<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">EJM</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>European Journal of Mineralogy</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">EJM</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Eur. J. Mineral.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1617-4011</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/ejm-32-13-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Characterization of recovery onset by subgrain and grain boundary migration
in experimentally<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> deformed polycrystalline olivine</article-title><alt-title>Subgrain and grain boundary migration in experimentally
deformed olivine</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Subgrain and grain boundary migration in experimentally
deformed olivine}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{B.~C.~Nzogang et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nzogang</surname><given-names>Billy Clitton</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Thieme</surname><given-names>Manuel</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mussi</surname><given-names>Alexandre</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2093-0144</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Demouchy</surname><given-names>Sylvie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cordier</surname><given-names>Patrick</given-names></name>
          <email>patrick.cordier@univ-lille.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1883-2994</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Univ. Lille, CNRS, INRA, ENSCL, UMR 8207 – UMET – <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Unité
Matériaux et Transformations, 59000 Lille, France
</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, Geosciences Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier,
France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Patrick Cordier (patrick.cordier@univ-lille.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>15</day><month>January</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>32</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>13</fpage><lpage>26</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>20</day><month>February</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>July</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 Billy Clitton Nzogang et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020.html">This article is available from https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e121">To apprehend plate tectonics and the dynamics of the
lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary, composed principally of olivine, we
need to understand the mechanisms that control plastic deformation of
olivine in the relevant temperature domain. After more than 50 years of
laboratory studies and investigations on natural rocks, the interplay of
several key parameters (e.g. temperature, pressure, vacancy concentration,
dislocation densities, grain size, strain rate) controlling polycrystalline
olivine plasticity remains difficult to assess. Here, we study four olivine
polycrystals, which have been deformed in axial compression under a
confining pressure of 300 MPa, at 1273 or 1473 K. Despite significant
differences in mechanical properties (stress–strain curves), previous
characterization by scanning (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) did not reveal significant differences in dislocation microstructures
which could explain these contrasted behaviours. We have undertaken
automatic crystallographic orientation mapping (ACOM) analyses in TEM to
increase the spatial resolution of characterization compared to previously
obtained electron backscatter diffraction maps to further decipher the
microstructures at nanoscale. With this novel technique applied to olivine,
a noticeable difference in the onset of microstructural recovery has been
identified between specimens deformed at 1273 and 1473 K. The
microstructures of the olivine polycrystals deformed at 1473 K exhibit
numerous curved grain and subgrain boundaries, advocating for recovery by
boundary migration. In contrast, the microstructures of the olivine
polycrystals deformed at 1273 K have significantly fewer subgrain
boundaries and show more straight boundaries (i.e. closer to an equilibrium
microstructure) than in the specimen deformed at 1473 K. Characterization by
ACOM-TEM has permitted the identification of the onset of recovery, which is led by
boundary migration even for very low macroscopic finite strains.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e133">Olivine is the most abundant mineral phase in the Earth's upper mantle,
representing 60 %–80 % in volume. It is the only mineral phase
interconnected at centimetric and metric scales in peridotites. Thus, its
rheological properties are expected to control the plastic deformation of
the upper mantle, especially at the base of tectonic plates (i.e.
lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary). As such an important mineral, its
ductile deformation has been intensively studied by characterizing natural
mantle specimens, from peridotite xenoliths or tectonic massifs (e.g. Avé
Lallemant et al., 1970; Gueguen, 1979;  Ben Ismail and Mainprice, 1998;
Warren and Hirth, 2006;
Le Roux et al., 2007, 2008; Drury and Pennock, 2007; Jung, 2009; Drury et al., 2011;
Précigout and Hirth, 2014; Satsukawa and Michibayashi, 2014; Behr and
Platt, 2014) and by laboratory deformation experiments at high pressure and
high temperature on single crystals and polycrystals (e.g. Goetze, 1978; Bai
and Kohlstedt, 1992; Hirth and Kohlstedt, 2003; Mainprice et al., 2005; Hanson
and Spetzler, 1994; Demouchy et al., 2009, 2013, 2014; Thieme et al., 2018). The primary
aim of deformation<?pagebreak page14?> experiments was to provide generic (semi-empirical) flow
laws, which can be extrapolated to mantle strain rates
(10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and temperatures (773–1673 K). Over the
last five decades, laboratory experiments and numerical models have provided
a variety of flow laws (e.g. Mei and Kohlstedt, 2000a, b; Hirth and
Kohlstedt, 2003; Tielke et al., 2017; Boioli et al., 2015a, b; Gouriet et al., 2019), which
can be used to estimate the stress level in the mantle asthenosphere in both
the diffusion creep and the dislocation creep regimes. For the
asthenospheric mantle, deformation experiments at high temperatures
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1473</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K) permit one to reach steady-state flow easily for a small
amount of finite strain during creep tests (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %; e.g. Zimmerman
and Kohlstedt, 2004). As in metals, and in coarse-grain samples or single
crystals, development of strain hardening is commonly related to the
developed of dislocation entanglements (the so-called forest hardening;
e.g. Hanson and Spetzler, 1994; Gaboriaud et al., 1981). Dislocations
microstructures can be characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) or by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after dislocation
decoration by heat treatment (e.g. Kohlstedt, 1976). For fine-grained olivine
specimens (a few micrometres), intragranular dislocation activity was proposed
to be supplanted by grain boundary sliding (e.g. based on creep test; see
Hansen et al., 2011, Ree, 1994, or Landgon, 2006, for a review on grain
boundary sliding). Yet, this issue is still under debate as its
applicability to upper mantle remains very specific (e.g. Platt and Behr,
2011; Bollinger et al., 2019b; Gasc et al., 2019).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e195">Experimental deformation conditions and key parameters from EBSD
maps reported from Thieme et al. (2018). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for temperature; the confining
pressure was 300 MPa of Ar for each experiment. Stress is the differential
stress.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Strain rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Finite strain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GOS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">KAM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Duration</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(K)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(MPa)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(min)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CMT 16-4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1273</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">440</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CMT 16-8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1273</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">684</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">79</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CMT 16-9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1473</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">322</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">174</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CMT 16-13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1473</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">313</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e205"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The grain orientation spread (GOS) is the average deviation in
orientation between each point in a grain and the average orientation of the
respective grain.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Geometric mean of the log-normal distribution of the kernel average
misorientation (proxy for density of geometrically necessary dislocations),
2nd order, threshold of 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e549">However, for the lithospheric mantle, the experiments are facing a challenge
as stresses obtained in deformation experiments below 1073 K and at
laboratory strain rates (e.g. 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) do not reach steady state and
consequently render extrapolation to natural strain rates rather imprecise
(e.g. lower bound for stresses only; see Demouchy et al., 2013, and
Tielke et al., 2017, for discussion). In addition, microstructural investigations confirm that the
active slip systems at low and high temperatures are different (e.g. Raleigh,
1968; Phakey et al., 1972; Demouchy et al., 2009, 2013, 2014), with a high variety of
glide planes for [001] dislocations in olivine (Demouchy et al., 2013; Mussi et al.,
2014, 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e577">To investigate the plastic behaviour of olivine at lithospheric temperatures
(773–1173 K), where steady state cannot be reached experimentally, an
alternative approach is to use dislocation interactions identified in
experimentally deformed samples in glide and/or climb configurations at the
microscopic scale to implement specific rules into 2.5-dimension dislocation
dynamics models (e.g. Boioli et al., 2015a, b; Gouriet et al., 2019). With such numerical
models, deformation of crystalline solids at the slow strain rates relevant
for natural conditions can be reproduced (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and for a large temperature range). However so far, 2.5-D models
can only be applied to single crystals (e.g. Boioli et al., 2015b; Gouriet et al., 2019).
Recently, another attempt to extract flow law from deformation experiments
at high stress (2.7–5.3 GPa) and low temperature (298–873 K) was made by
Hansen et al. (2019), using a phenomenological approach and based on dislocation
activity; however, no microstructural characterization was provided.</p>
      <p id="d1e616">In a further attempt at constraining how polycrystalline olivine plastically
deforms at lithospheric mantle temperatures, Thieme et al. (2018) reported the
results of deformation of very fine-grained iron-bearing polycrystalline
olivine at two temperatures (1273 and 1473 K) for small finite strains. This
study has yielded very contrasted results at 1273 and 1473 K. At 1273 K a
strong hardening is observed. This is not the case at 1473 K where
deformation curves show a quasi-steady-state mechanical behaviour. The
microstructural investigation, based on electron backscatter diffraction
(EBSD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), could not identify the
origin for this difference in behaviour. Statistical parameters, such as
grain orientation spread (GOS) and kernel average misorientation (KAM),
which are considered suitable proxies for geometrically necessary dislocation (GND) density (e.g. Wallis et al.,
2016), did not reveal significant variations (see Fig. 4 and Table 2 in
Thieme et al., 2018, and Table 1 here). This difficulty is probably related to the
small finite strains involved. Indeed, TEM investigation showed large
heterogeneities and, even at 1473 K, multiple olivine grains remained free
of dislocations. These observations question the transferability of the
standard description of strain hardening established in metals at high
temperature (i.e. increase in dislocation density and dislocations–forest
interactions; Evans and Goetze, 1979) to olivine deformed at low strains
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and far from its melting temperature (e.g. transient creep at
1273–1473 K relative to melting temperature for Fo90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1973</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K).
