower Triassic
lazulite quartzite (Fig. 3g, h). These veins cut the original bedding (Fig. 3i; Supplement 4.3.6 in Franz et al., 2021, and figures in Henry et al., 2002),
which requires that the precursor sediments were already consolidated and
lithified at the time of tourmalinite emplacement and which distinguishes
them from stratabound tourmalinites in meta-evaporite sequences as described
by Henry et al. (2008), formed during early diagenesis.</p>
      <p id="d1e3557">Tourmaline in the tourmalinite veins is commonly very fine grained
(typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m; Fig. 3i), with the exception of crystals up
to 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m in size that occur in strongly Alpine-deformed tourmalinite
clasts (Henry et al., 2002). This distinguishes the tourmalinites from (1) prograde metamorphic tourmaline in the metasediments and (2) tourmaline
crystals from Alpine fissures and segregations, found elsewhere in the
Pfitscher Joch that formed post-peak on the retrograde path. Since these are
millimeters to centimeters in length (Berryman et al., 2017), the very fine grained nature of
the tourmalinites is incompatible with a formation during Alpine
peak retrograde metamorphism.</p>
      <p id="d1e3590">Instead, the small crystal size of the tourmalinites points to the
tourmalinites being remnants of a quenched B-rich fluid, and their bimodal
character with tourmaline-rich and quartz-rich layers indicates that they
exsolved from a homogenous B-rich fluid into a B-rich and a silicate-rich
phase. Experimental investigations of B solubility in the system
Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O–B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O have proved the existence of
immiscible and colloidal Na–B silicate liquids at 520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C/1.5 kbar
and Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O contents of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 wt % (Smirnov et al., 2005). The
fact that tourmalinite formation in the Pfitscher Joch must have occurred at
much lower temperatures somewhere above zeolite-facies conditions (Henry et
al., 2002) and below the peak metamorphic temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C is not a counterargument here, because fluid immiscibility has
also been observed at temperatures between 200 and 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(Kravchuk and Valyashko, 1979; Valyashko, 1990). The latter experiments were
performed in the B-free system Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O-SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, but following
the interpretations of Smirnov et al. (2005), the occurrence of a fluid
solvus is not related to B<?pagebreak page416?> but rather restricted to systems having elevated
Na concentrations. Assuming a temperature of 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and given the
Na content in the earliest generation of tourmaline in the tourmalinite (0.7 Na pfu; Henry et al., 2002), the extrapolated partitioning coefficients
derived by von Goerne et al. (2001) indicate an Na concentration of 0.5 mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(3.1 wt % Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) in the fluid. This is just above the threshold of the
Na content postulated by Smirnov et al. (2005) required for forming a
colloidal Na–B silicate liquid.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3750">Schematic cross sections of the Pfitsch–Mörchner basin at the
Permian <bold>(a)</bold> and Triassic <bold>(b)</bold> (not to scale). Sedimentation of the Pfitsch
Formation started with coarse conglomerates (preserved as metaconglomerate, MC) from proximal source rocks, the Variscan mountain chain with
dominantly granites, partly with hydrothermal alteration (e.g., the
molybdenite deposit at the Alpeinerscharte; cf. Fig. 1) in the Tux unit.
The roof pendant of the granites consists of gneiss, amphibolite (A), and
serpentinite (S). During the Permian, the sedimentary protoliths (especially
for tourmaline gneiss, TG, and mica schist, MS, and carbonate–mica schist, CMS) of the closed, intramontane basin with evaporitic deposits were
influenced by diagenetic descending, highly saline brines, which caused K
and B metasomatism. The Triassic marks the transition from a closed to an
open basin with deposition of well-sorted (distal transport) conglomeratic
phosphatic sandstone (protolith of the lazulite quartzite, LQ, Windtal
Formation), possibly connected with a disconformity, overlain by
shallow-water carbonates (Aigerbach Formation marble horizon). Formation of
tourmalinite veins is due to hydrothermal circulation of B-rich pore waters
in the basin. Increased heat flow in the basin is produced by intrusion of
mafic dikes into the Tux branch of the granites.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/33/401/2021/ejm-33-401-2021-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3765">Concerning the B source for the tourmalinites, the dense brines, which in
our model caused the K metasomatism and B enrichment in the tourmaline
gneiss and mica schist unit, are the most likely candidates. We hypothesize
that B from these pre-enriched sedimentary units was mobilized in pore
waters and concentrated by hydrothermal fluids, from which an Na–B-rich
silicate liquid exsolved and formed the tourmalinites by reaction with
Al-rich country rocks. In contrast, mobilization of B from the lazulite
quartzite into a vein is unlikely. This is concluded from the decrease in B
concentration from 193 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.4 ‰) in the lazulite quartzite close to a tourmalinite
vein to 29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of B (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.9 ‰) in
the more distal lazulite quartzites, which rather points to the opposite
movement of B from the vein into the lazulite quartzite. The tourmalinite
precursor fluid was also enriched in isotopically heavy B, because
tourmalinite veins in the study area have a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.88 ‰, which is lower than those of any of the
metasedimentary whole-rock values in the Pfitsch area. Given the decrease in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B of the lazulite quartzite with increasing distance to the
tourmalinite vein, the lazulite quartzite likely had a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B
signature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.9 ‰, probably close
to those of the tourmaline gneiss and mica schists.</p>
      <p id="d1e3893">If deposition of the tourmalinites during peak and post-peak Alpine
metamorphism can be excluded, their formation must have occurred during a
hydrothermal event unrelated to this metamorphism. There is growing evidence
in the Alps for Permian and later hydrothermal events and/or metamorphism
(review in Schuster and Stüwe, 2018) and magmatism (e.g., Yuan et al.,
2020). In the Collio basin of the Orobic Alps (to the southwest of the
Tauern Window), this magmatism is also associated with tourmalinization (De
Capitani et al., 1999) and tourmalinites (Slack et al., 1996). In the
Pfitscher Joch area, the (now-metamorphosed) mafic dike swarm within the
Zentralgneis (Fig. 3b) might be a remnant of such an event. The intrusion of
these basalts has not been dated, but comparison with mafic magmatism in
similar basins south and north of the Tauern Window hints at a Triassic age
(see discussion below).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Implications for paleogeography and regional geology</title>
      <p id="d1e3905">The chemical signatures of the metasedimentary rocks of the
Pfitsch–Mörchner basin allow us to reconstruct the following
pre-metamorphic history. At the time of sediment erosion and transport, the
crystalline basement, consisting of granitoids and related roof pendants
with amphibolites, serpentinites, and gneisses, was exposed to an arid to
semi-arid climate, likely characterized by strong physical weathering (Fig. 9). This is in line with the low latitudes for the position of this part of
Eurasian continental crust at the Permian–Triassic (Scotese and Schettino,
2017). Portions of the granitoids might have experienced strong hydrothermal
alteration and weathering, with such rocks then being transformed during
Alpine metamorphism into the characteristic pyrite quartzite. According to
chemical classifications of the metasedimentary rocks, the hinterland was a
continental volcanic arc, in line with subduction-related magmatism
producing the Zentralgneis granitoids (e.g., Finger et al., 1993; Cesare et
al., 2001) and the associated, porphyry-related molybdenite deposit (Melcher
et al., 1996). The presence of coarse conglomerates and breccias on the base
of this major erosional nonconformity supports a proximal position of the
sediment source area. A closed intramontane Permian basin (Veselá and
Lammerer, 2008, and references therein) is completely in accordance with the
data as are the high B contents and very low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B values,
typical of lacustrine, saline basins. Sedimentation was dominated by
fluvial–lacustrine sediments, with indications of organic-rich sediments being
absent. The interpretation here of the tourmaline-bearing gneiss as a
meta-arkose, in contrast to a meta-rhyolite protolith by Veselá and
Lammerer (2008), is important. Within our metasedimentary interpretation,
the zircons from this unit dated by Veselá et al. (2011) are proposed as
detrital. The presence of zircon indicates volcanism in the source area,
defining a maximum age of sedimentation as 280 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 Ma.</p>
      <p id="d1e3926">On top of the Pfitsch Formation, a sedimentary facies change is represented
by the Windtal lazulite quartzite with distal transport producing the
well-sorted sediment, possibly already existing near the seashore, as
hypothesized by Morteani and Ackermand (1996) in a saline lagoon, or sabkha,
environment (Fig. 9). Further east, in the Slovenian Karawanken mountains,
marine shallow-water carbonates at the Permian–Triassic boundary are exposed
in the Brsnina section (Williams et al., 2021) and are also explained as
deposited at hypersaline conditions in a sabkha. It remains open if the
transition from the Pfitsch Formation to the Windtal Formation is a sequence boundary
or a disconformity (with a period of no deposition), but phosphatic
sandstones, metamorphosed into Al–P quartzite (Morteani et al., 2007), are
often associated with unconformities. From a similar continental setting in
the Cañizar and Eslida formations of the south Iberian range (Spain),
Galán-Abellán et al. (2013) described Early Triassic Al–P sandstones
and the development of Al–P minerals during early diagenetic interaction
with acidic meteoric waters. There are numerous other reports of Al–P
sandstones related to unconformities, e.g., Gaboreau et al. (2005, 2007) from
Proterozoic basins in Canada and Australia and Pe-Piper and Dolansky (2005)
from the terrestrial Cretaceous Chaswood Formation in Nova Scotia, Canada.
Hall et al. (1997) identified Al–P minerals on a former karstic erosional
surface, derived from the leaching and dissolution of pre-depositional
carbonates (Pennsylvanian Cheltenham Formation, Missouri, USA), and Mordberg
et al. (2000) described Al–P minerals in a Devonian bauxitic weathering
profile on Precambrian alkaline rocks in the Timan Range, northern European
Russia. In the Pfitsch–Mörchner basin, lazulite quartzite marks the
transition from a closed intramontane basin to an open basin, possibly
connected with a disconformity. The depositional age of this and the next
unit above, the Aigerbach Formation marble, is not restricted by radiometric
age data, but comparison with the sedimentary record on the northern,
Eurasian part of the basement allows for the hypothesis in which they are
Early and Middle Triassic (Lammerer, 1986), corresponding to the classic
“Germanic trilogy Buntsandstein–Muschelkalk–Keuper”. Radiogenic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Sr for the marble and the Pfitsch Formation (Supplement
4.3.3 in Franz et al., 2021), which were<?pagebreak page418?> determined to check for a
stratigraphic correlation, are in line with this hypothesis but due to the
likely influence of Rb in the marble do not allow a more detailed
interpretation.</p>
      <p id="d1e3954">South of the Pfitscher Joch area in the South Alpine realm, other
unmetamorphosed or only slightly metamorphosed Permo-Mesozoic sedimentary
basins are known, such as the Collio and Tione basins. In the Tione basin
near the city of Trento, a sedimentary sequence of similar age was described
by Cortesogno et al. (1998). Its basement also consists of late Hercynian
granitoids (“Dos del Sabion”) with diverse metamorphic country rocks (cf. Zentralgneis with Altes Dach). The cover sequence begins with coarse
fluvial–lacustrine deposits of the Permian Collio Formation (cf. metaconglomerates of the Pfitsch Formation), separated by an unconformity
from the overlying medium- to coarse-grained Val Daone conglomerates (cf. mica schist unit and tourmaline gneiss). This sequence leads into the
detrital Verrucano Lombardo–Val Gardena deposits, which are covered by Lower
Triassic sandstones and limestone of the Servino Formation (cf. lazulite
quartzite and Aigerbach Formation marble). However, there are also
significant differences among these sequences, because the Tione basin
contains a large amount of dacitic to andesitic volcanic rocks, which are
absent in the Pfitscher Joch area.</p>
      <p id="d1e3957">The Permo-Triassic was a time of major extensional stress, which affected
Eurasia in the western European domain (Nikishin et al., 2002), producing
several terrestrial basins in the Southern Alps. Cassinis et al. (2008)
documented mafic magmatism throughout these basins and their crystalline
basements, occurring as mafic dike swarms/sills having a Late Triassic age
of 217 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 Ma (Ar–Ar dating) in the Tione basin. In the Collio basin to
the west, Feijth (2002) determined the Ar–Ar age of detrital white mica and
interpreted ages of 270 to 255 Ma and 250 to 180 Ma as records of
hydrothermal events. In line with these observations, the metamorphosed
dikes in the Zentralgneis of the Pfitscher Joch area would represent
analogous igneous activity of the 217 Ma mafic dike swarms, with the
tourmalinite veins resulting from this early Mesozoic hydrothermal activity.
A similar but marine setting has been described in the Austroalpine nappes
north of the Tauern Window, in the evaporitic Haselgebirge Formation of the
northern calcareous Alps (Schorn et al., 2013). These authors reported upper
Permian (to lowermost Triassic) crystallization ages of ca. 270 to 248 Ma
for dolerite dikes, interpreted as indications of the incipient rifting and
opening of the ancient Meliata Ocean after the Variscan orogeny. A
metagabbro of oceanic affinity in the Tauern Window yielded an intrusion age
of 157 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 Ma (Gleißner et al., 2021), consistent with other ages
of 167 to 156 Ma along the Alpine chain (Schaltegger et al., 2002, and
references therein) testifying to an already-open ocean during the Jurassic.
Initial (earlier) basaltic magmatism of this spreading event might have also left
traces on the passive continental margin during the opening of the
Valais Ocean on the European basement, in our field area represented by the
Zentralgneis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Concluding remarks</title>
      <p id="d1e3983">In summary, our study shows that the geochemical signature of
metasedimentary rocks allows determining the protoliths, diagenetic
processes in the sediments, and some conclusions about the source region. We
emphasize that
(1) the chemical signature of the sedimentary protoliths was largely
preserved during regional metamorphism and (2) individual samples may differ
greatly in whole-rock geochemistry, but using averages of a sufficiently
large sample set we can show that the metasedimentary rocks represent a
mixture of the different rock types of the source area, as demonstrated by
Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) and MgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (MgO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) ratios.
The trace elements Cr, V, and Ni can also identify components derived from
mafic–ultramafic source rocks. REE patterns of individual metamorphic rock
samples are difficult to interpret (due to heterogeneous distribution of
REE-rich minerals in sediment), but if averages of a unit are used, these
can clearly distinguish metasedimentary rocks with an upper continental
crustal signature from hydrothermally altered rocks by their steep pattern
with rising contents from La to Lu.</p>
      <p id="d1e4060">Diagenetic processes in the sediment can be reconstructed via chemical
signatures; the behavior of fluid-mobile elements K, Rb, and Sr
is especially helpful in identifying pre-metamorphic processes. This insight is due to
the crystal chemical coupling of Rb to K and the preferential fractionation
of Rb into mica/feldspar over hydrous fluid. Any decoupling of K and Rb
requires unusual fluid compositions such as Cl-rich saline brines or
hydrothermal fluids rich in S. This is in contrast to the behavior of Sr,
which always preferentially partitions into a hydrous fluid. Although Sr is
generally coupled to Ca, the presence of Sr minerals such as strontianite or
celestite can cause a strong decoupling.</p>
      <p id="d1e4063">K metasomatism of the sediments is preserved in the metamorphic product and
is responsible for the large variation and locally strong enrichment in
K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O. Potassium and Sr are fixed in mica and feldspar, and although
generally considered fluid-mobile during metamorphism, the variation
caused by metamorphism is less important than that produced by diagenesis.
This K metasomatism is also considered responsible for B enrichment in the
precursor sediments of the study area, resulting in tourmaline-rich
metamorphic rocks and explaining petrographic features such as the high
tourmaline content. The B-isotope ratios and whole-rock B contents give
important hints about the depositional environment in the Pfitsch–Mörchner
basin, for a continental, intramontane setting with high evaporation rates.</p>
      <p id="d1e4075">Al- and P-bearing quartzites can be an important indication of a disconformity
(however, they should not be considered a proof of a dis- or
unconformity). In the Pfitsch–Mörchner basin, such rocks mark the
depositional<?pagebreak page419?> transition from a closed-basin setting to an open basin. In
their protoliths of phosphatic sandstones, P minerals are difficult to
identify, but during metamorphism and the formation of macroscopically
identifiable blue lazulite, easily found during fieldwork, the presence of
these quartzites can hint at a possible disconformity.</p>
      <p id="d1e4079">Basinal brines, enriched in B, can lead to the formation of tourmalinite,
with crosscutting field relations. Characteristic for the origin of these
tourmalinites is fluid immiscibility of B-rich and Si-rich gel-like fluids.
In the case of the Pfitsch–Mörchner basin, the heat source of this
hydrothermal event is unknown, but we speculate that it was associated with
Permo-Triassic magmatism that took place following incipient rifting after
the Variscan orogeny and before the onset of the Alpine orogeny.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4087">Data and the Supplement used in this article are available at  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5880/fidgeo.2021.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5880/fidgeo.2021.013</ext-link> (Franz et al., 2021).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sampleavailability"><title>Sample availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4096">Samples are stored at the Free University of Berlin and at the Technical University of Berlin. No IGSNs have been assigned.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4103">GF contributed to conceptualization, fieldwork, sampling, interpretation, and writing. EB contributed to fieldwork, sampling, data production, interpretation, and writing. MK contributed to fieldwork,
sampling, data production, interpretation, and writing; AM contributed to boron data
production. AL contributed to fieldwork, sampling, data production, interpretation, and
writing. DS contributed to fieldwork, sampling, data production, interpretation, and
writing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4109">Author Gerhard Franz is a member of the managing committee for this journal. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4115">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4121">We thank our students who over
several years contributed data during field courses, as well as diplomas and
bachelor's and master's theses. Discussions and support with literature by Jane Selverstone, Laura Gaggero, and Volkmar Mair  are gratefully acknowledged. Reinhard Gaupp
and John Slack carefully read an earlier version of the manuscript and helped
significantly to clarify several points. Bernard Bonin and the anonymous referee
are thanked for their helpful reviews, and Klaus Mezger and Elisabetta Rampone are thanked for editorial handling.
Gerhard Franz extends special thanks to Giulio Morteani for introducing him to this
fascinating field area and last but not least to the Volgger family from
Pfitscher Joch Haus for long-lasting hospitality and friendship.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4126">This research has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant nos. FR 557/31-1, HE 2015/16-1, and INST 144/308-1).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>This open-access publication was funded <?xmltex \notforhtml{\newline}?> by Technische Universität Berlin.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4137">This paper was edited by Elisabetta Rampone and reviewed by Bernard Bonin and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Aubert, D., Stille, P., and Probst, A.: REE fractionation during granite
weathering and removal by waters and suspended loads: Sr and Nd isotopic
evidence, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 65, 387–406, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ague, J. J.: Extreme channelization of fluid and the problem of element
mobility during Barrovian metamorphism, Am. Mineral., 96, 333–352, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bao, Z. and Zhao, Z.: Geochemistry of mineralization with exchangeable REY
in the weathering crusts of granitic rocks in South China, Ore Geol. Rev.,
33, 519–535, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Barnes, J. D., Selverstone, J., and Sharp, Z. D.: Interactions between
serpentinite devolatilization, metasomatism and strike-slip strain
localization during deep-crustal shearing in the eastern Alps, J. Metam.