Since the dislocation microstructures observed by Thieme et al. (2018) were not
significantly modified with increasing stress or finite strain, we propose
here to change the scale of observation, as compared to previous studies on
plastically deformed polycrystalline olivine (e.g. Demouchy et al., 2013, 2014;
Thieme et al., 2018) and to investigate the structure and behaviour of (sub)grain
boundaries which can contribute to recovery. Here recovery is used as
a collective term for all processes which restore the microstructure after
plastic deformation (e.g. annihilation and rearrangement of dislocations)
but
also subgrain growth, grain boundary migration, etc. The release of stored
energy provides the driving force for recovery although the nature of the
microstructure (including grain boundaries) is the controlling mechanisms.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e641">Differential stress versus strain curves for the four deformation experiments in axial compression (Thieme et al., 2018) investigated in this study.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e652">Morphology of the grains and grain boundaries in CMT16-13 deformed
at 1473 K. <bold>(a)</bold> Inverse pole figure (IPF) corresponding to the direction
normal to the figure superimposed with the indexation quality (IQ; see Eq. 1
and main text for details). The colour code refers to <italic>Pnma</italic> <bold>(b)</bold> Mis2Mean
distribution, from 0 to 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(c)</bold> KAM distribution
(3rd neighbours), from 0 to 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e692">In this study, we use automatic crystallographic orientation mapping in
transmission electron microscopy (ACOM-TEM) on experimentally deformed
polycrystalline olivine to identify the differential activity of
grain-boundary processes during plastic deformation.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page15?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
      <p id="d1e703">The samples analysed here were already described (Thieme et al., 2018). We recall
briefly the experimental conditions and the main results of the mechanical
data and microstructure characterization below. From the study of Thieme et al. (2018), we have selected four fine-grained polycrystalline olivine samples
(CMT16-4, CMT16-8, CMT16-9, and CMT16-13) deformed in axial compression at
constant displacement rates (Table 1) with small finite strains (below
9 %) under identical confining pressure (300 MPa of Ar), but at different
temperatures (1273 K for CMT16-4 and CMT16-8 and 1473 K for CMT16-9 and
CMT16-13). The polycrystalline samples were prepared from the same
fine-grained powder of San Carlos olivine (Arizona, USA), with an initial
grain size of 1.8–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The polycrystalline powder was first cold
pressed (2–20 MPa), then hot pressed for 3 h at 1473 K and 300 MPa of
confining pressure to reduce the porosity to less than 3 % (see also
Thieme et al., 2018). The hot-press step was directly followed by axial
compression when the targeted temperature was reached for deformation at
1473 K. For deformation at 1273 K (i.e. temperature lower than the hot press)
the temperature was decreased at a rate of 6.5 K min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and then kept constant
at 1273 K for at least 30 min to ensure satisfying stability of the
temperature distribution along the samples prior to axial compression.
Additional technical details are given in Thieme et al. (2018). The deformation
experiments were performed using a high-pressure, high-temperature
deformation apparatus (Paterson, 1990). Deformation conditions are
summarized in Table 1. Although the samples were deformed at the same
constant displacement rate, CMT 16-4 and CMT 16-8 did not reach steady state
(i.e. finite strain 1 %). Indeed, the strain must be corrected for the
ongoing elastic deformation of the vessel (stiffness of 82.5 kN mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
elasticity of the olivine (Young modulus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">152</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GPa at 1273 K and 146 GPa
at 1473 K, Liu et al., 2005) since they accommodate part of the imposed
displacement rate, resulting in different (slower) strain rates than for
quasi-steady-state experiments (i.e. CMT-16-8 and CMT 16-13).</p>
      <?pagebreak page16?><p id="d1e752">As expected from the low finite strain for the four deformation experiments,
the mechanical curves displayed in Fig. 1 indicate that steady state was not
reached, even for the two samples deformed at 1473 K: CMT16-13 and CMT16-9.
For these samples, the total finite strain is different (3.68 % and 8.59 % respectively), but the maximum stresses are comparable (313 and 322 MPa respectively) and slightly above the confining pressure. At 1273 K,
deformation experiments have been interrupted in a strong hardening regime
at 0.42 % for sample CMT16-4 and 1.07 % for CMT16-8. The corresponding
stresses are 440 and 684 MPa respectively, well above the confining
pressure of 300 MPa. The difference in stresses between the two pairs of
experiments is very high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> factor of 1.5) and was expected to
induce markedly different microstructures. The first round of
microstructural characterization by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and
EBSD, at the scale of the sample sections (large maps of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and small maps <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), led to the
following results: there are no significant differences in grain size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), aspect ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), internal
misorientation from mean orientation (Mis2Mean), grain orientation spread
(GOS, 0.58–0.59<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and kernel average misorientation (KAM)
between the samples. The KAM parameter is considered as a proxy for
dislocation density (at least for GNDs; see
Pantleon, 2008; Wheeler et al., 2009; Wallis et al., 2016), and values reported by Thieme
et al. (2018, between 0.28 and 0.3, Table 1) thus indicate that the dislocation
density is not observed to increase with the apparent strain hardening.</p>
      <p id="d1e852">After deformation, doubly-polished thin sections (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thick) parallel to the deformation axis were prepared. The sections were
glued on a grid (Cu or Mo) and ion milled at 5 kV under a low beam angle of
15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a Gatan<sup>®</sup> DuoMill<sup>™</sup> model 600 until
electron transparency was reached. The foils were subsequently covered with
a thin layer of carbon. The TEM observations were carried out at the
University of Lille (France) using an FEI<sup>®</sup> Tecnai G<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>-20 twin
microscope operating at 200 kV and a Philips CM30 microscope operating at
300 kV, both equipped with a LaB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> filament and using a double-tilt
sample holder.</p>
      <p id="d1e912">Conventional TEM investigations had been performed previously (Thieme et al.,
2018) and had reported, in the four samples, a heterogeneous distribution of
dislocations, with some olivine grains containing a high density of
dislocations (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in CMT16-9), and other grains
free of defects. Also, TEM images did not report the formation of more
dislocation entanglements (as an indicator of forest hardening) in the
high-stress sample (CMT16-8), as compared to the low-stress samples.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e945">Morphology of the grains and grain boundaries in CMT16-13 deformed
at 1473 K. <bold>(a)</bold> GOS distribution; <bold>(b)</bold> Mis2Mean distribution, from
0 to 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(c)</bold> KAM distribution (3rd neighbours),
from 0 to 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e981">In the present study, ACOM-TEM was operated in the TEM with the ASTAR<sup>™</sup>
tool from NanoMEGAS (Rauch and Véron, 2014) to improve the spatial
resolution of characterization. The TEM was set in micro-beam mode with a
nominal spot size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm without precession, thus better than the 70 nm
achieved in Thieme et al. (2018) and the 250 nm in Wallis et al. (2016). Here, the
incident electron beam, which was focused on the sample, was scanned over
the area with a step size of 6 nm, thanks to a dedicated hardware control
system of the TEM deflecting coils. In this mode, where a convergent beam
illuminates the sample, the diffraction pattern consists of discs. Using the
smallest condenser aperture (50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) the diffraction patterns are made
of very small spot-like discs and can be indexed as spot patterns. The
individual exposure time at each location was 10 ms. In this study, we used
precession illumination (with a precession angle of 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the
TEM, which allows many more reflections to be seen in the diffraction pattern
with intensities closer to the kinematical diffraction conditions.
Diffraction patterns were collected with an external Stingray CCD camera
directed toward the TEM phosphorous screen and are stored in the computer
memory for further indexation and post-processing. The diffraction patterns
were collected as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pixels at a camera length of 89 mm. This
distance was chosen to optimize the diffraction pattern for indexation.