Geol., 22, 283–300, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Barrientos, X. and Selverstone, J.: Metamorphosed soils as stratigraphic
indicators in deformed terranes: An example from the Eastern Alps, Geology,
15, 841–844, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bhatia, M. R.: Plate tectonics and geochemical composition of sandstones, J.
Geol., 91, 611–627, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bebout, G. E. and Graham, C. M.: Cycling of B, Li, and LILE (K, Cs, Rb, Ba,
Sr) into subduction zones: SIMS evidence from micas in high-P/T
metasedimentary rocks, Chem. Geol., 239, 284–304, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bebout, G. E. and Nakamura, E.: Record in metamorphic tourmaline of
subduction-zone devolatilization and boron cycling, Geology, 31, 407–410,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Behrmann, J. H.: Crustal-scale extension in a convergent orogen: The
Sterzing-Steinach mylonite zone in the Eastern Alps, Geodyn. Acta, 2, 63–73,
1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Behrmann, J. H. and Frisch, W.: Sinistral ductile shearing associated with
metamorphic decompression in the Tauern window, Eastern Alps, Jb. Geol.
B.-A., 133, 135–146, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Berryman, E. J., Kutzschbach, M., Trumbull, R. B., Meixner, A., van
Hinsberg, V., Kasemann, S. A., and Franz, G.: Tourmaline as a petrogenetic
indicator in the Pfitsch Formation, western Tauern Window, eastern Alps,
Lithos, 284–285, 138–155, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Brandner, R., Töchterle, A., Pomela, H., and Reiter, F.: Geological map
of the Brenner-Basistunnel 1 : 50,000, Geol. Surv. Bozen, Italy, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Brunsmann, A., Franz, G., and Erzinger, J.: REE mobilization during
small-scale high-pressure fluid-rock interaction an<?pagebreak page420?>d zoisite/fluid
partitioning of La to Eu, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 65, 559–570, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cassinis, G., Cortesogno, L., Gaggero, L., and Buzzi, L.: Permian to
Triassic geodynamic and magmatic evolution of the Brescian Prealps (eastern
Lombardy, Italy), Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. (Ital. J. Geosc.) 127, 501–518,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cesare, B., Rubatto, D. Hermann, J., and Barzi, L.: Evidence for late
Carboniferous subduction-type magmatism in mafic-ultramafic cumulates of the
SW Tauern window (eastern Alps), Contrib. Miner. Petrol., 142, 449–464,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Christa, E.: Das Gebiet des Oberen Zemmgrundes in den Zillertaler Alpen, Jb.
Geol. B.-A., 81, 533–635, 1931.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cortesogno, L., Fiorini, E., Gaggero, L., Molina, M., and Ronchi, A.: New
stratigraphic and petrographic data on the Permian Tione basin (lower Val
Rendena, Trentino, Italy), Atti Tic. Sc. Terra (Serie Spez.), 7, 125–138,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Day-Stirrat, R. J., Milliken, K. L., Dutton, S. P., Loucks, R. G., Hillier,
S., Aplin, A. C., and Schleicher, A. M.: Open-system chemical behavior in
deep Wilcox Group mudstones, Texas Gulf Coast, USA, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 27,
1804–1818, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
De Capitani, L., Moroni, M., and Rodeghiero, F.: Geological and geochemical
characteristics of Permian tourmalinization at Val Trompia (southern Alps,
northern Italy) and relationship with the Orobictourmalinites, Periodica Mineral., 68, 185–212, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
De Vecchi, G. P. and Baggio, P.: The Penninic zone of the Vizze region in
the western Tauern Window (Italian eastern Alps), Boll. Soc. Geol. Italia,
101, 89–116, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Elter, F. M., Gaggero, L., Mantovani, F., Pandeli, E., and Costamagna, L.
G.: The Atlas-east Variscan-Elbe shear system and its role in the formation
of the pull-apart late Paleozoic basins, Int. J. Earth Sci., 109, 739–760,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fedo, C. M., Nesbitt, H. W., and Young, G. M.: Unraveling the effects of
potassium metasomatism in sedimentary rocks and paleosols, with implications
for paleoweathering conditions and provenance, Geology, 23, 921–924, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Feijth, J.: Palaeozoic and Mesozoic tectono-metamorphic development and
geochronology of the Orobic chain (southern Alps, Lombardy, Italy), PhD
thesis, Technical University Berlin, 166 pp., 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Finger, F., Frasl, G., Haunschmidt, B., Lettner, H., von Quadt, A.,
Schermaier, A., Schindlmayr, A. O., and Steyrer, H. P.: The Zentralgneise of
the Tauern window (Eastern Alps): insight into an intra-alpine Vasican
batholith, in: Pre-Mesozoic geology in
the Alps, edited by: von Raumer, J. F. and Neubauer, F., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 375–391, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Foley, N. and Ayuso, R.: REE enrichment in granite-derived regolith deposits
of the Southeastern United States: Prospective source rocks and accumulation
processes, British Columbia Geol. Surv. Paper, 2015-3, 131–138, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Franz, G., Grundmann, G., and Ackermand, D.: Rock forming beryl from a
regional metamorphic terrain (Tauern Window, Austria): Parageneses and
crystal chemistry, Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt. 35, 167–192, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Franz, G., Berryman, E., Kutzschbach, M., Meixner, A., Kasemann, S.,
Lucassen, F., Loges, A., and Schultze, D.: Whole-rock geochemistry of rock
units from the Pfitscher Joch area, Western Tauern Window, GFZ Data
Services, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5880/fidgeo.2021.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5880/fidgeo.2021.013</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Frisch, W.: Tectonics of the western Tauern Window, Mitt. Österr. Geol.
Ges. 71, 65–71, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gaboreau, S., Beaufort, D., Viellard, P., Patrier, P., and Bruneton, P.:
Aluminium-phosphate-sulfate minerals associated with Proterozoic
unconformity-type uranium deposits in the east Alligator Rivers uranium
field, Northern Territory, Australia, Can. Mineral., 43, 813–827, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gaboreau, S., Cuney, M., Quirt, D., Beaufort, D., Patrier, P., and Mathieu,
R.: Significance of aluminum phosphate-sulfate minerals associated with
unconformity-type deposits: The Athabasca basin, Canada, Am. Mineral., 92,
267–280, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Galán-Abellán, A. B., Barrenechea, J. F., Benito, M. I., De la
Horra, R., Luque, F. J., Alonso-Azcárate, J., López-Gómez,
A. J., and Lago, M.: Palaeoenvironmental implications of aluminum
phosphate-sulphate minerals in Early–Middle Triassic continental sediments,
SE Iberian Range (Spain), Sed. Geol., 289, 169–181, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gleißner, P., Franz, G., and Frei, D.: Contemporaneous opening of the
Alpine Tethys in the Eastern and Western Alps: Constraints from a Late
Jurassic gabbro intrusion age in the Glockner Nappe, Tauern Window, Austria,
Int. J. Earth Sci., accepted, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Glodny, J., Ring, U., and Kühn, A.: Coeval high-pressure metamorphism,
thrusting, strike-slip, and extensional shearing in the Tauern Window,
Eastern Alps, Tectonics, 27, TC4004, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007TC002193</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Grew, E. S., Hystad, G., Hazen, R. M., Krivovichev, S. V., and Gorelova, L.
A.: How many boron minerals occur in Earth's upper crust?, Am. Mineral., 102,
1573–1587, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hall, R. B., Foord, E. E., Keller, D. J., and Keller, W. D.: Phosphates in
some Missouri refractory clays, Clays Clay Minerals, 45, 353–364, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Henry, D. J., Dutrow, B. L., and Selverstone, J.: Compositional asymmetry in
replacement tourmaline – An example from the Tauern Window, eastern Alps,
Geol. Mat. Res., 4, 1–18, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Herron, M. M.: Geochemical classification of terrigenous sands and shales
from core or log data, J. Sed. Petrol., 58, 820–829, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hikov, A.: Geochemistry of hydrothermally altered rocks from the Asarel
porphyry copper deposit, central Srednogorie, Geol. Balcanica, 42, 3–28,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Karakaya, M. Ç., Karakaya, N., Küpeli, Ş., and Yavuz, F.:
Mineralogy and geochemical behavior of trace elements of hydrothermal
alteration types in the volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits, NE Turkey,
Ore Geol. Rev., 48, 197–224, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kasemann, S., Meixner, A., Rocholl, A., Vennemann, T., Rosner, M., Schmitt,
A., and Wiedenbeck, M.: Boron and oxygen isotope composition of certified
reference materials NIST SRMs 610/612 and reference materials JB-2 and JR-2,
Geostandard Newsletter, 25, 405–416, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kasemann, S. A., Meixner, A., Erzinger, J., Viramonte, J. G., Alonso, R. N.,
and Franz, G.: Boron isotope composition of geothermal fluids and borate
minerals from salar deposits (central Andes/NW Argentina), J. S.
Am. Earth Sci., 16, 685–697, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Khashgerel, B.-E., Kavalieris, I., and Hayashi, K.-I.: Mineralogy, textures,
and whole-rock geochemistry of advanced argillic alteration: Hugo Dummett
porphyry Cu–Au deposit, Oyu Tolgoi mineral district, Mongolia, Mineral.,
Dep., 43, 913–932, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page421?><ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kravchuk, K. G. and Valyashko, V. M.: Equilibrium diagram of the system
Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O–SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, in: Methods of experimental
investigations of hydrothermal equilibria, edited by: Godovikov, A. A.,  Nauka, Novosibirsk, 105–117, 1979 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lammerer, B.: Das Authochton im Westlichen Tauernfenster, Jb. Geol. B.-A.
Wien, Austria, 129, 51–67, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lammerer, B. and Morteani, G.: Exkursion E8: Schlegeis und Pfitscher Joch,
Zillertaler Alpen, Österr. Mineral. Ges. Wien, 135, 185–197, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lammerer, B. and Weger, M.: Footwall uplift in an orogeneic wedge: The
Tauern Window in the Eastern Alps of Europe, Tectonophysics, 285, 213–230,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lammerer, B., Gebrande, H., Lüschen, E., and Veselá, P.: A
crustal-scale cross-section through the Tauern Window (eastern Alps) from
geophysical and geological data, Geol. Soc., London Spec. Pub., 298,
219–229, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lammerer, B., Selverstone, J., and Franz, G.: Field trip to the Tauern
Window region along the TRANSALP seismic profile, eastern Alps, Austria,
Geol. Soc. Amer., Field Guide 22, 1–20, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Land, L. S., Mack, L. E., Milliken, K. L., and Lynch, F. L.: Burial
diagenesis of argillaceous sediment, south Texas Gulf of Mexico sedimentary
basin: A reexamination, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 109, 2–15, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Leising, J. F., Tyler, S. W., and Miller, W. W.: Convection of saline brines
in enclosed lacustrine basins: A mechanism for potassium metasomatism, Geol.
Soc. Am. Bull., 107, 1157–1163, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Li, X.-C., Fan, H.-R., Santosh, M., Hu, F.-F., Yang, K.-F., and Lan, T.-G.:
Hydrothermal alteration associated with Mesozoic granite-hosted gold
mineralization at the Sanshandao deposit, Jiaodong gold province, China, Ore
Geol. Rev., 53, 403–421, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lottermoser, B. G.: Rare earth elements and hydrothermal ore formation
processes, Ore Geol. Rev. 7, 25–41, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Marfil, S. A., Maiza, P. J., and Montecchiari, N.: Alteration zonation in
the Loma Blanca kaolin deposit, Los Menucos, Province of Rio Negro,
Argentina, Clay Minerals, 45, 145–157, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
MacLean, W. H., and Hoy, L. D.: Geochemistry of hydrothermally altered rocks
at the Horne mine, Noranda, Quebec, Econ. Geol. 86, 506–528, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
McArthur, J. M., Howarth, R. J. and Shields, G. A.: Strontium Isotope
Stratigraphy, The Geologic Time Scale, Cambridge University Press, 127–144, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Melcher, F., Prochaska, W., Raith, J. G., and Saini-Eidukat, B.: The
metamorphosed molybdenum vein-deposit of the Alpeinerscharte, Tyrol
(Austria) and its relation to Variscan granitoids, Mineral. Deposita, 31,
277–289, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Melzer, S. and Wunder, B.: Island-arc basalt alkali rations – Constraints
from phengite-fluid partitioning experiments, Geology, 28, 583–586, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Melzer, S. and Wunder, B.: K-Rb-Cs partitioning between phlogopite and
fluid: Experiments and consequences for the LILE signatures of island arc
basalts, Lithos 59, 69–90, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Middlemost, E. A.: Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 37, 215–224, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mordberg, L. E., Stanley, C. J., and Germann, K..: Rare earth element
anomalies in crandallite group minerals from the Schugorsk bauxite deposit,
Timan, Russia. Europ. J. Min., 12, 1229–1243, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Morteani, G.: Petrology of the Tauern Window, Austrian Alps, Fortschr.
Mineral., 52, 195–220, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Morteani, G. and Ackermand, D.: Aluminium phosphates in muscovite-kyanite
metaquartzites from Passo di Vizze (Alto Adige, NE Italy), Eur. J. Mineral.,
8, 853–869, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Morteani, G., Ackermand, D., and Trappe, J.: Aluminium phosphate in
Proterozoic metaquartzites: Implications for the Precambrian oceanic P
budget and development of life, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. Spec. Pap., 423,
579–592, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mostler, H., Heissel, G., and Gasser, G.: Untersuchung von
Erzlagerstätten im Innsbrucker Quarzphyllit und auf der Alpeiner
Scharte, Arch. Lagerstättenf. Geol. BA, 1, 77–83, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nesbitt, H. W. and Young, G. M.: Prediction of some weathering trends of
plutonic and volcanic rocks based on thermodynamic and kinetic
considerations, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 48, 1523–1534, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nikishin, A. M., Ziegler, P. A., Abott, D., Brunet, M.-F., and Cloething,
S.: Permo-Triassic intraplate magmatism and rifting in Eurasia: implications
for mantle plumes and mantle dynamics, Tectonophics, 351, 3–39,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Oeser, R. A., Stroncik, N., Moskwa, L.-M., Bernhard, N., Schaller, M.,
Canessa, R., van den Brink, L., Köster, M., Brucker, E., Stock, S., Fuentes, J. P., Godoy, R., Matus, F. J., Oses Pedraza, R., Osses McIntyre, P., Paulino, L., Seguel, O., Bader, M. Y., Boy, J., Dippold, M. A., Ehlers, T.
A., Kühn, P., Kuzyakov, Y., Leinweber, P., Scholten, T., Spielvogel, S.,
Spohn, M., Übernickel, K., Tielbörger, K., Wagner, D., and von
Blanckenburg, F.: Chemistry and microbiology of the critical zone along a
steep climate and vegetation gradient in the Chilean coastal Cordillera,
Catena, 170, 183–203, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Owens, B. E. and Pasek, M. A.: Kyanite quartzites in the Piedmont province of
Virginia: Evidence for a possible high-sulfidation system, Econ. Geol., 102,
495–509, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Owens, B. E. and Hollingsworth, J. W.: Mineralogical and geochemical
constraints on the origin of kyanite quartzites in the Kings Mountain
terrain, North Carolina and South Carolina, Southeast. Geol., 53, 81–96,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Padrones, J. T., Imai, A., and Takahashi, R.: Geochemical behavior of rare
earth elements in weathered granitic rocks in northern Palawan, Philippines,
Res. Geol., 67, 321–353, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Palmer, M. R. and Swihart, G. H.: Boron isotope geochemistry: an overview,
Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 33, 709–744, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pearce, J. A., Harris, N. B. W., and Tindle, A. G.: Trace element
discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks,
J. Petrol., 25, 956–983, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pearce, J. A. and Cann, J. R.: Tectonic setting of basic volcanic rocks
determined using trace element analyses, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 19,
290–300, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pe-Piper, G. and Dolansky, L. M.: Early diagenetic origin of Al
phosphate-sulfate minerals (woodhouseite and crandallite series) in
terrestrial sandstones, Nova Scotia, Canada, Amer. Mineral., 90, 1434–1441,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pourmand, A. N., Dauphas, N., and Ireland, T. J.: A novel extraction
chromatography and MC-IC-MS technique for rapid analysis of REE, Sc and Y:
Revising CI-chondrite and Post-Archean Australian Shale (PAAS), Chem. Geol.,
291, 38–54, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rasmussen, B: Early-diagenetic REE-phosphate minerals (florencite,
crandallite, gorceixite and xenotime) in marine sandstones: A major sink for
oceanic phosphorus, Am. J. Sci., 296, 601–632, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page422?><ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ratschbacher, L., Merle, O., Davy, P., and Cobbold, P.: Lateral extrusion in
the eastern Alps, Part 1: Boundary conditions and experiments scaled for
gravity, Tectonics, 10, 245–256, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ricchi, E., Bergemann, C. A., Gnos, E., Berger, A., Rubatto, D., Whitehouse, M. J., and Walter, F.: Cenozoic deformation in the Tauern Window (Eastern Alps) constrained by in situ Th-Pb dating of fissure monazite, Solid Earth, 11, 437–467, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-437-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/se-11-437-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Romer, R. L., Meixner, A., and Hahne, K.: Lithium and boron isotopic composition
of sedimentary rocks – the role of source history and depositional
environment: a 250 Ma record from the Cadomian orogeny to the Variscan
orogeny, Gondwana Res., 26, 1093–1110, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rosenberg, C. L. and Schneider, S.: The western termination of the SEMP
Fault (eastern Alps) and its bearing on the exhumation of the Tauern Window,
Geol. Soc., London, Spec. Publ., 298, 197–218, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rosenberg, C. L., Schneider, S., Scharf, A., Bertrand, A., Hammerschmidt,
K., Rabaute, A., and Brun, J. P.: Relating collisional kinematics to
exhumation processes in the Eastern Alps, Earth Sci. Rev., 176, 311–344,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rudnick, R. L. and Gao, S.: Composition of the continental crust,
Treatise on Geochemistry, Elsevier Ltd. 3, 1–64, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schaltegger, U., Desmurs, L., Manatschal, G., Müntener, O., Meier, M.,
Frank, M., and Bernoulli, D.: The transition from rifting to sea-floor
spreading within a magma-poor rifted margin: Field and isotopic constraints,
Terra Nova, 14, 156–162, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schmid, S. M., Scharf, A., Handy, M. R., and Rosenberg, C. L.: The Tauern
Window (eastern Alps, Austria): A new tectonic map with cross-sections and a
tectonic metamorphic synthesis, Swiss J. Geosci., 106, 1–32, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schön, C. and Lammerer, B.: Die postvariskischen Metakonglomerate des
westlichen Tauernfensters, Österreich, Mitt. österr. geol. Ges., 81,
219–232, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schorn, A., Neubauer, F., Genser, J., and Bernroider, M.: The Haselgebirge
evaporitic melange in central northern calcareous Alps (Austria): Part of
the Permian to Lower Triassic rift of the Meliata ocean?, Tectonophysics,
583, 28–48, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schmid, S. M., Scharf, A., Handy, M. R., and Rosenberg, C. L.: The Tauern
Window (Eastern Alps, Austria): a new tectonic map with cross-sections and a
tectonometamorphic synthesis, Swiss J. Geosci., 106, 1–32, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schulz, B.: Alpidische Metamorphose im westlichen Tauernfenster (Ostalpen):
Interpretation mit P-T-Pfaden von Amphiboliten, Zbl. Geol. Paläont. Teil
I, H. 3/4, 315–328, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schulz, B., Triboulet, C., and Adren, A.: Microstructures and mineral
chemistry in amphibolites from the western Tauern Window (eastern Alps), and
P-T deformation paths of the Alpine greenschist-amphibolite facies
metamorphism, Mineral. Mag., 59, 641–659, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schuster, R. and Stüwe, K.: Permian metamorphic event in the Alps,
Geology, 36, 603–606, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Scotese, C. R., and Schettino, A.: Late Permian-Early Jurassic
paleogeography of western Tethys and the world, in: Permo-Triassic Salt
Provinces of Europe, North Africa and the Atlantic Margins,
Elsevier, 57–95, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J.: Petrologic constraints on imbrication, metamorphism, and
uplift in the SW Tauern Window, eastern Alps, Tectonics, 4, 607–704, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J.: Evidence for east-west crustal extension in the eastern
Alps: Implications for the unroofing history of the Tauern Window,
Tectonics, 7, 87–105, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J.: Micro- to macroscale interactions between deformational and
metamorphic processes, Tauern Window, eastern Alps, Schweiz. Mineral.