Using the ASTAR<sup>™</sup> software, electron diffraction spot patterns were
indexed (providing the local crystal orientations) by comparing individually
obtained patterns via cross-correlation matching techniques with
pre-calculated electron diffraction templates which are generated every 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (orientation resolution). For iron-bearing olivine, templates
have been generated from the crystallographic data of Birle et al. (1968) for
forsterite. From this indexation within the <italic>Pnma</italic> space group, one obtains
crystallographic orientation maps, which display, with a colour-coding, the
most probable orientation at each scanned beam position.</p>
      <p id="d1e1044">The indexation quality (IQ) of the ACOM-TEM images is calculated from template
matching and is quantified by the following image correlation index (Rauch
and Dupuy, 2005):
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M57" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IQ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        In Eq. (1), the diffraction pattern is represented by the intensity function
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and every template <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is described by the function
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The highest IQ value corresponds to the retained
solution. The reliability of this solution can be quantified by the ratio of
the matching indexes for the two best solutions IQ<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and IQ<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M63" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IQ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IQ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
       <?pagebreak page17?> In reliability maps, the brighter the pixel (i.e. the higher the reliability
index), the more reliable the proposed indexation is. On the contrary,
darker pixels correspond to less reliable solutions. The latter is typically
the case at grain boundaries where two solutions of co-existing grains
overlap.</p>
      <p id="d1e1276">The datasets were processed with MTEX (free and open-source MATLAB<sup>™</sup>
Toolbox from Bachmann et al., 2011). Grain boundaries were identified where the
misorientation to the next pixel is higher than 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bachmann et al.,
2011). Groups of pixels below a size of 10 points have been ignored.</p>
      <p id="d1e1291">Note that the orientation dataset was a square-shaped grid for ASTAR, and
has been converted to a Channel5 file (i.e. .ctf file) for usage in MTEX.
To be able to detect deformation details in the microstructures, one must
use other tools than only the inverse pole figure colour-coding. In this
study, we use the orientation maps to calculate local misorientations as
recently developed in the EBSD community (e.g. Wright et al., 2011). As commonly used
in EBSD, several quantities can be calculated from the orientation maps:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1296">The kernel average misorientation (KAM) calculates the average
misorientation between a pixel and its neighbours, provided that the
misorientation does not exceed a predefined threshold value (e.g. 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); thus the incorporation of well-defined grain boundaries is avoided. If
plastic deformation results from dislocation glide and crystal-lattice
rotation, this approach allows quantitative evaluation of the local plastic
strain gradients (Godfrey et al., 2005) and provides a proxy for
GND density (e.g. Pantleon, 2008; Wheeler et al., 2009; Wallis et al., 2016). A kernel is a set
of points of prescribed size surrounding the scan point of interest. The
size of the kernel is generally prescribed to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th
nearest neighbours. Hence this parameter is sensitive to the step size of
the measurement grid and can be adjusted by the user as well. All KAM maps
presented in this study were calculated with a fixed kernel to the 3rd
neighbours.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1316">The grain orientation spread (GOS) is the average deviation in
orientation between each point in a grain and the average orientation of the
grain. This approach leads to assigning the same value of the GOS to every
scan point contained within a grain.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1320">The grain reference orientation deviation (GROD) is based on the
misorientation between a reference point of the considered grain and the
other points. The reference point can be the point of the grain where the
KAM is the lowest or the mean orientation of the considered grain. For the
latter specific case, the GROD is called the “Mis2Mean”. As for the GOS
values, the Mis2Mean values depend not only on the plastic strain, but also
on the mapped grain area fraction. Here, since at the TEM scale many grains
are not entirely mapped, the Mis2Mean value should be regarded as a
semi-quantitative tool only. The KAM, GROD, and GOS approaches provide
complementary information.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e1331">The ACOM areas mapped here are much smaller than previous maps obtained by
Thieme et al. (2018) with SEM-EBSD. Thus, we focus on the morphologies of the
grain and their boundaries, and on the intragranular microstructures instead
of a statistical approach. Indeed, from orientation maps shown in Fig. 2a,
the morphologies of the grain boundaries are defined at a higher spatial
resolution than in conventional EBSD-SEM and are more easily identified than
in conventional TEM, where images are impacted by the very strong
superimposed diffraction contrasts (see TEM images in subsequent figure
panels). On the ACOM maps, slight colour variations are indicative of
misorientations within grains, which are quantified by the GROD.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1336">Morphology of the grains and grain boundaries in CMT16-13 deformed
at 1473 K. <bold>(a)</bold> GOS map <bold>(b)</bold> Mis2Mean map, from 0
to 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(c)</bold> KAM map (3rd neighbours), from 0 to 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
GROD and KAM maps permit the identification of numerous subgrain boundaries; the
misorientation of some of them is indicated.
</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1374">Morphology of the grains and grain boundaries in CMT16-13 deformed
at 1473 K. <bold>(a)</bold> Inverse pole figure (IPF) corresponding to the direction
normal to the figure, superimposed with the indexation quality (IQ; see Eq. 1
and main text). <bold>(b)</bold> GOS map <bold>(c)</bold> Mis2Mean map, from 0 to
7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(d)</bold> KAM map (3rd neighbours), from 0 to
2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. GROD and KAM maps permit the identification of numerous subgrain
boundaries; the misorientation of some of them is indicated.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1418">Morphology of the grains and grain boundaries in CMT16-9 deformed
at 1473 K. <bold>(a)</bold> Conventional multi-beam TEM bright field. <bold>(b)</bold> Inverse pole
figure (IPF) corresponding to the direction normal to the figure,
superimposed with the indexation quality (IQ; see Eq. 1 and main text). <bold>(c)</bold> GOS map
<bold>(d)</bold> Mis2Mean map, from 0 to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(c)</bold> KAM map
(3rd neighbours), from 0 to 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Mis2Mean and KAM
maps are consistent in indicating stored elastic energy where dislocation
density is larger.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1463">Morphology of the grains and grain boundaries in CMT16-9 deformed
at 1473 K. <bold>(a)</bold> Inverse pole figure (IPF) corresponding to the direction
normal to the figure, superimposed with the indexation quality (IQ; see Eq. 1 and main text).
<bold>(b)</bold> GOS map <bold>(c)</bold> Mis2Mean map, from 0 to
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(d)</bold> KAM map (3rd neighbours), from 0 to
3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The pinning effect of the 2.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> subgrain boundary on
the 102–103<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grain boundary is clearly visible.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

<?pagebreak page18?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Microstructures at high temperature (1473\,K)}?><title>Microstructures at high temperature (1473 K)</title>
      <p id="d1e1529">A representative selection of ACOM images from samples CMT16-13 and CMT16-9
deformed at 1473 K are shown in Figs. 2 to 7. The inverse pole figure (IPF)
orientation maps and GOS maps in Figs. 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a, b, 6b, c, 7a and
b show that, in these samples, the grain boundaries are strongly curved,
even in case of small grains (Fig. 2a, the pink grain). Radii of curvature
can be locally of the order of only a few tens of nanometres. The merit of ACOM-TEM
is also to go beyond the statistical average per grain value of the GOS and
to map intragranular misorientation at higher spatial resolution than EBSD
(see Fig. 3 in Thieme et al., 2018, for a comparison). In Figs. 3, 4, and 5, grain
division into multiple crystallographic domains is visible. Misorientation
profiles across these domain boundaries (highlighted in the Mis2Mean and the
KAM maps) confirm their subgrain-boundary character and permit the
quantification of their individual misorientations. Examples of angular
determinations are reported directly in Figs. 2b, 3c, 4b, 4c, 5c, d, 6d,
e, 7c and d. The horizontal black arrow in Fig. 6 indicates bulging of the
95<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grain boundary, which is associated with a differential
dislocation density across the boundary (visible on the bright-field image
and leading consistently to the highest Mis2Mean contrast). In Fig. 7, a
horizontal 102–103<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grain boundary appears to be pinned by a
2.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> subgrain boundary.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page19?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Microstructures at low temperature (1273\,K)}?><title>Microstructures at low temperature (1273 K)</title>
      <p id="d1e1568">Representative orientation maps gathered on samples deformed at the lowest
temperature (samples CMT16-4 and CMT16-8) are presented in Figs. 8 to 11.