Petrogr. Mitt., 73, 229–239, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J. and Hyatt, J.: Chemical and physical responses to
deformation in micaceous quartzites from the Tauern Window, eastern Alps, J.
Metam. Geol., 21, 335–345, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J. and Muñoz, J. L.: Fluid heterogeneities and hornblende
stability in interlayered graphitic and nongraphitic schists (Tauern Window,
eastern Alps), Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 96, 426–440, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J. and Spear, F. S.: Metamorphic P-T paths from pelitic schists
and greenstones from the south-west Tauern Window, eastern Alps, J. Metam.
Geol., 3, 439–465, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J., Spear, F. S., Franz, G., and Morteani, G.: High-pressure
metamorphism in the SW Tauern Window, Austria: P-T paths from
hornblende-kyanite-staurolite-schists, J. Petrol., 25, 501–531, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J., Morteani, G., and Staude, J. M.: Fluid channeling during
ductile shearing: Transformation of granodiorite into aluminous schist in
the Tauern Window, eastern Alps, J. Metam. Geol., 9, 419–431, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Skelton, A. D. L., Graham, C. M., and Bickle, M. J.: Lithological and
structural controls on regional 3-D fluid flow patterns during greenschist
facies metamorphism of the Dalradian of the SW Scottish Highlands, J. Petrol., 36, 563–586, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Slack, J. F., Passchier, C. W., and Zhang, J. S.: Metasomatic tourmalinite
formation along basement-cover décollements, Orobic Alps, Italy,
Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt., 76, 193–207, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Smith, G. I., Medrano, M. D., and Anovitz, L. M.: Boron: Mineralogy,
petrology and geochemistry, Rev. Mineralogy, 33, 263–298,1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smirnov, S. Z., Thomas, V. G., Demin, S. P., and Drebushchak, V. A.:
Experimental study of boron solubility and speciation in the
Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O–B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O system, Chem. Geol., 223, 16–34, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Steffen, K., Selverstone, J., and Brearley, A.: Episodic weakening and
strengthening during synmetamorphic deformation in a deep-crustal shear zone
in the Alps, in: The Nature and Tectonic Significance of Fault Zone
Weakening, edited by: Holdsworth, R. E., Strachan, R. A., Magloughlin, J. F., and Knipe, R. J., Geological Society, London, 141–156, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Steffen, K. and Selverstone, J.: Retrieval of P-T information from shear
zones: Thermobarometric consequences of changes in plagioclase deformation
mechanisms, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 151, 600–614, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tauson, V. L., Taroev, V. K., Akimov, V. V., Gottlicher, J., Pentinghaus,
H., and Rocholl, A.: New data on Cs and Rb distribution between potassium
feldspar and alkaline fluid: A study of the trapping effect, Geochem. Int.,
39, 725–734, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Thyne, G.: A model for diagenetic mass transfer between adjacent sandstone
and shale, Marine Petrol. Geol., 18, 743–755, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tonarini, S., Pennisi, M., and Leeman, W. P.: Precise boron isotopic analysis of complex silicate (rock) samples using alkali carbonate fusion and
ion-exchange separation, Chem. Geol., 142, 129–137, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page423?><ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Trumbull, R. B., Krienitz, M.-S., Grundmann, G., and Wiedenbeck M.:
Tourmaline geochemistry and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>B variations as a guide to
fluid–rock interaction in the Habachtal emerald deposit, Tauern Window,
Austria, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 157, 411–427, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Turekian, K. K. and Wedepohl, K. H.: Distribution of the elements in some
major units of the Earth's crust, Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 72, 175–192, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Valyashko, V. M.: Phase equilibria and properties of hydrothermal systems,
Nauka, Moscow, 270 pp., 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Veselá, P. and Lammerer, B.: The Pfitsch-Mörchner basin, an example
of the post-Variscan sedimentary evolution in the Tauern Window (eastern
Alps), Swiss J. Geosci., 101, 73–88, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Veselá, P., Söllner, F., Finger, F., and Gerdes, A.:
Magmato-sedimentary Carboniferous to Jurassic evolution of the western
Tauern window, eastern Alps (constraints from U-Pb zircon dating and
geochemistry), Int. J. Earth Sci., 100, 993–1027, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>von Goerne, G., Franz, G., and Heinrich, W.: Synthesis of tourmaline
solid solutions in the system
Na<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O–MgO–Al<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O–HCl
and the distribution of Na between tourmaline and fluid at 300 to
700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 200 MPa, Contrib. Mineral. Petr.,
141, 160–173, 2001. 
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Williams, L. B., Hervig, R. L., Holloway, J. R., and Hutcheon, I.: Boron
isotope geochemistry during diagenesis, Part 1. Experimental determination
of fractionation during illitization of smectite, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta,
65, 1769–1782, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Williams, J. C., Stebbins, A., and Brookfield, M. E.: Geochemical changes
across a marginal marine Permo-Triassic boundary section on the Adria
carbonate platform at Brsnina, Slovenia, Int. J. Earth
Sci., 110, 923–942, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wunder, B., Meixner, A., Romer, R. L., Wirth, R., and Heinrich, W.: The
geochemical cycle of boron: Constraints from boron isotope partitioning
experiments between mica and fluid, Lithos 84, 206–216, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yuan, S., Neubauer, F., Liu, Y., Genser, J., Liu, B., Yu, S., Chang, R., and
Guan, Q.: Widespread Permian granite magmatism in Lower Austroalpine units:
significance for Permian rifting in the Eastern Alps, Swiss J.
Geosci., 113, 18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s00015-020-00371-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s00015-020-00371-5</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Geochemistry and paleogeographic implications of Permo-Triassic metasedimentary cover from the Tauern Window (Eastern Alps)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The chemical composition of metasediments is a valuable
source of paleogeographic information about the protolith's sedimentary
environment. Here, we compile major- and trace-element whole-rock data,
including B contents, and <sup>10∕11</sup>B-isotope ratios from the Permo-Triassic
metasedimentary cover of the Pfitsch–Mörchner basin, overlying the
Variscan basement in the western Tauern Window, Eastern Alps
(Austria and Italy). The basement consists of orthogneiss (<q>Zentralgneis</q>,
metamorphosed Variscan granitoids with intrusion ages between 305 and 280&thinsp;Ma), and the roof pendant consists of granites (amphibolites, paragneiss, and
minor serpentinites). The Zentralgneis is partly hydrothermally altered into
pyrite quartzite with high Al–S contents, low Na–Sr–Ca–Mg contents, and very strong
depletion of the light rare earth elements. Comparison with published
detailed mapping of this and other time-equivalent basins in the western
Tauern Window, with radiometric age data in the literature, and with
unmetamorphosed basins in the South Alpine realm yields a late Permian to
Early Triassic age of sedimentation.</p><p>Although during Alpine metamorphism all rocks were strongly deformed, the
whole-rock chemical compositions of the metasediments were not pervasively
changed during deformation. We show that the sediments were deposited in a
small, probably lacustrine–fluviatile, intramontane basin, under arid to
semi-arid climatic conditions. The sequence starts with metaconglomerates,
which can be interpreted as a mixture of the different basement rocks, based
on a combination of major-element ratios Na<sub>2</sub>O&thinsp;∕&thinsp;(Na<sub>2</sub>O&thinsp;+&thinsp;K<sub>2</sub>O)
and MgO&thinsp;∕&thinsp;(MgO&thinsp;+&thinsp;Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) with concentrations of trace elements Cr, V,
and Ni. The sequence is overlain by a fining-upwards sequence of clastic
sediments, in which the behavior of K, Rb, and Sr allows the reconstruction
of intense diagenetic K–B metasomatism, which raised the K<sub>2</sub>O contents
up to  ∼ &thinsp;10&thinsp;wt&thinsp;%. The average B content of 218&thinsp;µg&thinsp;g<sup>−1</sup> is
well above the B content of common sediments, and the B-isotope composition
reaches extremely low values of down to −33&thinsp;‰&thinsp;<i>δ</i><sup>11</sup>B. The top of the sequence is a lazulite quartzite, interpreted as a
former conglomeratic phosphatic sandstone, which marks the transition from a
closed Permian basin to an open Triassic basin. Within the clastic sequence,
the presence of hydrothermal tourmalinite veins documents a hydrothermal
event after deposition but before the onset of Alpine metamorphism. A
metamorphosed mafic dike swarm in the orthogneiss indicates a post-Variscan
event of basaltic magmatism, and this event is tentatively correlated with
increased heat flow in the Triassic basin and hydrothermal activity. A
consistent conceptual model of this basin and its diagenetic modifications,
based on a combination of geochemical data with petrographical and field
information, provides the geodynamic context of the European margin at the
onset of the Alpine orogeny.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aubert, D., Stille, P., and Probst, A.: REE fractionation during granite
weathering and removal by waters and suspended loads: Sr and Nd isotopic
evidence, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 65, 387–406, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ague, J. J.: Extreme channelization of fluid and the problem of element
mobility during Barrovian metamorphism, Am. Mineral., 96, 333–352, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bao, Z. and Zhao, Z.: Geochemistry of mineralization with exchangeable REY
in the weathering crusts of granitic rocks in South China, Ore Geol. Rev.,
33, 519–535, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Barnes, J. D., Selverstone, J., and Sharp, Z. D.: Interactions between
serpentinite devolatilization, metasomatism and strike-slip strain
localization during deep-crustal shearing in the eastern Alps, J. Metam.
Geol., 22, 283–300, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Barrientos, X. and Selverstone, J.: Metamorphosed soils as stratigraphic
indicators in deformed terranes: An example from the Eastern Alps, Geology,
15, 841–844, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bhatia, M. R.: Plate tectonics and geochemical composition of sandstones, J.
Geol., 91, 611–627, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bebout, G. E. and Graham, C. M.: Cycling of B, Li, and LILE (K, Cs, Rb, Ba,
Sr) into subduction zones: SIMS evidence from micas in high-P/T
metasedimentary rocks, Chem. Geol., 239, 284–304, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bebout, G. E. and Nakamura, E.: Record in metamorphic tourmaline of
subduction-zone devolatilization and boron cycling, Geology, 31, 407–410,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Behrmann, J. H.: Crustal-scale extension in a convergent orogen: The
Sterzing-Steinach mylonite zone in the Eastern Alps, Geodyn. Acta, 2, 63–73,
1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Behrmann, J. H. and Frisch, W.: Sinistral ductile shearing associated with
metamorphic decompression in the Tauern window, Eastern Alps, Jb. Geol.
B.-A., 133, 135–146, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Berryman, E. J., Kutzschbach, M., Trumbull, R. B., Meixner, A., van
Hinsberg, V., Kasemann, S. A., and Franz, G.: Tourmaline as a petrogenetic
indicator in the Pfitsch Formation, western Tauern Window, eastern Alps,
Lithos, 284–285, 138–155, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Brandner, R., Töchterle, A., Pomela, H., and Reiter, F.: Geological map
of the Brenner-Basistunnel 1&thinsp;:&thinsp;50,000, Geol. Surv. Bozen, Italy, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Brunsmann, A., Franz, G., and Erzinger, J.: REE mobilization during
small-scale high-pressure fluid-rock interaction and zoisite/fluid
partitioning of La to Eu, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 65, 559–570, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Cassinis, G., Cortesogno, L., Gaggero, L., and Buzzi, L.: Permian to
Triassic geodynamic and magmatic evolution of the Brescian Prealps (eastern
Lombardy, Italy), Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. (Ital. J. Geosc.) 127, 501–518,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cesare, B., Rubatto, D. Hermann, J., and Barzi, L.: Evidence for late
Carboniferous subduction-type magmatism in mafic-ultramafic cumulates of the
SW Tauern window (eastern Alps), Contrib. Miner. Petrol., 142, 449–464,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Christa, E.: Das Gebiet des Oberen Zemmgrundes in den Zillertaler Alpen, Jb.
Geol. B.-A., 81, 533–635, 1931.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cortesogno, L., Fiorini, E., Gaggero, L., Molina, M., and Ronchi, A.: New
stratigraphic and petrographic data on the Permian Tione basin (lower Val
Rendena, Trentino, Italy), Atti Tic. Sc. Terra (Serie Spez.), 7, 125–138,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Day-Stirrat, R. J., Milliken, K. L., Dutton, S. P., Loucks, R. G., Hillier,
S., Aplin, A. C., and Schleicher, A. M.: Open-system chemical behavior in
deep Wilcox Group mudstones, Texas Gulf Coast, USA, Mar. Petrol. Geol., 27,
1804–1818, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
De Capitani, L., Moroni, M., and Rodeghiero, F.: Geological and geochemical
characteristics of Permian tourmalinization at Val Trompia (southern Alps,
northern Italy) and relationship with the Orobictourmalinites, Periodica Mineral., 68, 185–212, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
De Vecchi, G. P. and Baggio, P.: The Penninic zone of the Vizze region in
the western Tauern Window (Italian eastern Alps), Boll. Soc. Geol. Italia,
101, 89–116, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Elter, F. M., Gaggero, L., Mantovani, F., Pandeli, E., and Costamagna, L.
G.: The Atlas-east Variscan-Elbe shear system and its role in the formation
of the pull-apart late Paleozoic basins, Int. J. Earth Sci., 109, 739–760,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Fedo, C. M., Nesbitt, H. W., and Young, G. M.: Unraveling the effects of
potassium metasomatism in sedimentary rocks and paleosols, with implications
for paleoweathering conditions and provenance, Geology, 23, 921–924, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Feijth, J.: Palaeozoic and Mesozoic tectono-metamorphic development and
geochronology of the Orobic chain (southern Alps, Lombardy, Italy), PhD
thesis, Technical University Berlin, 166 pp., 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Finger, F., Frasl, G., Haunschmidt, B., Lettner, H., von Quadt, A.,
Schermaier, A., Schindlmayr, A. O., and Steyrer, H. P.: The Zentralgneise of
the Tauern window (Eastern Alps): insight into an intra-alpine Vasican
batholith, in: Pre-Mesozoic geology in
the Alps, edited by: von Raumer, J. F. and Neubauer, F., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 375–391, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Foley, N. and Ayuso, R.: REE enrichment in granite-derived regolith deposits
of the Southeastern United States: Prospective source rocks and accumulation
processes, British Columbia Geol. Surv. Paper, 2015-3, 131–138, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Franz, G., Grundmann, G., and Ackermand, D.: Rock forming beryl from a
regional metamorphic terrain (Tauern Window, Austria): Parageneses and
crystal chemistry, Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt. 35, 167–192, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Franz, G., Berryman, E., Kutzschbach, M., Meixner, A., Kasemann, S.,
Lucassen, F., Loges, A., and Schultze, D.: Whole-rock geochemistry of rock
units from the Pfitscher Joch area, Western Tauern Window, GFZ Data
Services, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5880/fidgeo.2021.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5880/fidgeo.2021.013</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Frisch, W.: Tectonics of the western Tauern Window, Mitt. Österr. Geol.
Ges. 71, 65–71, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Gaboreau, S., Beaufort, D., Viellard, P., Patrier, P., and Bruneton, P.:
Aluminium-phosphate-sulfate minerals associated with Proterozoic
unconformity-type uranium deposits in the east Alligator Rivers uranium
field, Northern Territory, Australia, Can. Mineral., 43, 813–827, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Gaboreau, S., Cuney, M., Quirt, D., Beaufort, D., Patrier, P., and Mathieu,
R.: Significance of aluminum phosphate-sulfate minerals associated with
unconformity-type deposits: The Athabasca basin, Canada, Am. Mineral., 92,
267–280, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Galán-Abellán, A. B., Barrenechea, J. F., Benito, M. I., De la
Horra, R., Luque, F. J., Alonso-Azcárate, J., López-Gómez,
A. J., and Lago, M.: Palaeoenvironmental implications of aluminum
phosphate-sulphate minerals in Early–Middle Triassic continental sediments,
SE Iberian Range (Spain), Sed. Geol., 289, 169–181, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Gleißner, P., Franz, G., and Frei, D.: Contemporaneous opening of the
Alpine Tethys in the Eastern and Western Alps: Constraints from a Late
Jurassic gabbro intrusion age in the Glockner Nappe, Tauern Window, Austria,
Int. J. Earth Sci., accepted, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Glodny, J., Ring, U., and Kühn, A.: Coeval high-pressure metamorphism,
thrusting, strike-slip, and extensional shearing in the Tauern Window,
Eastern Alps, Tectonics, 27, TC4004, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002193" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007TC002193</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Grew, E. S., Hystad, G., Hazen, R. M., Krivovichev, S. V., and Gorelova, L.