The grain boundaries are significantly less sinuous/curved than at high
temperature; more importantly, the interior of the grains show less
misoriented domains and subgrain boundary development, as demonstrated by
GOS maps in Figs. 8b, 9b, 10b and 11b and Mis2Mean maps in Figs. 8c, 9c, 10c
and 11c. The maps show a very different morphology than at high temperature,
with high heterogeneity of dislocation activity, even if very locally one
can also find some evidence of curved subgrain boundaries in samples
deformed at 1273 K (Fig. 12a, c, d). Also in Fig. 12, the 46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grain
boundary is not fully straight; indeed, the KAM map in Fig. 12d shows a
difference of intensity across the boundary and hence a difference of stored
strain energy, which can act as a driving force for boundary migration. It
is interesting to note in Fig. 8 a quadruple junction, with a void, which
could be indicative of damage due to grain boundary sliding (Ashby and
Verrall, 1973). Nevertheless, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions from
a single observation. Still, as an ensemble, the high-temperature and
low-temperature microstructures are different. In sample CMT16-8, one can
even find microstructures matching the formation of neograins. For example,
two bulges are identified in Fig. 13, which are associated with misoriented
domains terminated by a subgrain boundary (see the misorientation profiles).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e1582">Morphology of the grains and grain boundaries in CMT16-8 deformed
at 1273 K. <bold>(a)</bold> Conventional multi-beam TEM bright field <bold>(b)</bold> GOS map
<bold>(c)</bold> Mis2Mean map, from 0 to 7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(d)</bold> KAM map (3rd
neighbours), from 0 to 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e1625">Morphology of the grains and grain boundaries in CMT16-4 deformed
at 1273 K. <bold>(a)</bold> Conventional multi-beam TEM bright field. <bold>(b)</bold> Inverse pole
figure (IPF) corresponding to the direction normal to the figure,
superimposed with the indexation quality (IQ; see Eq. 1 and main text). <bold>(c)</bold> GOS map
<bold>(d)</bold> Mis2Mean map, from 0 to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(e)</bold> KAM map
(3rd neighbours), from 0 to 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e1670">Morphology of the grains and grain boundaries in CMT16-4 deformed
at 1273 K. <bold>(a)</bold> Conventional multi-beam TEM bright field. <bold>(b)</bold> Inverse pole
figure (IPF) corresponding to the direction normal to the figure,
superimposed with the indexation quality (IQ; see Eq. 1 and main text). <bold>(c)</bold> GOS
map <bold>(d)</bold> Mis2Mean map, from 0 to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(e)</bold> KAM map
(3rd neighbours), from 0 to 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e1715">Morphology of the grains and grain boundaries in CMT16-4 deformed
at 1273 K. <bold>(a)</bold> Conventional multi-beam TEM bright field. <bold>(b)</bold> Inverse pole
figure (IPF) corresponding to the direction normal to the figure,
superimposed with the indexation quality (IQ; see Eq. 1 and main text). <bold>(c)</bold> GOS map
<bold>(d)</bold> Mis2Mean map, from 0 to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(e)</bold> KAM map
(3rd neighbours), from 0 to 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e1760">Morphology of the grains and grain boundaries in CMT16-8 deformed
at 1273 K. <bold>(a)</bold> Inverse pole figure (IPF) corresponding to the vertical
direction, superimposed with the indexation quality (IQ; see Eq. 1 and main
text); <bold>(b)</bold> GOS map; <bold>(c)</bold> Mis2Mean map, from 0 to 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <bold>(d)</bold> KAM map (3rd neighbours), from 0 to 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e1803">Morphology of the grains and grain boundaries in CMT16-8 deformed
at 1273 K. <bold>(a)</bold> Inverse pole figure (IPF) corresponding to the direction
normal to the figure, superimposed with the indexation quality (IQ; Eq. 1); <bold>(b)</bold> Mis2Mean map,
from 0 to 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(c)</bold> KAM map
(3rd neighbours), from 0 to 1.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold>
show misorientation profiles across subgrain boundaries from <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://ejm.copernicus.org/articles/32/13/2020/ejm-32-13-2020-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Comparison with previous EBSD characterization</title>
      <?pagebreak page20?><p id="d1e1865">The deformation experiments conducted at 1273 and 1473 K on fine-grained
olivine polycrystals by Thieme et al. (2018) show markedly contrasted mechanical
behaviours, which are well illustrated in Fig. 1. At 1273 K, the
stress–strain curves exhibit significant strain hardening leading to
brittle failure after ca. 1 % of strain. In contrast, at 1473 K, the sample
is fully ductile and approaches mechanical steady state after ca. 3 % of
strain. Despite such markedly different mechanical behaviours and maximum
final stress, the dislocation microstructures and characterizations
performed in EBSD-SEM did not show any clear differences (e.g. GOS, KAM,
average grain size). Our results show that further investigation at higher
spatial resolution is necessary to identify the active mechanisms behind
microstructural recovery at lithospheric temperatures.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Strain-hardening versus thermally activated recovery</title>
      <p id="d1e1877">Plastic strain hardening is commonly observed in metals during cold working.
Indeed, contrary to silicates and ceramics, metals are significantly ductile
at low homologous temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> melting temperature). In
metals, during low-temperature deformation the dislocation density increases
due to mutual trapping of dislocations resulting from long-range
interactions and/or short-range junctions. This is facilitated in cubic
metals since, by symmetry, they have a large number of slip systems leading
to numerous configurations of junctions. This dislocation storage capacity
leads to an increase of the free energy of the material as dislocations are
sources of long-range elastic fields. This increase of free energy is the
driving force for an evolution to low-energy configurations (see Rollett et al., 2004, for a general description of these processes). This evolution is only
possible if the temperature is high enough (i.e. relative to melting temperature)
for specific mechanisms involved in recovery process to operate.</p>
      <p id="d1e1890">In olivine, the situation is different. In such a silicate, dislocation
mobility is strongly thermally activated and slower than in cubic metals and
alloys. This fact has already been mentioned in Thieme et al. (2018); it is however
difficult to assess dislocation mobility quantitatively on bulk specimens.
Here we focus on another aspect at mesoscopic scale. A major characteristic
of olivine is its plastic anisotropy. There exist only two slip directions
in olivine (Raleigh, 1968): [100] and [001]. Having orthogonal Burgers
vectors, dislocations from these slip systems have a very weak propensity to
form junctions (e.g. Durinck et al., 2007; Mussi et al., 2015). Hence the tendency for
dislocation storage is lower than in other crystallographic structures such
as cubic metals; indeed, we did not observe a clear correlation between
the total finite plastic strain and the dislocation density. Nevertheless,
since olivine does not exhibit enough independent slip systems to fulfil
the von Mises–Taylor criterion (Mises, 1928; Taylor, 1938; Ribe and Yu,
1991), dislocation activity rapidly builds internal stresses due to
incompatibilities between grains. This back stress is likely the origin of
the strong strain hardening observed at 1273 K (Fig. 1) reaching up to twice
the confining pressure, and which cannot be compensated by recovery
processes such as grain boundary migration driven by ionic diffusion.</p>
      <?pagebreak page22?><p id="d1e1893">At higher temperature (1473 K), the activation of recovery processes is
identified as the formation of mobile boundaries. We observe that, unlike
well-annealed structures commonly observed in natural samples, subgrain
boundaries are very curved or wavy, thus far from equilibrium. This
morphology is indicative of a driving force for migration (since surface
tension will tend to straighten the boundary). We propose that it is
indicative of recovery, essentially by boundary migration as reported by
Bollinger et al. (2019a).
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Dynamics recrystallization</title>
      <p id="d1e1905">Another mechanism that allows relaxation of stored strain energy is the
formation of new, dislocation-free grains (i.e. discontinuous dynamic
recrystallization, dDRX). This mechanism was observed in polycrystalline
olivine (Bollinger et al., 2019a), deformed at high pressure and at larger strains
(ca. 40 %). Here, finite strains are much smaller than in Bollinger et al. (2019a,
b); however we found indications that, locally, stress heterogeneities
can be strong enough to trigger small localized misoriented domains, which
can lead to the formation of neoformed grains as illustrated by Fig. 13. It
is important to remember that in an anisotropic structure like olivine, the
plastic strains reported in Table 1 represent macroscopic average values,
and that at the microscopic scale of our observations, actual local strains
and stress can deviate very significantly from these values (see for
instance Barbe et al., 2001).</p>
      <p id="d1e1908">Strictly speaking, dynamic recrystallization (DRX) is known to induce
strain-softening in olivine in the temperature range between 973 and 1573 K
(Drury, 2005) and to involve a wide range of possible mechanisms (Drury and
Urai, 1990; Rollett et al., 2004). The formation of new, undeformed grains
represents a strong indication of dynamic recrystallization, which usually
requires a large strain to develop (Bollinger et al., 2019a, b). Here we analyse
experiments with low macroscopic strains, although evidence for neoformed
grains in formation could be postulated (e.g.<?pagebreak page23?> Fig. 13), and we propose that
boundary migration is already an active mechanism in our samples at high
temperature even for low macroscopic finite strain. The role of boundary
migration in dynamic recrystallization has already been proposed (Drury and
Urai, 1990; Drury and Pennock, 2007) as part of rotation recrystallization
mechanisms (rDRX; see Drury and Pennock, 2007). The microstructure
observed in Fig. 13 is comparable to those reported in polycrystalline
copper (Miura et al., 2007) and ice (Chauve et al., 2017), which were interpreted as
nuclei for neograins during discontinuous dynamic recrystallization (dDRX).