A.: How many boron minerals occur in Earth's upper crust?, Am. Mineral., 102,
1573–1587, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, R. B., Foord, E. E., Keller, D. J., and Keller, W. D.: Phosphates in
some Missouri refractory clays, Clays Clay Minerals, 45, 353–364, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Henry, D. J., Dutrow, B. L., and Selverstone, J.: Compositional asymmetry in
replacement tourmaline – An example from the Tauern Window, eastern Alps,
Geol. Mat. Res., 4, 1–18, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Herron, M. M.: Geochemical classification of terrigenous sands and shales
from core or log data, J. Sed. Petrol., 58, 820–829, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Hikov, A.: Geochemistry of hydrothermally altered rocks from the Asarel
porphyry copper deposit, central Srednogorie, Geol. Balcanica, 42, 3–28,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Karakaya, M. Ç., Karakaya, N., Küpeli, Ş., and Yavuz, F.:
Mineralogy and geochemical behavior of trace elements of hydrothermal
alteration types in the volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits, NE Turkey,
Ore Geol. Rev., 48, 197–224, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kasemann, S., Meixner, A., Rocholl, A., Vennemann, T., Rosner, M., Schmitt,
A., and Wiedenbeck, M.: Boron and oxygen isotope composition of certified
reference materials NIST SRMs 610/612 and reference materials JB-2 and JR-2,
Geostandard Newsletter, 25, 405–416, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kasemann, S. A., Meixner, A., Erzinger, J., Viramonte, J. G., Alonso, R. N.,
and Franz, G.: Boron isotope composition of geothermal fluids and borate
minerals from salar deposits (central Andes/NW Argentina), J. S.
Am. Earth Sci., 16, 685–697, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Khashgerel, B.-E., Kavalieris, I., and Hayashi, K.-I.: Mineralogy, textures,
and whole-rock geochemistry of advanced argillic alteration: Hugo Dummett
porphyry Cu–Au deposit, Oyu Tolgoi mineral district, Mongolia, Mineral.,
Dep., 43, 913–932, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kravchuk, K. G. and Valyashko, V. M.: Equilibrium diagram of the system
Na<sub>2</sub>O–SiO<sub>2</sub>–H<sub>2</sub>O, in: Methods of experimental
investigations of hydrothermal equilibria, edited by: Godovikov, A. A.,  Nauka, Novosibirsk, 105–117, 1979 (in Russian).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Lammerer, B.: Das Authochton im Westlichen Tauernfenster, Jb. Geol. B.-A.
Wien, Austria, 129, 51–67, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Lammerer, B. and Morteani, G.: Exkursion E8: Schlegeis und Pfitscher Joch,
Zillertaler Alpen, Österr. Mineral. Ges. Wien, 135, 185–197, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Lammerer, B. and Weger, M.: Footwall uplift in an orogeneic wedge: The
Tauern Window in the Eastern Alps of Europe, Tectonophysics, 285, 213–230,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Lammerer, B., Gebrande, H., Lüschen, E., and Veselá, P.: A
crustal-scale cross-section through the Tauern Window (eastern Alps) from
geophysical and geological data, Geol. Soc., London Spec. Pub., 298,
219–229, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Lammerer, B., Selverstone, J., and Franz, G.: Field trip to the Tauern
Window region along the TRANSALP seismic profile, eastern Alps, Austria,
Geol. Soc. Amer., Field Guide 22, 1–20, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Land, L. S., Mack, L. E., Milliken, K. L., and Lynch, F. L.: Burial
diagenesis of argillaceous sediment, south Texas Gulf of Mexico sedimentary
basin: A reexamination, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 109, 2–15, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Leising, J. F., Tyler, S. W., and Miller, W. W.: Convection of saline brines
in enclosed lacustrine basins: A mechanism for potassium metasomatism, Geol.
Soc. Am. Bull., 107, 1157–1163, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X.-C., Fan, H.-R., Santosh, M., Hu, F.-F., Yang, K.-F., and Lan, T.-G.:
Hydrothermal alteration associated with Mesozoic granite-hosted gold
mineralization at the Sanshandao deposit, Jiaodong gold province, China, Ore
Geol. Rev., 53, 403–421, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Lottermoser, B. G.: Rare earth elements and hydrothermal ore formation
processes, Ore Geol. Rev. 7, 25–41, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Marfil, S. A., Maiza, P. J., and Montecchiari, N.: Alteration zonation in
the Loma Blanca kaolin deposit, Los Menucos, Province of Rio Negro,
Argentina, Clay Minerals, 45, 145–157, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
MacLean, W. H., and Hoy, L. D.: Geochemistry of hydrothermally altered rocks
at the Horne mine, Noranda, Quebec, Econ. Geol. 86, 506–528, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
McArthur, J. M., Howarth, R. J. and Shields, G. A.: Strontium Isotope
Stratigraphy, The Geologic Time Scale, Cambridge University Press, 127–144, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Melcher, F., Prochaska, W., Raith, J. G., and Saini-Eidukat, B.: The
metamorphosed molybdenum vein-deposit of the Alpeinerscharte, Tyrol
(Austria) and its relation to Variscan granitoids, Mineral. Deposita, 31,
277–289, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Melzer, S. and Wunder, B.: Island-arc basalt alkali rations – Constraints
from phengite-fluid partitioning experiments, Geology, 28, 583–586, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Melzer, S. and Wunder, B.: K-Rb-Cs partitioning between phlogopite and
fluid: Experiments and consequences for the LILE signatures of island arc
basalts, Lithos 59, 69–90, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Middlemost, E. A.: Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 37, 215–224, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Mordberg, L. E., Stanley, C. J., and Germann, K..: Rare earth element
anomalies in crandallite group minerals from the Schugorsk bauxite deposit,
Timan, Russia. Europ. J. Min., 12, 1229–1243, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Morteani, G.: Petrology of the Tauern Window, Austrian Alps, Fortschr.
Mineral., 52, 195–220, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Morteani, G. and Ackermand, D.: Aluminium phosphates in muscovite-kyanite
metaquartzites from Passo di Vizze (Alto Adige, NE Italy), Eur. J. Mineral.,
8, 853–869, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Morteani, G., Ackermand, D., and Trappe, J.: Aluminium phosphate in
Proterozoic metaquartzites: Implications for the Precambrian oceanic P
budget and development of life, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. Spec. Pap., 423,
579–592, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Mostler, H., Heissel, G., and Gasser, G.: Untersuchung von
Erzlagerstätten im Innsbrucker Quarzphyllit und auf der Alpeiner
Scharte, Arch. Lagerstättenf. Geol. BA, 1, 77–83, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Nesbitt, H. W. and Young, G. M.: Prediction of some weathering trends of
plutonic and volcanic rocks based on thermodynamic and kinetic
considerations, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 48, 1523–1534, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Nikishin, A. M., Ziegler, P. A., Abott, D., Brunet, M.-F., and Cloething,
S.: Permo-Triassic intraplate magmatism and rifting in Eurasia: implications
for mantle plumes and mantle dynamics, Tectonophics, 351, 3–39,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Oeser, R. A., Stroncik, N., Moskwa, L.-M., Bernhard, N., Schaller, M.,
Canessa, R., van den Brink, L., Köster, M., Brucker, E., Stock, S., Fuentes, J. P., Godoy, R., Matus, F. J., Oses Pedraza, R., Osses McIntyre, P., Paulino, L., Seguel, O., Bader, M. Y., Boy, J., Dippold, M. A., Ehlers, T.