This mechanism has also been identified recently by Bollinger et al. (2019a) in
polycrystalline forsterite deformed at high pressure (3.5–5 GPa) to large
strains (25 %–40 %). Here, although there is no evolution in the average
grain size (1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the four samples), evidence for the onset of
DRX is indicated by discrete grain-boundary migration.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1931">Our study, using a novel ACOM-TEM technique, has permitted us to further
address the role of grain and subgrain boundaries as an active agent of
recovery at lithospheric temperatures in polycrystalline olivine. It
indicates that grain-boundary migration and bulging play a noticeable role
during the onset of recovery (low macroscopic finite strain), before
variation of the average grain size can be observed. Several issues remain
to be investigated such as the role of other grain-boundary degrees of
freedom, namely sliding (i.e. motion restricted to direction parallel to grain
interfaces), which could also contribute to either recovery or strain but
for which, with the technique employed here, we lack clear markers.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e1938">The raw data (orientation maps for Figs. 2 to 13) supporting this publication can be
accessed at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3492179" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3492179</ext-link> (Nzogang et al., 2019).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e1947">MT and SD provided the specimens. BCN, AM, and PC performed the TEM observations. BCN processed the data. All authors discussed and interpreted the results and implications. PC, SD, and AM wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e1953">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1959">We
thank Christophe  Nevado and Doriane  Delmas  for providing high-quality thin sections for
TEM. The TEM in Lille is supported by the Institut National de Sciences de
l'Univers (INSU) du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS,
France), and by the Conseil Régional des Hauts-de-France<?pagebreak page24?> (France). We
thank the editors of <italic>EJM</italic> for handling the manuscript
and David Wallis and an
anonymous reviewer for constructive reviews.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e1967">This research has been supported by the European
Commission (RHEOMAN (grant no.  290424)) and the European Commission
(CREEP (grant no. 642029)).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e1973">This paper was edited by Elisabetta Rampone
and reviewed by David Wallis and an anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ashby, M. F. and Verrall, R. A.: Diffusion-accommodated flow and
superplasticity, Acta Met., 21, 149–163,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(73)90057-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0001-6160(73)90057-6</ext-link>, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Avé Lallemant, H. G. and Carter, N. L.: Syntectonic recrystallization of
olivine and modes of flow in the upper mantle, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.,
81, 2203–2220,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1970)81[2203:SROOAM]2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/0016-7606(1970)81[2203:SROOAM]2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bachmann, F., Hielscher, R., and Schaeben, H.: Grain detection from 2d and
3d EBSD data – Specification of the MTEX algorithm, Ultramicroscopy, 111,
1720–1733,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.08.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.08.002</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bai, Q. and Kohlstedt, D. L.: High-temperature creep of olivine single
crystals III. Mechanical results for unbuffered samples and creep
mechanisms, Philos. Mag. A, 66, 1149–1181,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01418619208248011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01418619208248011</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Barbe, F., Forest, S., and Cailletaud, G.: Intergranular and intragranular
behavior of polycrystalline aggregates. Part 2: Results, Int. J. Plasticity,
17, 537–563,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00062-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00062-0</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Behr, W. M. and Platt, J. P.: Brittle faults are weak, yet the ductile
middle crust is strong: Implications for lithospheric mechanics, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 8067–8075, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL061349</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ben Ismail, W. and Mainprice, D.: An olivine fabric database: an overview
of upper mantle fabrics and seismic anisotropy, Tectonophysics, 296,
145–158,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00141-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00141-3</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Birle, J. D., Gibbs, G. V., Moore, P. B., and Smith, J. V.: Crystal structures
of natural olivines, Am. Mineral., 53, 807–824, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boioli, F., Carrez, P., Cordier, P., Devincre, B., and Marquille, M.:
Modeling the creep properties of olivine by 2.5-dimensional dislocation
dynamics simulations, Phys. Rev. B, 92, 014115,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.014115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevB.92.014115</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boioli, F., Tommasi, A., Cordier, P., Demouchy, S., and Mussi, A.: Low
steady-state stresses in the cold lithospheric mantle inferred from
dislocation dynamics models of dislocation creep in olivine, Earth Planet.
Sc. Lett., 432, 232–242,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.10.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2015.10.012</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bollinger, C., Nzogang, B. C., Mussi, A., Bouquerel, J., Molodov, D. A., and
Cordier, P.: Microstructural evidence for grain boundary migration and
dynamic recrystallization in experimentally deformed forsterite aggregates,
Minerals, 9, 17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/min9010017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/min9010017</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bollinger, C., Marquardt, K., and Ferreira, F.: Intragranular plasticity vs.
grain boundary sliding (GBS) in forsterite: Microstructural evidence at high
pressures (3.5–5.0 GPa), Am. Mineral., 104, 220–231,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2019-6629" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2138/am-2019-6629</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chauve, T., Montagnat, M., Barou, F., Hidas, K., Tommasi, A., and Mainprice,
D.: Investigation of nucleation processes during dynamic recrystallization
of ice using cryo-EBSD, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 375, 20150345,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0345" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2015.0345</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Demouchy, S., Schneider, S. E., Mackwell, S. J., Zimmerman, M. E., and
Kohlstedt, D. L.: Experimental deformation of olivine single crystals at
lithospheric temperatures, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, 1–55,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036611" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL036611</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Demouchy, S., Tommasi, A., Ballaran, T. B., and Cordier, P.: Low strength of
Earth's uppermost mantle inferred from tri-axial deformation experiments on
dry olivine crystals, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 220, 37–49,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2013.04.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pepi.2013.04.008</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Demouchy, S., Mussi, A., Barou, F., Tommasi, A., and Cordier, P.:
Viscoplasticity of polycrystalline olivine experimentally deformed at high
pressure and 900 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Tectonophysics, 623, 123–135,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.03.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2014.03.022</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Drury, M. R.: Dynamic recrystallization and strain softening of olivine
aggregates in the Laboratory and the Lithosphere, Geol. Soc., 243, 143–158,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.243.01.11" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.243.01.11</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Drury, M. R., Avé Lallemant, H. G., Pennock, G. M., and Palasseac, L. N.:
Crystal preferred orientation in peridotite ultramylonites deformed by grain
size sensitive creep, Étang de Lers, Pyrenees, France, J. Struct. Geol.,
33, 1776–1789,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2011.10.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsg.2011.10.002</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Drury, M. R. and Pennock, G. M.: Subgrain Rotation Recrystallization in
Minerals, Mater. Sci. Forum, 550, 95–104,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.550.95" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.550.95</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Drury, M. R. and Urai, J. L.: Deformation-related recrystallization
processes, Tectonophysics, 172, 235–253,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90033-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(90)90033-5</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Durinck, J., Devincre, B., Kubin, L., and Cordier, P.: Modeling the plastic
deformation of olivine by dislocation dynamics simulations, Am. Mineral.,
92, 1346–1357,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2007.2512" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2138/am.2007.2512</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Evans, B. and Goetze, C.: The temperature variation of hardness of olivine
and its implication for polycrystalline yield stress, J. Geophys. Res., 84,
5505–5524,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB10p05505" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB084iB10p05505</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gaboriaud, R. J., Darot, M., Gueguen, Y., and Woirgard, J.: Dislocations in
olivine indented at low-temperatures, Phys. Chem. Miner., 7, 100–104,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309460" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00309460</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gasc, J., Demouchy, S., Barou, F., Koizumi, S., and Cordier, P.: Creep
mechanisms in the lithospheric mantle inferred from deformation of iron-free
forsterite aggregates at 900–1200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Tectonophysics,   761, 16–30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.04.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2019.04.009</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Godfrey, A., Cao, W. Q., Hansen, N., and Liu, Q.: Stored energy,
microstructure, and flow stress of deformed metals, Metall. Mater. Trans. A,
36, 2371–2378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-005-0109-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11661-005-0109-0</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goetze, C.: The mechanism of creep in olivine, Philos. T. R. Soc A,
288, 99–119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1978.0008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.1978.0008</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page25?><ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gouriet, K., Cordier, P., Garel, F., Thoraval, C., Demouchy, S., Tommasi,
A., and Carrez, P.: Dislocation Dynamics modelling of the power-law
breakdown in olivine single crystals: toward a unified creep law for the
upper mantle, Earth Planet Sc. Lett., 506, 282–291,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.10.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2018.10.049</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gueguen, Y.: Dislocations in naturally deformed terrestrial olivine:
classification, interpretation, application, B. Mineral., 102,
178–183,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3406/bulmi.1979.7273" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3406/bulmi.1979.7273</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hansen, L. N., Zimmerman, M. E., and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Grain boundary sliding
in San Carlos olivine: Flow law parameters and crystallographic preferred
orientation, J. Geophys. Res., 116, B08201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008220" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JB008220</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hansen, L. N., Kumamoto, K. M., Thom, C. A., Wallis, D., Durham, W. B., Goldsby,
D. L., Breithaupt, T., Meyers, C. D., and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Low-temperature
plasticity in olivine: Grain size, strain hardening, and the strength of the
lithosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,  116, B08201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016736" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JB016736</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hanson, D. R. and Spetzler, H. A.: Transient creep in natural and synthetic,
iron-bearing olivine single crystals: mechanical results and dislocation
microstructures, Tectonophysics, 235, 293–315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)90191-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(94)90191-0</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hirth, G. and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Rheology of the upper mantle and the mantle
wedge: a view from the experimentalists, in: Inside The Subduction Factory,
AGU, Washington, 83–105,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/138GM06" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/138GM06</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jung, H.: Deformation fabrics of olivine in Val Malenco peridotite found in
Italy and implications for the seismic anisotropy in the upper mantle,
Lithos, 109, 341–349,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2008.06.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.lithos.2008.06.007</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kohlstedt, D. L., Goetze, C., Durham, W. B., and Vander Sande, J.: New
technique for decorating dislocations in olivine, Science, 191, 1045–1046,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.191.4231.1045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.191.4231.1045</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Langdon, T. G.: Grain boundary sliding revisited: Developments in sliding
over four decades, J. Mater Sci., 41,  597–609 <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-6476-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10853-006-6476-0</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Le Roux, V., Bodinier, J. L., Tommasi, A., Alard, O., Dautria, J. M., Vauchez,
A., and Riches, A. J. V.: The Lherz spinel lherzolite: refertilized rather
than pristine mantle, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 259, 599–612,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.05.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2007.05.026</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Le Roux, V., Tommasi, A., and Vauchez, A.: Feedback between melt percolation
and deformation in an exhumed lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 274, 401–413,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.053</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, W., Kung, J., and Li, B.: Elasticity of San Carlos olivine to 8 GPa and
1073 K,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L16301,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023453</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mainprice, D., Tommasi, A., Couvy, H., Cordier, P., and Frost, D. J.:
Pressure sensitivity of olivine slip systems and seismic anisotropy of the
Earth's upper mantle, Nature, 433, 731–733,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature03266</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mei, S. and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Influence of water on plastic deformation of olivine aggregates: 1. Diffusion creep regime, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 21457–21469, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900179" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JB900179</ext-link>, 2000a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mei, S. and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Influence of water on plastic deformation of olivine aggregates 2. Dislocation creep regime, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 21471–21481, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900180" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JB900180</ext-link>, 2000b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mises, R. V.: Mechanik der plastischen Formänderung von Kristallen, Z.
Angew. Math. Me., 8, 161–185,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19280080302" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/zamm.19280080302</ext-link>, 1928.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miura, H., Sakai, T., Mogawa, R., and Jonas, J. J.: Nucleation of dynamic
recrystallization and variant selection in copper bicrystals, Philos. Mag.,
87, 4197–4209,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430701532780" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/14786430701532780</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mussi, A., Cordier, P., Demouchy, S., and Vanmansart, C.: Characterization
of the glide planes of the [001] screw dislocations in olivine using
electron tomography, Phys. Chem. Miner., 41, 537–545,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00269-014-0665-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00269-014-0665-1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mussi, A., Cordier, P., and Demouchy, S.: Characterization of dislocation
interactions in olivine using electron tomography, Philos. Mag., 95,
335–345, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2014.1000996" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/14786435.2014.1000996</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mussi, A., Cordier, P., Demouchy, S., and Hue, B.: Hardening mechanisms in
olivine single crystal deformed at 1090 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C: an electron
tomography study, Philos. Mag.,  97, 3172–3185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2017.1367858" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/14786435.2017.1367858</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nzogang, B. C., Thieme, M.,  Mussi,  A.,  Demouchy, S., and  Cordier, P.:  Research data supporting for “Characterization of recovery onset by subgrain and grain boundary migration in experimentally deformed polycrystalline olivine” [Data set], Zenodo, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3492179" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3492179</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pantleon, W.: Resolving the geometrically necessary dislocation content by
conventional electron backscattering diffraction, Scripta Mater., 58,
994–997,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.050" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.050</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paterson, M. S.: Rock deformation experimentation, in: The Brittle-Ductile
transition in rocks: the Heard volume, edited by:  Duba, A. G.,  Durham, W. B.,  Handin, J. W.,
and  Wang, H. F.,  Geophysical Monograph Series, AGU, Washington, 187–194,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM056p0187" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GM056p0187</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Phakey, P., Dollinger, G., and Christie, J.: Transmission electron
microscopy of experimentally deformed olivine crystals, in: Flow and
Fracture of Rocks, American Geophysical Union,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM016p0117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GM016p0117</ext-link>, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Platt, J. P. and Behr, W. M.: Grainsize evolution in ductile shear zones:
Implications for strain localization and the strength of the lithosphere, J.
Struct. Geol., 33, 537–550,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2011.01.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jsg.2011.01.018</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Précigout, J. and Hirth, G.: B-type olivine fabric induced by grain
boundary sliding, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 395, 231–240,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.03.052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2014.03.052</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Raleigh, C. B.: Mechanisms of plastic deformation of olivine, J. Geophys.