A., Kühn, P., Kuzyakov, Y., Leinweber, P., Scholten, T., Spielvogel, S.,
Spohn, M., Übernickel, K., Tielbörger, K., Wagner, D., and von
Blanckenburg, F.: Chemistry and microbiology of the critical zone along a
steep climate and vegetation gradient in the Chilean coastal Cordillera,
Catena, 170, 183–203, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Owens, B. E. and Pasek, M. A.: Kyanite quartzites in the Piedmont province of
Virginia: Evidence for a possible high-sulfidation system, Econ. Geol., 102,
495–509, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Owens, B. E. and Hollingsworth, J. W.: Mineralogical and geochemical
constraints on the origin of kyanite quartzites in the Kings Mountain
terrain, North Carolina and South Carolina, Southeast. Geol., 53, 81–96,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Padrones, J. T., Imai, A., and Takahashi, R.: Geochemical behavior of rare
earth elements in weathered granitic rocks in northern Palawan, Philippines,
Res. Geol., 67, 321–353, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Palmer, M. R. and Swihart, G. H.: Boron isotope geochemistry: an overview,
Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 33, 709–744, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Pearce, J. A., Harris, N. B. W., and Tindle, A. G.: Trace element
discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks,
J. Petrol., 25, 956–983, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Pearce, J. A. and Cann, J. R.: Tectonic setting of basic volcanic rocks
determined using trace element analyses, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 19,
290–300, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Pe-Piper, G. and Dolansky, L. M.: Early diagenetic origin of Al
phosphate-sulfate minerals (woodhouseite and crandallite series) in
terrestrial sandstones, Nova Scotia, Canada, Amer. Mineral., 90, 1434–1441,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Pourmand, A. N., Dauphas, N., and Ireland, T. J.: A novel extraction
chromatography and MC-IC-MS technique for rapid analysis of REE, Sc and Y:
Revising CI-chondrite and Post-Archean Australian Shale (PAAS), Chem. Geol.,
291, 38–54, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Rasmussen, B: Early-diagenetic REE-phosphate minerals (florencite,
crandallite, gorceixite and xenotime) in marine sandstones: A major sink for
oceanic phosphorus, Am. J. Sci., 296, 601–632, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Ratschbacher, L., Merle, O., Davy, P., and Cobbold, P.: Lateral extrusion in
the eastern Alps, Part 1: Boundary conditions and experiments scaled for
gravity, Tectonics, 10, 245–256, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Ricchi, E., Bergemann, C. A., Gnos, E., Berger, A., Rubatto, D., Whitehouse, M. J., and Walter, F.: Cenozoic deformation in the Tauern Window (Eastern Alps) constrained by in situ Th-Pb dating of fissure monazite, Solid Earth, 11, 437–467, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-437-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-437-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Romer, R. L., Meixner, A., and Hahne, K.: Lithium and boron isotopic composition
of sedimentary rocks – the role of source history and depositional
environment: a 250&thinsp;Ma record from the Cadomian orogeny to the Variscan
orogeny, Gondwana Res., 26, 1093–1110, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenberg, C. L. and Schneider, S.: The western termination of the SEMP
Fault (eastern Alps) and its bearing on the exhumation of the Tauern Window,
Geol. Soc., London, Spec. Publ., 298, 197–218, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenberg, C. L., Schneider, S., Scharf, A., Bertrand, A., Hammerschmidt,
K., Rabaute, A., and Brun, J. P.: Relating collisional kinematics to
exhumation processes in the Eastern Alps, Earth Sci. Rev., 176, 311–344,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Rudnick, R. L. and Gao, S.: Composition of the continental crust,
Treatise on Geochemistry, Elsevier Ltd. 3, 1–64, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Schaltegger, U., Desmurs, L., Manatschal, G., Müntener, O., Meier, M.,
Frank, M., and Bernoulli, D.: The transition from rifting to sea-floor
spreading within a magma-poor rifted margin: Field and isotopic constraints,
Terra Nova, 14, 156–162, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Schmid, S. M., Scharf, A., Handy, M. R., and Rosenberg, C. L.: The Tauern
Window (eastern Alps, Austria): A new tectonic map with cross-sections and a
tectonic metamorphic synthesis, Swiss J. Geosci., 106, 1–32, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Schön, C. and Lammerer, B.: Die postvariskischen Metakonglomerate des
westlichen Tauernfensters, Österreich, Mitt. österr. geol. Ges., 81,
219–232, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Schorn, A., Neubauer, F., Genser, J., and Bernroider, M.: The Haselgebirge
evaporitic melange in central northern calcareous Alps (Austria): Part of
the Permian to Lower Triassic rift of the Meliata ocean?, Tectonophysics,
583, 28–48, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Schmid, S. M., Scharf, A., Handy, M. R., and Rosenberg, C. L.: The Tauern
Window (Eastern Alps, Austria): a new tectonic map with cross-sections and a
tectonometamorphic synthesis, Swiss J. Geosci., 106, 1–32, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Schulz, B.: Alpidische Metamorphose im westlichen Tauernfenster (Ostalpen):
Interpretation mit P-T-Pfaden von Amphiboliten, Zbl. Geol. Paläont. Teil
I, H. 3/4, 315–328, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Schulz, B., Triboulet, C., and Adren, A.: Microstructures and mineral
chemistry in amphibolites from the western Tauern Window (eastern Alps), and
P-T deformation paths of the Alpine greenschist-amphibolite facies
metamorphism, Mineral. Mag., 59, 641–659, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Schuster, R. and Stüwe, K.: Permian metamorphic event in the Alps,
Geology, 36, 603–606, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Scotese, C. R., and Schettino, A.: Late Permian-Early Jurassic
paleogeography of western Tethys and the world, in: Permo-Triassic Salt
Provinces of Europe, North Africa and the Atlantic Margins,
Elsevier, 57–95, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J.: Petrologic constraints on imbrication, metamorphism, and
uplift in the SW Tauern Window, eastern Alps, Tectonics, 4, 607–704, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J.: Evidence for east-west crustal extension in the eastern
Alps: Implications for the unroofing history of the Tauern Window,
Tectonics, 7, 87–105, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J.: Micro- to macroscale interactions between deformational and
metamorphic processes, Tauern Window, eastern Alps, Schweiz. Mineral.
Petrogr. Mitt., 73, 229–239, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J. and Hyatt, J.: Chemical and physical responses to
deformation in micaceous quartzites from the Tauern Window, eastern Alps, J.
Metam. Geol., 21, 335–345, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J. and Muñoz, J. L.: Fluid heterogeneities and hornblende
stability in interlayered graphitic and nongraphitic schists (Tauern Window,
eastern Alps), Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 96, 426–440, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J. and Spear, F. S.: Metamorphic P-T paths from pelitic schists
and greenstones from the south-west Tauern Window, eastern Alps, J. Metam.
Geol., 3, 439–465, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J., Spear, F. S., Franz, G., and Morteani, G.: High-pressure
metamorphism in the SW Tauern Window, Austria: P-T paths from
hornblende-kyanite-staurolite-schists, J. Petrol., 25, 501–531, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Selverstone, J., Morteani, G., and Staude, J. M.: Fluid channeling during
ductile shearing: Transformation of granodiorite into aluminous schist in
the Tauern Window, eastern Alps, J. Metam. Geol., 9, 419–431, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Skelton, A. D. L., Graham, C. M., and Bickle, M. J.: Lithological and
structural controls on regional 3-D fluid flow patterns during greenschist
facies metamorphism of the Dalradian of the SW Scottish Highlands, J. Petrol., 36, 563–586, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Slack, J. F., Passchier, C. W., and Zhang, J. S.: Metasomatic tourmalinite
formation along basement-cover décollements, Orobic Alps, Italy,
Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt., 76, 193–207, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, G. I., Medrano, M. D., and Anovitz, L. M.: Boron: Mineralogy,
petrology and geochemistry, Rev. Mineralogy, 33, 263–298,1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Smirnov, S. Z., Thomas, V. G., Demin, S. P., and Drebushchak, V. A.:
Experimental study of boron solubility and speciation in the
Na<sub>2</sub>O–B<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–SiO<sub>2</sub>–H<sub>2</sub>O system, Chem. Geol., 223, 16–34, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Steffen, K., Selverstone, J., and Brearley, A.: Episodic weakening and
strengthening during synmetamorphic deformation in a deep-crustal shear zone
in the Alps, in: The Nature and Tectonic Significance of Fault Zone
Weakening, edited by: Holdsworth, R. E., Strachan, R. A., Magloughlin, J. F., and Knipe, R. J., Geological Society, London, 141–156, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Steffen, K. and Selverstone, J.: Retrieval of P-T information from shear
zones: Thermobarometric consequences of changes in plagioclase deformation
mechanisms, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 151, 600–614, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Tauson, V. L., Taroev, V. K., Akimov, V. V., Gottlicher, J., Pentinghaus,
H., and Rocholl, A.: New data on Cs and Rb distribution between potassium
feldspar and alkaline fluid: A study of the trapping effect, Geochem. Int.,
39, 725–734, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Thyne, G.: A model for diagenetic mass transfer between adjacent sandstone
and shale, Marine Petrol. Geol., 18, 743–755, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Tonarini, S., Pennisi, M., and Leeman, W. P.: Precise boron isotopic analysis of complex silicate (rock) samples using alkali carbonate fusion and
ion-exchange separation, Chem. Geol., 142, 129–137, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Trumbull, R. B., Krienitz, M.-S., Grundmann, G., and Wiedenbeck M.:
Tourmaline geochemistry and <i>δ</i><sup>11</sup>B variations as a guide to
fluid–rock interaction in the Habachtal emerald deposit, Tauern Window,
Austria, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 157, 411–427, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Turekian, K. K. and Wedepohl, K. H.: Distribution of the elements in some
major units of the Earth's crust, Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 72, 175–192, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Valyashko, V. M.: Phase equilibria and properties of hydrothermal systems,
Nauka, Moscow, 270 pp., 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Veselá, P. and Lammerer, B.: The Pfitsch-Mörchner basin, an example
of the post-Variscan sedimentary evolution in the Tauern Window (eastern
Alps), Swiss J. Geosci., 101, 73–88, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Veselá, P., Söllner, F., Finger, F., and Gerdes, A.:
Magmato-sedimentary Carboniferous to Jurassic evolution of the western
Tauern window, eastern Alps (constraints from U-Pb zircon dating and
geochemistry), Int. J. Earth Sci., 100, 993–1027, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
von Goerne, G., Franz, G., and Heinrich, W.: Synthesis of tourmaline
solid solutions in the system
Na<sub>2</sub>O–MgO–Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–SiO<sub>2</sub>–B<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>–H<sub>2</sub>O–HCl
and the distribution of Na between tourmaline and fluid at 300 to
700&thinsp;°C and 200&thinsp;MPa, Contrib. Mineral. Petr.,
141, 160–173, 2001. 

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, L. B., Hervig, R. L., Holloway, J. R., and Hutcheon, I.: Boron
isotope geochemistry during diagenesis, Part 1. Experimental determination
of fractionation during illitization of smectite, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta,
65, 1769–1782, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, J. C., Stebbins, A., and Brookfield, M. E.: Geochemical changes
across a marginal marine Permo-Triassic boundary section on the Adria
carbonate platform at Brsnina, Slovenia, Int. J. Earth
Sci., 110, 923–942, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Wunder, B., Meixner, A., Romer, R. L., Wirth, R., and Heinrich, W.: The
geochemical cycle of boron: Constraints from boron isotope partitioning
experiments between mica and fluid, Lithos 84, 206–216, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, S., Neubauer, F., Liu, Y., Genser, J., Liu, B., Yu, S., Chang, R., and
Guan, Q.: Widespread Permian granite magmatism in Lower Austroalpine units:
significance for Permian rifting in the Eastern Alps, Swiss J.
Geosci., 113, 18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s00015-020-00371-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s00015-020-00371-5</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