Res., 73, 5391–5406,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB073i016p05391" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB073i016p05391</ext-link>,
1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rauch, E. F. and Dupuy, L.: Rapid spot diffraction patterns identification
through template matching, Arch. Metall. Mater., 50, 87–99, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rauch, E. F. and Véron, M.: Automated crystal orientation and phase
mapping in TEM, Mater. Charact., 98, 1–9,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2014.08.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.matchar.2014.08.010</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ree, J. H.: Grain boundary sliding and development of grain boundary opening
in experimentally deformed octachloropropane, J. Struct. Geol., 16,
403–418,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(94)90044-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0191-8141(94)90044-2</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page26?><ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ribe, N. and Yu, Y.: A theory for plastic deformation and textural
evolution of olivine polycrystals, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 8325–8335,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/90JB02721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/90JB02721</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rollett, A., Humphreys, F. J., Rohrer, G. S., and Hatherly, M.:
Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena, 2nd Edn., Elsevier,
Oxford, UK, 658 pp., ISBN 9780080441641, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Satsukawa, T. and Michibayashi, K.: Flow in the uppermost mantle during
back-arc spreading revealed by Ichinomegata peridotite xenoliths, NE Japan,
Lithos, 189, 89–104,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2013.10.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.lithos.2013.10.035</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Taylor, G. I.: Plastic strain in metals, J. l. Met., 62, 307–324, 1938.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thieme, M., Demouchy, S., Mainprice, D., Barou, F., and Cordier, P.: Stress
evolution and associated microstructure during transient creep of olivine at
1000–1200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 278, 34–46,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2018.03.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pepi.2018.03.002</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tielke, J. A., Zimmerman, M. E., and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Hydrolytic weakening in
olivine single crystals, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 3465–3479,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JB014004</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wallis, D., Hansen, L. N., Ben Britton, T., and Wilkinson, A. J.:
Geometrically necessary dislocation densities in olivine obtained using
high-angular resolution electron backscatter diffraction, Ultramicroscopy,
168, 34–45,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.06.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.06.002</ext-link>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Warren, J. M. and Hirth, G.: Grain size sensitive deformation mechanisms in
naturally deformed peridotites, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 248, 438–450,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.06.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2006.06.006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wheeler, J., Mariani, E., Piazolo, S., Prior, D. J., Trimby, P., and Drury, M. R.:
The weighted Burgers vector: a new quantity for constraining
dislocation densities and types using electron backscatter diffraction on 2D
sections through crystalline materials, J. Microscopy, 233, 482–494,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03136.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03136.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wright, S. I., Nowell, M. M., and Field, D. P.: A review of strain analysis
using electron backscatter diffraction, Microsc. Microanal., 17, 316–329,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927611000055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S1431927611000055</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zimmerman, M. E. and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Rheological properties of partially
molten lherzolite, J. Petrol., 45, 275–298,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egg089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/petrology/egg089</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Characterization of recovery onset by subgrain and grain boundary migration in experimentally deformed polycrystalline olivine</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>To apprehend plate tectonics and the dynamics of the
lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary, composed principally of olivine, we
need to understand the mechanisms that control plastic deformation of
olivine in the relevant temperature domain. After more than 50 years of
laboratory studies and investigations on natural rocks, the interplay of
several key parameters (e.g. temperature, pressure, vacancy concentration,
dislocation densities, grain size, strain rate) controlling polycrystalline
olivine plasticity remains difficult to assess. Here, we study four olivine
polycrystals, which have been deformed in axial compression under a
confining pressure of 300&thinsp;MPa, at 1273 or 1473&thinsp;K. Despite significant
differences in mechanical properties (stress–strain curves), previous
characterization by scanning (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) did not reveal significant differences in dislocation microstructures
which could explain these contrasted behaviours. We have undertaken
automatic crystallographic orientation mapping (ACOM) analyses in TEM to
increase the spatial resolution of characterization compared to previously
obtained electron backscatter diffraction maps to further decipher the
microstructures at nanoscale. With this novel technique applied to olivine,
a noticeable difference in the onset of microstructural recovery has been
identified between specimens deformed at 1273 and 1473&thinsp;K. The
microstructures of the olivine polycrystals deformed at 1473&thinsp;K exhibit
numerous curved grain and subgrain boundaries, advocating for recovery by
boundary migration. In contrast, the microstructures of the olivine
polycrystals deformed at 1273&thinsp;K have significantly fewer subgrain
boundaries and show more straight boundaries (i.e. closer to an equilibrium
microstructure) than in the specimen deformed at 1473&thinsp;K. Characterization by
ACOM-TEM has permitted the identification of the onset of recovery, which is led by
boundary migration even for very low macroscopic finite strains.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ashby, M. F. and Verrall, R. A.: Diffusion-accommodated flow and
superplasticity, Acta Met., 21, 149–163,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(73)90057-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(73)90057-6</a>, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Avé Lallemant, H. G. and Carter, N. L.: Syntectonic recrystallization of
olivine and modes of flow in the upper mantle, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.,
81, 2203–2220,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1970)81[2203:SROOAM]2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1970)81[2203:SROOAM]2.0.CO;2</a>, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bachmann, F., Hielscher, R., and Schaeben, H.: Grain detection from 2d and
3d EBSD data – Specification of the MTEX algorithm, Ultramicroscopy, 111,
1720–1733,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.08.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.08.002</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bai, Q. and Kohlstedt, D. L.: High-temperature creep of olivine single
crystals III. Mechanical results for unbuffered samples and creep
mechanisms, Philos. Mag. A, 66, 1149–1181,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01418619208248011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01418619208248011</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Barbe, F., Forest, S., and Cailletaud, G.: Intergranular and intragranular
behavior of polycrystalline aggregates. Part 2: Results, Int. J. Plasticity,
17, 537–563,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00062-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00062-0</a>,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Behr, W. M. and Platt, J. P.: Brittle faults are weak, yet the ductile
middle crust is strong: Implications for lithospheric mechanics, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 41, 8067–8075, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061349</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Ben Ismail, W. and Mainprice, D.: An olivine fabric database: an overview
of upper mantle fabrics and seismic anisotropy, Tectonophysics, 296,
145–158,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00141-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00141-3</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Birle, J. D., Gibbs, G. V., Moore, P. B., and Smith, J. V.: Crystal structures
of natural olivines, Am. Mineral., 53, 807–824, 1968.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Boioli, F., Carrez, P., Cordier, P., Devincre, B., and Marquille, M.:
Modeling the creep properties of olivine by 2.5-dimensional dislocation
dynamics simulations, Phys. Rev. B, 92, 014115,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.014115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.014115</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Boioli, F., Tommasi, A., Cordier, P., Demouchy, S., and Mussi, A.: Low
steady-state stresses in the cold lithospheric mantle inferred from
dislocation dynamics models of dislocation creep in olivine, Earth Planet.
Sc. Lett., 432, 232–242,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.10.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.10.012</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bollinger, C., Nzogang, B. C., Mussi, A., Bouquerel, J., Molodov, D. A., and
Cordier, P.: Microstructural evidence for grain boundary migration and
dynamic recrystallization in experimentally deformed forsterite aggregates,
Minerals, 9, 17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/min9010017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/min9010017</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bollinger, C., Marquardt, K., and Ferreira, F.: Intragranular plasticity vs.
grain boundary sliding (GBS) in forsterite: Microstructural evidence at high
pressures (3.5–5.0&thinsp;GPa), Am. Mineral., 104, 220–231,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2019-6629" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2019-6629</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chauve, T., Montagnat, M., Barou, F., Hidas, K., Tommasi, A., and Mainprice,
D.: Investigation of nucleation processes during dynamic recrystallization
of ice using cryo-EBSD, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 375, 20150345,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0345" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0345</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Demouchy, S., Schneider, S. E., Mackwell, S. J., Zimmerman, M. E., and
Kohlstedt, D. L.: Experimental deformation of olivine single crystals at
lithospheric temperatures, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, 1–55,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036611" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036611</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Demouchy, S., Tommasi, A., Ballaran, T. B., and Cordier, P.: Low strength of
Earth's uppermost mantle inferred from tri-axial deformation experiments on
dry olivine crystals, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 220, 37–49,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2013.04.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2013.04.008</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Demouchy, S., Mussi, A., Barou, F., Tommasi, A., and Cordier, P.:
Viscoplasticity of polycrystalline olivine experimentally deformed at high
pressure and 900&thinsp;°C, Tectonophysics, 623, 123–135,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.03.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2014.03.022</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Drury, M. R.: Dynamic recrystallization and strain softening of olivine
aggregates in the Laboratory and the Lithosphere, Geol. Soc., 243, 143–158,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.243.01.11" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.243.01.11</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Drury, M. R., Avé Lallemant, H. G., Pennock, G. M., and Palasseac, L. N.:
Crystal preferred orientation in peridotite ultramylonites deformed by grain
size sensitive creep, Étang de Lers, Pyrenees, France, J. Struct. Geol.,
33, 1776–1789,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2011.10.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2011.10.002</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Drury, M. R. and Pennock, G. M.: Subgrain Rotation Recrystallization in
Minerals, Mater. Sci. Forum, 550, 95–104,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.550.95" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.550.95</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Drury, M. R. and Urai, J. L.: Deformation-related recrystallization
processes, Tectonophysics, 172, 235–253,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90033-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(90)90033-5</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Durinck, J., Devincre, B., Kubin, L., and Cordier, P.: Modeling the plastic
deformation of olivine by dislocation dynamics simulations, Am. Mineral.,
92, 1346–1357,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2007.2512" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2007.2512</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Evans, B. and Goetze, C.: The temperature variation of hardness of olivine
and its implication for polycrystalline yield stress, J. Geophys. Res., 84,
5505–5524,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB10p05505" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB10p05505</a>, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Gaboriaud, R. J., Darot, M., Gueguen, Y., and Woirgard, J.: Dislocations in
olivine indented at low-temperatures, Phys. Chem. Miner., 7, 100–104,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309460" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309460</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Gasc, J., Demouchy, S., Barou, F., Koizumi, S., and Cordier, P.: Creep
mechanisms in the lithospheric mantle inferred from deformation of iron-free
forsterite aggregates at 900–1200&thinsp;°C, Tectonophysics,   761, 16–30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.04.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.04.009</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Godfrey, A., Cao, W. Q., Hansen, N., and Liu, Q.: Stored energy,
microstructure, and flow stress of deformed metals, Metall. Mater. Trans. A,
36, 2371–2378, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-005-0109-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-005-0109-0</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Goetze, C.: The mechanism of creep in olivine, Philos. T. R. Soc A,
288, 99–119, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1978.0008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1978.0008</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gouriet, K., Cordier, P., Garel, F., Thoraval, C., Demouchy, S., Tommasi,
A., and Carrez, P.: Dislocation Dynamics modelling of the power-law
breakdown in olivine single crystals: toward a unified creep law for the
upper mantle, Earth Planet Sc. Lett., 506, 282–291,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.10.049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.10.049</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Gueguen, Y.: Dislocations in naturally deformed terrestrial olivine:
classification, interpretation, application, B. Mineral., 102,
178–183,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3406/bulmi.1979.7273" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3406/bulmi.1979.7273</a>, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, L. N., Zimmerman, M. E., and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Grain boundary sliding
in San Carlos olivine: Flow law parameters and crystallographic preferred
orientation, J. Geophys. Res., 116, B08201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008220" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008220</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, L. N., Kumamoto, K. M., Thom, C. A., Wallis, D., Durham, W. B., Goldsby,
D. L., Breithaupt, T., Meyers, C. D., and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Low-temperature
plasticity in olivine: Grain size, strain hardening, and the strength of the
lithosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,  116, B08201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016736" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016736</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hanson, D. R. and Spetzler, H. A.: Transient creep in natural and synthetic,
iron-bearing olivine single crystals: mechanical results and dislocation
microstructures, Tectonophysics, 235, 293–315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)90191-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)90191-0</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hirth, G. and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Rheology of the upper mantle and the mantle
wedge: a view from the experimentalists, in: Inside The Subduction Factory,
AGU, Washington, 83–105,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/138GM06" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/138GM06</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Jung, H.: Deformation fabrics of olivine in Val Malenco peridotite found in
Italy and implications for the seismic anisotropy in the upper mantle,
Lithos, 109, 341–349,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2008.06.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2008.06.007</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kohlstedt, D. L., Goetze, C., Durham, W. B., and Vander Sande, J.: New
technique for decorating dislocations in olivine, Science, 191, 1045–1046,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.191.4231.1045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.191.4231.1045</a>, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Langdon, T. G.: Grain boundary sliding revisited: Developments in sliding
over four decades, J. Mater Sci., 41,  597–609 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-6476-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-6476-0</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Le Roux, V., Bodinier, J. L., Tommasi, A., Alard, O., Dautria, J. M., Vauchez,
A., and Riches, A. J. V.: The Lherz spinel lherzolite: refertilized rather
than pristine mantle, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 259, 599–612,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.05.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.05.026</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Le Roux, V., Tommasi, A., and Vauchez, A.: Feedback between melt percolation
and deformation in an exhumed lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 274, 401–413,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.053" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.053</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, W., Kung, J., and Li, B.: Elasticity of San Carlos olivine to 8&thinsp;GPa and
1073&thinsp;K,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L16301,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023453</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Mainprice, D., Tommasi, A., Couvy, H., Cordier, P., and Frost, D. J.:
Pressure sensitivity of olivine slip systems and seismic anisotropy of the
Earth's upper mantle, Nature, 433, 731–733,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03266</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Mei, S. and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Influence of water on plastic deformation of olivine aggregates: 1. Diffusion creep regime, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 21457–21469, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900179" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900179</a>, 2000a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Mei, S. and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Influence of water on plastic deformation of olivine aggregates 2. Dislocation creep regime, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 21471–21481, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900180" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900180</a>, 2000b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Mises, R. V.: Mechanik der plastischen Formänderung von Kristallen, Z.
Angew. Math. Me., 8, 161–185,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19280080302" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19280080302</a>, 1928.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Miura, H., Sakai, T., Mogawa, R., and Jonas, J. J.: Nucleation of dynamic
recrystallization and variant selection in copper bicrystals, Philos. Mag.,
87, 4197–4209,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430701532780" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430701532780</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Mussi, A., Cordier, P., Demouchy, S., and Vanmansart, C.: Characterization
of the glide planes of the [001] screw dislocations in olivine using
electron tomography, Phys. Chem. Miner., 41, 537–545,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00269-014-0665-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00269-014-0665-1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Mussi, A., Cordier, P., and Demouchy, S.: Characterization of dislocation
interactions in olivine using electron tomography, Philos. Mag., 95,
335–345, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2014.1000996" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2014.1000996</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Mussi, A., Cordier, P., Demouchy, S., and Hue, B.: Hardening mechanisms in
olivine single crystal deformed at 1090&thinsp;°C: an electron
tomography study, Philos. Mag.,  97, 3172–3185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2017.1367858" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2017.1367858</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Nzogang, B. C., Thieme, M.,  Mussi,  A.,  Demouchy, S., and  Cordier, P.:  Research data supporting for “Characterization of recovery onset by subgrain and grain boundary migration in experimentally deformed polycrystalline olivine” [Data set], Zenodo, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3492179" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3492179</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Pantleon, W.: Resolving the geometrically necessary dislocation content by
conventional electron backscattering diffraction, Scripta Mater., 58,
994–997,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.050" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.050</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Paterson, M. S.: Rock deformation experimentation, in: The Brittle-Ductile
transition in rocks: the Heard volume, edited by:  Duba, A. G.,  Durham, W. B.,  Handin, J. W.,
and  Wang, H. F.,  Geophysical Monograph Series, AGU, Washington, 187–194,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM056p0187" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GM056p0187</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Phakey, P., Dollinger, G., and Christie, J.: Transmission electron
microscopy of experimentally deformed olivine crystals, in: Flow and
Fracture of Rocks, American Geophysical Union,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM016p0117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GM016p0117</a>, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Platt, J. P. and Behr, W. M.: Grainsize evolution in ductile shear zones:
Implications for strain localization and the strength of the lithosphere, J.
Struct. Geol., 33, 537–550,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2011.01.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2011.01.018</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Précigout, J. and Hirth, G.: B-type olivine fabric induced by grain
boundary sliding, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 395, 231–240,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.03.052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.03.052</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Raleigh, C. B.: Mechanisms of plastic deformation of olivine, J. Geophys.
Res., 73, 5391–5406,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB073i016p05391" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB073i016p05391</a>,
1968.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Rauch, E. F. and Dupuy, L.: Rapid spot diffraction patterns identification
through template matching, Arch. Metall. Mater., 50, 87–99, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Rauch, E. F. and Véron, M.: Automated crystal orientation and phase
mapping in TEM, Mater. Charact., 98, 1–9,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2014.08.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2014.08.010</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Ree, J. H.: Grain boundary sliding and development of grain boundary opening
in experimentally deformed octachloropropane, J. Struct. Geol., 16,
403–418,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(94)90044-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(94)90044-2</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Ribe, N. and Yu, Y.: A theory for plastic deformation and textural
evolution of olivine polycrystals, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 8325–8335,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/90JB02721" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/90JB02721</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Rollett, A., Humphreys, F. J., Rohrer, G. S., and Hatherly, M.:
Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena, 2nd Edn., Elsevier,
Oxford, UK, 658 pp., ISBN 9780080441641, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Satsukawa, T. and Michibayashi, K.: Flow in the uppermost mantle during
back-arc spreading revealed by Ichinomegata peridotite xenoliths, NE Japan,
Lithos, 189, 89–104,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2013.10.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2013.10.035</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, G. I.: Plastic strain in metals, J. l. Met., 62, 307–324, 1938.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Thieme, M., Demouchy, S., Mainprice, D., Barou, F., and Cordier, P.: Stress
evolution and associated microstructure during transient creep of olivine at
1000–1200&thinsp;°C, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 278, 34–46,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2018.03.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2018.03.002</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Tielke, J. A., Zimmerman, M. E., and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Hydrolytic weakening in
olivine single crystals, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 3465–3479,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014004</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Wallis, D., Hansen, L. N., Ben Britton, T., and Wilkinson, A. J.:
Geometrically necessary dislocation densities in olivine obtained using
high-angular resolution electron backscatter diffraction, Ultramicroscopy,
168, 34–45,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.06.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.06.002</a>,
2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Warren, J. M. and Hirth, G.: Grain size sensitive deformation mechanisms in
naturally deformed peridotites, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 248, 438–450,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.06.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.06.006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Wheeler, J., Mariani, E., Piazolo, S., Prior, D. J., Trimby, P., and Drury, M. R.:
The weighted Burgers vector: a new quantity for constraining
dislocation densities and types using electron backscatter diffraction on 2D
sections through crystalline materials, J. Microscopy, 233, 482–494,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03136.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03136.x</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Wright, S. I., Nowell, M. M., and Field, D. P.: A review of strain analysis
using electron backscatter diffraction, Microsc. Microanal., 17, 316–329,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927611000055" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927611000055</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Zimmerman, M. E. and Kohlstedt, D. L.: Rheological properties of partially
molten lherzolite, J. Petrol., 45, 275–298,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egg089" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egg089</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
